US Presidential Election in 2020

US Presidential Election in 2020

Summary

The 2020 United States presidential election was the 59th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. The Democratic ticket of former vice president Joe Biden and the junior U.S. senator from California Kamala Harris defeated the incumbent Republican president, Donald Trump, and vice president, Mike Pence. The election took place against the backdrop of the global COVID-19 pandemic and related recession. The election saw the highest voter turnout by percentage since 1900, with each of the two main tickets receiving more than 74 million votes, surpassing Barack Obama’s record of 69.5 million votes from 2008. Biden received more than 81 million votes, the most votes ever cast for a candidate in a U.S. presidential election.

Source: Wikipedia

OnAir Post: US Presidential Election in 2020

News

Joe Biden expressed confidence to supporters as President Trump falsely claimed victory. In the Senate races, Democrats faced an uphill battle to claim a majority.

President Trump won a series of key battlegrounds early on Wednesday morning, including Florida, Ohio and Iowa, as Joseph R. Biden Jr. expressed confidence he would ultimately prevail across key Northern states and Arizona as the presidential contest turned into a state-by-state slog that could drag deeper into the week.

“We believe we are on track to win this election,” Mr. Biden said in a brief speech after 12:30 a.m. Eastern, saying he was “optimistic” about the outcome once all the votes were counted.

US election polls tracker: who is leading in swing states, Trump or Biden?
Ashley Kirk, Pablo Gutiérrez, Frank Hulley-Jones and Juweek AdolpheOctober 28, 2020

Joe Biden is leading ​Donald Trump in the national polls for the presidential election.

But that doesn’t guarantee ​the Democratic candidate victory. Hillary Clinton also had a clear lead over Trump in the polls for almost the entire 2016 campaign. She ended up losing in the electoral college.

​Because the presidential ​voting system assigns each state a number of electoral college votes, which​ go to the state’s victor regardless of the​ margin of victory (with the exception of Nebraska and Maine), a handful of swing states will ​probably decide the election and be targeted heavily by campaigners.

Twitter and Facebook’s handling of the New York Post piece has pushed long-simmering MAGA complaints to the top of Republicans’ talking points.

MAGA world is uniting with mainstream conservatives to whip up a frenzy over social-media bias in the final weeks of the election, convinced that the handling of a New York Post story about Hunter Biden has presented a validating example of years-old MAGA complaints.

Twitter and Facebook’s attempts to limit sharing of the Post story, citing policies meant to throttle the distribution of hacked materials and fact-challenged articles, is being used as proof positive in MAGA world that social media firms have a liberal agenda, and are using whatever means necessary to censor conservatives and protect liberals. And Republicans across the ideological spectrum are agreeing.

The incident has fueled Republican plans to vote on subpoenas that would force testimony from the CEOs of both Twitter and Facebook on the issue. That hearing would come on top of another one already planned for next Wednesday, when Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg will face a grilling over liability protections the tech industry enjoys for content posted on their platforms. Other Republican lawmakers, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, have signaled shifts in how they wanted to regulate social-media platforms. And at the White House, chief of staff Mark Meadows has threatened to sue the two companies over the issue.

 

Why Trump Is Losing White Suburban Women
Meredith Conroy et al.October 20, 2020

Over the past few months, President Trump has framed the 2020 election as a defense of suburbia. In a Wall Street Journal column in August, he and Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson promised to protect the suburbs from being transformed into “dysfunctional cities.” And in a tweet several days later, Trump warned that suburban women should be wary of Democrats, as they would allow crime to drift into suburban communities. More recently, the president has grown less subtle, imploring suburban women at his rally in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, last week to like him. “[C]an I ask you to do me a favor, suburban women? Will you please like me? Please. Please. I saved your damn neighborhood, OK?”

The suburbs, in Trump’s telling, are under siege — and a Joe Biden presidency would transform them beyond recognition. But it might be that Trump doesn’t actually recognize what suburbia looks like today.

Establishing what constitutes a “suburb” is hard; there is no single definition, and what’s more, in the past 40 years, the suburbs have become much more diverse. This is bad news for Trump, as his vision of suburbia seems largely stuck in the 1950s — a manicured lawn, a husband heading into the city to work at a white-collar job, and a “housewife” tending to the children and preparing dinner. Only this version of suburbia doesn’t really exist anymore.

Bloomberg knocks Trump back on his heels in Florida
Politico, Marc Caputo et al.October 20, 2020

The former New York City mayor’s spending is forcing the president to dig deep in the key swing state and enabling the Biden campaign to spend ad dollars elsewhere.

Billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s $100 million investment in Florida to defeat Donald Trump is recasting the presidential contest in the president’s must-win state, forcing his campaign to spend big to shore up his position and freeing up Democratic cash to expand the electoral map elsewhere.

Bloomberg’s massive advertising and ground-game spending, which began roughly a month ago, has thrown Trump into a defensive crouch across the arc of Sunbelt states. As a result, the president‘s campaign has scaled back its TV ad buys in crucial Northern swing states like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan — a vacuum being filled by a constellation of outside political groups backing Joe Biden.

“It’s forced the Trump campaign to retrench in Florida. You can see it in the spending habits, in television and digital. They’re investing more at the expense of places they need to win,” said Steve Schale, who leads the pro-Biden Unite the Country super PAC.

More than $1 billion has now been spent on TV ads for the 2020 presidential election in just 13 states, an NPR analysis of the latest ad spending data from the tracking firm Advertising Analytics finds.

Most of that money has been spent by Democrat Joe Biden’s campaign and groups supporting him. Biden and allies have spent more than $600 million, while President Trump’s campaign and groups supporting him have spent a little over $400 million.

The money is concentrated in just six states. Almost $9 out of every $10 spent on TV in the presidential race — $882 million — is being invested in Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, North Carolina, Wisconsin and Arizona.

Biden tops 270 in POLITICO’s Election Forecast
Politico, Steven ShepardOctober 12, 2020

To win reelection, Trump would now have to sweep five toss-up states, plus a “lean Democratic” state like Wisconsin or Pennsylvania.

Joe Biden has reached 270 electoral votes for the first time since POLITICO’s Election Forecast debuted late last year.

In addition to a double-digit national lead, Biden has built a stable advantage in the three Great Lakes States that put Donald Trump over the top in 2016: Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Our latest presidential-race ratings now have Biden favored in enough states — including Wisconsin, which we’ve moved from “toss-up” to “lean Democratic”— to clinch the presidency.

Anti-Trump, but not fully for Biden: Will Gen Z vote?
Politico, Rishika DugyalaOctober 11, 2020

The youngest citizens are eager to make a difference, driven by strong anti-Trump sentiment and the tumultuous year. But they’re not as sold on a Biden-led Democratic Party and the electoral process.

|

How Joe Biden is actually a good politician
CNN, Harry EntenOctober 10, 2020

Democrats spent the primary season trying to find the perfect candidate to take on President Donald Trump. In the minds of some, they ended up “settling” on former Vice President Joe Biden.

While Democrats may have “settled”, it seems that Biden has ended up being a good candidate for the moment. He’s stayed out of Trump’s way and in doing so has built a large lead with under a month to go before the election.

Biden is ahead of Trump pretty much everywhere that matters. He’s up nationally. Biden’s up in Pennsylvania. He’s up in Florida. Biden’s up in Wisconsin. You get the point.

In a vice presidential debate so civil and calm that an insect briefly took center stage, what moments actually mattered? 17 experts weigh in.

What really mattered in a debate when the lines in the campaign are already so firmly drawn? Politico Magazine reached out to a group of political operatives and observers and asked them what stood out. As they watched, they saw Harris as a well-briefed prosecutor who “came for Mike Pence and didn’t miss,” but who also wasn’t willing to answer a direct question on the controversial idea of packing the Supreme Court. In Pence, some saw his constant interruptions of both Harris and the moderator as an “obnoxious” performance that would hurt him with suburban women—but others saw him land effective shots on behalf of the administration’s more successful economic messages, the “steady but biting hand that Republicans were eager to see.”

The biggest surprise, perhaps, was the black fly that very visibly perched on Pence’s head for a stretch of the debate, providing a distraction from the grimmer reality overshadowing the evening. As the plexiglas shields reminded viewers, this whole campaign is unfolding in an anything-but-normal pandemic moment. Here’s what our experts saw:

 

Where Trump and Biden stand on 9 major policy issues
CNN, Mackenzie Happe and Kate Sullivan,September 29, 2020

President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden have taken very different positions on a range of policy issues. Hear from Trump and Biden in their own words how they would tackle the problems facing the United States.

Biden’s plan to address the pandemic includes offering free testing to all Americans. It calls for hiring 100,000 people for national contact-tracing, as well as increasing drive-thru testing sites. He is also urging Trump to use the Defense Production Act to ramp up production of protective equipment for health care workers, testing supplies and other items. Biden’s plan includes steps designed to help businesses and schools reopen, including financial support for retaining and rehiring workers, building a best-practices clearinghouse for schools and guaranteeing paid leave for anyone with coronavirus or who is caring for someone with the virus. The former vice president also said he would call Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, shortly after being declared the winner of the general election to ask him to remain a member of the White House coronavirus task force. Biden has said he would mandate that everyone wear a mask in public.

Five takeaways from NYT Trump taxes bombshell
The Hill, Sylvia LaneSeptember 28, 2020

The New York Times on Sunday published a groundbreaking look into President Trump’s finances based on more than a decade of tax documents closely guarded by the president.

The bombshell report shed new light onto how Trump reportedly used his business empire to wipe out much of his own income tax liabilities, but at potentially high financial and legal risk.

Here are five key takeaways from the report on Trump’s taxes.

  • Trump paid almost nothing in personal income taxes for nearly two decades
  • Business losses protected his personal gains
  • Financial record at odds with Trump’s boasts and disclosures
  • A ton of debt — and due soon
  • Trump could face serious legal consequences
How Biden continues to eat into Trump’s base
CNN, Harry EntenSeptember 26, 2020

President Donald Trump heads into the debate trailing former Vice President Joe Biden. Trump is the first incumbent to be losing in the polls at this point since George H.W. Bush in 1992.

Trump’s obvious goal for the debate is to try and win back some of the White voters without a college degree that he’s clearly lost since 2016. In doing so, he might be able to stop Biden’s easiest paths to taking back the White House for the Democrats.
Take a look at the live interview national polls taken since the conventions that meet CNN standards for reporting. We’re talking about nine polls in total from eight pollsters, so it’s a large sample.

Trump won’t commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses 

President Donald Trump’s stunning refusal to commit to a peaceful transition of power was mostly dismissed by Republicans on Capitol Hill, with many downplaying the remarks as merely rhetoric and others deflecting questions about a comment that Democrats fear could threaten a fundamental principle of American democracy.

“The President says crazy stuff. We’ve always had a peaceful transition of power. It’s not going to change,” said Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska, who has been an occasional critic of the President.

From 30,000 feet, the presidential race looks much as it did when we first launched our presidential election forecast in August. Joe Biden has about a 3 in 4 chance of winning compared to President Trump’s roughly 1 in 4 shot, according to FiveThirtyEight’s forecast. Biden’s chances did dip down to a 2 in 3 shot after the Republican National Convention on Aug. 31, but overall, his chances of winning have hung out in the low- to mid-70 percent range. By contrast, Trump’s chances have mostly bounced around in the mid- to high-20s.

But underneath the topline numbers, there has still been some fairly big movement in a handful of key battleground states, and the news has been mostly good for Biden. If we look at how much Biden’s odds have changed in states where both he and Trump have at least a 1 in 10 shot of winning since we launched the forecast on Aug. 12, Biden has improved his chances in 17 of 20 states. And in some cases, Biden’s improvement has been considerable — +15 percentage points in Minnesota, +12 points in Arizona and +10 points in Wisconsin, for instance. By comparison, Trump’s odds have really only improved in Florida, although he hasn’t lost much ground in states such as Georgia and Ohio, which may signal that Biden’s electoral gains will not be that expansive. (Trump still leads in Texas, for instance, despite Biden’s improvement there.)

Can you see through Trump’s invented reality?
Zachary B. WolfSeptember 17, 2020

Here’s a pop quiz on reality
I’m going to list a series of quotes — two or three on several subjects — and I’d like you to try to determine who said each one.

Hint: Each subject has a comment uttered within the past week by a top government official appointed by President Donald Trump.
They’re listed alongside something Trump said during a town hall broadcast by ABC News on Tuesday night. The event was notable since it’s a very rare foray for the President outside of his Fox News-insulated zone.

And the things he said to disaffected former supporters and people with pre-existing conditions, were difficult to square with reality. CNN’s Daniel Dale did a full fact check and called the President’s comments a “fire hose of lying.”

Unmasking Trump’s real governing philosophy
Joe Lockhart (opinion)September 16, 2020

The clash between Trump and Joe Biden is between two distinct philosophies and values that have been duking it out in America for more than 240 years.

In this corner, individualism. This is the ideology that values personal freedom and autonomy, the right to pursue one’s own goals and desires and values the rights of the individual above those of the state or other social groups.

No one embodies that philosophy more than Trump. He is a walking, breathing example of I’m OK, and everyone else can just fend for themselves. We hear it every day from Trump. Americans have the right to make up their own minds on what they do, how they live and what risks they will take with their own bodies. One irony here is that philosophy does not extend to reproductive rights. But I digress.

The Gray Wall
JIM NEWELLSeptember 16, 2020

Old people elected Trump. Will they make him a one-term president?

In 2016, older voters were one of Trump’s best demographics. According to exit polls, while Hillary Clinton won voters 45 and under by 14 percentage points, Trump won voters 45 and older—the larger age cohort—by 8 points. A separate Pew Research Center study of the electorate found that voters 65 and older were Trump’s strongest overall age demographic last time around. He won them by 9 points.

But while the country has spent four years bracing itself for a replay of November 2016, with eyes fixed on the same Pennsylvania-to-Wisconsin battlegrounds as before, the age-demographic landscape of the presidential contest has been quietly and dramatically rearranged. Although polling in recent months has shown Trump maintaining his advantage among the 50-to-64-year-old cohort, support among those over 65 has moved sharply toward Biden. In a national survey from Monmouth University released on Aug. 11, for example, which gave Biden a 10-point lead overall, Biden was leading registered voters over 65 by 17 points. That would represent a shift of 26 points among the oldest measured demographic from 2016. A Quinnipiac national poll from mid-July, meanwhile, showed Biden’s lead among the 65-plus at 14 points.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gp2lW1nU2c

Trump drops out. Biden gets sick. Pence is fired. What if 2020 gets really crazy?
Politico, John Harris & Daniel LippmanJuly 8, 2020

The most norm-shattering leader in American history is bound to produce some surprises, especially with his reelection in peril.

Multiple interviews in recent days with influential people in Washington’s political class, including strategists and government veterans in both major parties and figures who have served at high levels in the Trump White House, found most people expecting some sort of dramatic shift of plot in this election year.

Three factors, in the calculations of these insiders, increase the likelihood of an event that in a conventional era would be highly unlikely:

•President Donald Trump’s psychology, predisposed to dramatic and unorthodox actions, as he contemplates public polling and news coverage that increasingly describe him as an underdog for reelection.

•The age of Trump and presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden, 74 and 77, respectively, during a coronavirus pandemic that has disproportionately affected elderly people.

•The general tumult in which the 2020 election is taking place, because of the pandemic and the vast decline in the domestic and world economies as a result of related shutdowns.

President Trump could be in trouble. A lot could still change between now and November, but historically, the strength of the economy is correlated with the electoral strength of the incumbent president, and right now, the economy doesn’t look especially good.

Between mid-March and the end of May, more than 38 million Americans applied for unemployment insurance. And even though the job market has shown some signs of improvement, many Americans are still out of work, and in June more of the people who lost their jobs were laid off permanently. And if the economic recovery progresses slowly — or halts and starts backsliding — it’s likely to drag down Trump’s reelection chances. At the very least, the downturn takes away what had been perhaps his strongest re-election argument.

Even in more normal election years, many voters still worry about the economy. The American National Election Studies, which has tracked public opinion since 1948, has for many years now asked voters what they think is the most important problem facing the country. And in the last three presidential election cycles, Americans have named the economy as their top concern, making it the most frequently cited issue. In 2008 (the last time we had a presidential election amid an economic crisis), 42 percent of Americans said the economy was the most important political problem. Since then, the share citing the economy as their top issue has dropped — it was 32 percent in 2012 and just 11 percent in 2016.

So far in 2020, polls show that anywhere from 1 in 5 to 1 in 3 voters rate the economy as their top concern. But let’s return to 2020 in a moment. So what do we know about these voters?

Leaders like Trump fail if they cannot speak the truth and earn trust
The Conversation, Kenneth P. RuscioJuly 8, 2020

During a recent Senate committee hearing on the COVID-19 crisis, Dr. Anthony Fauci told lawmakers he was concerned about “a lack of trust of authority, a lack of trust in government.”

He had reason to be worried. The Pew Center reported that July 7 only 17% of people in the U.S. have confidence in government to do the right thing. Never in the history of their surveys, which began in 1958, has that confidence been so low.

Why is trust so low and why does that matter, especially during a crisis – and especially during this crisis?

No playbook

The dilemma of leadership in modern democracy has long been the focus of my scholarship and teaching. I have asked what qualities and virtues leaders need to preside over a government of, by and for the people. If it’s a challenging topic, it is also one never lacking for material. The current era points especially to the importance of trust for effective and legitimate leadership in democracies.

The story begins with a basic principle of democracy: Leaders cannot do whatever they please.

The drafters of the United States Constitution assumed that anyone with power would always have the opportunity – and often the temptation – to abuse it. To protect society from unruly rulers, they set up an obstacle course of elaborate procedures, checks and balances, separated powers and a stringent rule of law that applied to everyone, even those who wrote the laws.

In this system, inefficiency and complexity became virtues. Deliberation trumped dispatch.

It isn’t easy for leaders to act, and it is not supposed to be.

That’s a problem during a crisis. Emergencies require swift, decisive steps, sometimes improvised and often pushing the boundaries of formal authority.

[Get the best of The Conversation, every weekend. Sign up for our weekly newsletter.]

There’s no playbook, and those hurdles designed to prevent leaders from doing bad things may now prevent them from doing necessary things.

Even John Locke, the 17th-century British philosopher so influential in the American approach to accountability and limited government, understood that stuff happens. And when it does, the machinery of government may prove too slow and cumbersome.

With regret but cold realism, Locke conceded that when severe threats appear, “There is a latitude left to the executive power, to do many things of choice which the laws do not prescribe.”

Discretion granted, trust needed

German leader Angela Merkel’s cool, measured and rational approach inspires confidence. John MacDougall/AFP via Getty Images

That’s precisely when trust becomes critical.

The discretion granted to democratic leaders in times of crisis – the room they have to maneuver – depends entirely on how much the people trust them. And that depends on their competency, honesty and commitment to the public interest.

One of Dwight Eisenhower’s biographers explains that discipline was central to his leadership style. Eisenhower leaned heavily on experts and had the patience and persistence to navigate the complex machinery of government. Sometimes that made him appear cautious, but few questioned his competence.

Today German Chancellor Angela Merkel embodies the same set of skills, a cool, measured and rational approach that inspires confidence. High among her leadership qualities is a projection of competence, no doubt enhanced by Germany’s success responding to the pandemic.

The Financial Times political columnist Gideon Rachman wonders if the pandemic will ultimately be a setback for populist leaders such as Boris Johnson in Great Britain, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil and Donald Trump in the United States. They seem thrilled by the theater of politics but bored by the details of governing. As their countries suffer some of the worst effects of the pandemic, Rachman believes citizens will rediscover the value of sheer competence.

Honesty and the public interest

Telling the truth also earns trust.

But honesty is more than just conveying basic facts. It is the capacity to explain the crisis, the sacrifice required and the path to a solution.

During his ‘fireside chats,’ President Franklin Roosevelt’s calm, clear and accessible explanations about the challenges of the Depression were instrumental in reassuring the nation. MPI/Getty images

Roosevelt during the DepressionChurchill during World War IIKennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis and Bush in the aftermath of 9/11 (at least the immediate aftermath) were granted considerable discretion because they accurately described and credibly interpreted the challenge facing the people.

In the current crisis, medical professionals have told the inconvenient truths about the pandemic. Political leaders at the national level have offered false hopes and misleading information. That is why trust in medical professionals in the United States far exceeds trust in elected officials.

Finally, trust is given when leaders act in the public interest, not their own self-interest.

Perhaps the most damning indictment in John Bolton’s book about his time in the Trump administration was this assessment of the president: “I am hard-pressed to identify a significant Trump decision during my tenure that wasn’t driven by reelection calculations.”

One 2016 Trump voter explained his recent change of heart even more bluntly: “It was like this dude is just in it for himself. I thought he was supposed to be for the people.”

If that perception becomes widespread, it will deplete whatever stock of trust citizens have left for the president. Those Pew measures of trust are fundamental expressions of whether citizens believe leaders will forsake their own immediate interests to serve a public interest.

Dr. Fauci is right. A solution to the pandemic requires testing, contact tracing, masks, social distancing and ultimately a vaccine. It also requires leaders who are competent, honest and committed to the public interest – leaders who are trustworthy.

The absence of trust jeopardizes an effective response to a health crisis. But it also creates a political crisis, a loss of faith in democracy as a way to govern ourselves. Public health in the U.S. is at stake. So is the health of democracy.

Don’t expect Biden’s VP pick to make or break the 2020 election
The Conversation, Christopher DevineJuly 2, 2020

On rare occasions, voters can be swayed by running mates who are much more – or less – popular than their party’s main candidate. For instance, John Kerry’s vice presidential candidate in 2004, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, was relatively popular with voters early in the campaign. And, as our research shows, Edwards’ popularity made voters more likely to vote for Kerry, at least in the short term.

Some political analysts believe a vice presidential selection could draw key voters from that person’s own demographic group or their home state. We found that rarely happens, either.

[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter.]

However, we found that voters view vice presidential choices as new information about the main candidate – and that information can shift voters’ views and change votes. The candidate’s choice gives voters insight into who the candidate really is, what he or she stands for and how the person might operate once in office.

Take the 2008 presidential election, for example, when Democrat Barack Obama ran against Republican John McCain with Joe Biden and Sarah Palin as their respective vice presidential nominees.

In our book, we demonstrate that voters who doubted Palin’s qualifications also were more likely to doubt McCain’s judgment and think he was too old to be president. As a result, they were less likely to vote for McCain.

John McCain, right, picked Sarah Palin, second from left, as his running mate in 2008. Rachael Dickson/Wikimedia CommonsCC BY

Conversely, our analysis also showed that voters who believed Biden was well qualified for office were more likely to approve of Obama’s judgment – and less likely to think he was too young to be president. As a result, they were more likely to vote for Obama.

In 2020, Joe Biden is already well known as an experienced former vice president, so it’s unlikely his running mate will outshine him on her own. But with this choice, Biden has a valuable opportunity to define himself as a candidate – and a potential president – in his own right.

What does he really stand for? What are his political priorities? And does he have the good judgment to be president?

Biden’s selection will help voters to answer these questions – and to decide whether he deserves their support in November.

Donald Trump

Current Position: President of the United States
Affiliation: Republican
Candidate: 2020 President

President Trump is working hard to implement his ‘America First’ platform, continuing his promise to the American people to lower taxes, repeal and replace Obamacare, end stifling regulations, protect our borders, keep jobs in our country, take care of our veterans, strengthen our military and law enforcement, and renegotiate bad trade deals, creating a government of, by and for the people.

He is making America First, again, restoring our nation’s faith, ushering in a bright, new future now and for generations to come.

For more information, see Donald Trump’s post.

Joe Biden

Current Position: Other
Affiliation: Democrat
Candidate: 2020 President
Former Position(s): Vice President from 2008 – 2016; US Senator from 1973 – 2009

America is an idea.

An idea that goes back to our founding principle that all men are created equal. It’s an idea that’s stronger than any army, bigger than any ocean, more powerful than any dictator. It gives hope to the most desperate people on Earth. It instills in every single person in this country the belief that no matter where they start in life, there’s nothing they can’t achieve if they work at it.

We’re in a battle for the soul of America. It’s time to remember who we are. We’re Americans: tough, resilient, but always full of hope. It’s time to treat each other with dignity. Build a middle class that works for everybody. Fight back against the incredible abuses of power we’re seeing. It’s time to dig deep and remember that our best days still lie ahead.

It’s time for respected leadership on the world stage—and dignified leadership at home. It’s time for equal opportunity, equal rights, and equal justice. It’s time for an economy that rewards those who actually do the work. It’s time for a president who will stand up for all of us.

For more information, see Donald Trump’s post.

Issues

Governance

Donald Trump 

Government Accountability

President Trump has tightened rules for federal employees both past and present to ensure his administration works for the American people.

The president signed an executive order that placed a five-year ban on lobbying and a lifetime ban on lobbying for foreign countries for federal employees.

President Trump called for a comprehensive plan to reorganize the executive branch.
President Trump began a comprehensive overhaul of digitally-delivered government services.
President Trump called for a “full audit of the Pentagon.” The Department of Defense (DOD) responded to the president’s call to action and began its full financial statement audit.

To ensure the Government serves the needs of all Americans, President Trump has established a comprehensive plan to reorganize the executive branch and his administration has begun to implement this plan.

Joe Biden 

BIDEN PLAN TO GUARANTEE GOVERNMENT WORKS FOR THE PEOPLE

“We the people.” Those words changed everything. Power rested in the people, not the government. Freedom to think, to speak, to act, to criticize your government, all protected. We became the model for the world. […] Our Constitution doesn’t begin with the phrase, “We the Democrats” or “We the Republicans.” And it certainly doesn’t begin with the phrase, “We the Donors.”

– Joe Biden, 2020 presidential campaign kickoff, May 18, 2019

Donald Trump has presided over the most corrupt administration in modern history. Trump has abused the presidency to enrich himself – spending countless tax dollars at his own properties. Members of his administration have failed to divest themselves from conflicts of interest as promised. Trump has weaponized the Executive Branch against its core mission, including using the U.S. Justice Department to protect the president and his interests, over the American people and the rule of law. And, Trump has welcomed wealthy special interests – including the National Rifle Association – into the Oval Office and to the highest levels of his administration to develop and guide policy.

The charge facing the president who follows Donald Trump is as big as it is essential: restoring faith in American government. The next president must demonstrate with their actions – not empty words – that public servants serve all Americans, not themselves or narrow special interests. Public office is not the prize for winning an election, but an imperative to improve the lives of people across the country – no matter their gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, zip code, or income. The President of the United States has a core responsibility to earn and keep the trust of the American people.

We must elect leaders with integrity, for whom the public interest is paramount. But that’s not enough. We also must strengthen our laws to ensure that no future president can ever again use the office for personal gain. The federal government’s power must be used to better the country, and not in service of narrow, private interests.

Biden is offering an ambitious proposal to ensure that our government works for the people. Specifically, President Biden will:

THE BIDEN PLAN FOR BANKRUPTCY REFORM

Biden is adopting Senator Warren’s comprehensive proposal, Fixing Our Bankruptcy System to Give People a Second ChanceIn 2005, Biden worked hard to add progressive reforms to a bankruptcy bill that was going to be passed with or without him. Today, he agrees firmly with Senator Warren that we need to fundamentally reshape our bankruptcy system.

As described by Senator Warren in her plan, this plan will:

  • Make it easier for people being crushed by debt to obtain relief through bankruptcy.
  • Expand people’s rights to take care of themselves and their children while they are in the bankruptcy process.
  • End the absurd rules that make it nearly impossible to discharge student loan debt in bankruptcy.
  • Let more people protect their homes and cars in bankruptcy so they can start from a firm foundation when they start to pick up the pieces and rebuild their financial lives.
  • Help address shameful racial and gender disparities that plague our bankruptcy system.
  • Close loopholes that allow the wealthy and corporate creditors to abuse the bankruptcy system at the expense of everyone else.

THE BIDEN PLAN FOR STRENGTHENING AMERICA’S COMMITMENT TO JUSTICE

Equality, equity, justice – these ideas form the American creed. We have never lived up to it and we haven’t always gotten it right, but we’ve never stopped trying. This is especially true when it comes to our criminal justice system.

Today, too many people are incarcerated in the United States – and too many of them are black and brown. To build safe and healthy communities, we need to rethink who we’re sending to jail, how we treat those in jail, and how we help them get the health care, education, jobs, and housing they need to successfully rejoin society after they serve their time. As president, Joe Biden will strengthen America’s commitment to justice and reform our criminal justice system. 

See post for more info.

 

Economy

Donald Trump 

Economy And Jobs

Under President Trump’s leadership, Congress passed historic tax cuts and relief for hard-working Americans. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act:

Is the first major tax reform signed in 30 years.
Provided tax relief for 82% of middle-class families.
Doubled the Child Tax Credit proving an additional $1,000 per child in tax relief for working parents.
Nearly doubled the standard deduction, a change that simplified the tax filing process for millions of Americans.
Cut taxes for small business by 20%, providing $415 billion in tax relief for small business owners.
Alleviated the tax burden on over 500 companies. who used those savings to fund bonuses, wage increases for 4.8 million workers.
Spurred new investments into the American economy, after it was passed businesses invested $482 billion into new American projects.
Repealed Obamacare’s burdensome individual mandate.
Made U.S. companies competitive on the world stage, lowering the corporate tax rate from one of the highest in the industrialized world (35%) to 21%.

Joe Biden 

BIDEN PLAN FOR STRENGTHENING WORKER ORGANIZING, COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, AND UNIONS

Strong unions built the great American middle class. Everything that defines what it means to live a good life and know you can take care of your family – the 40 hour work week, paid leave, health care protections, a voice in your workplace – is because of workers who organized unions and fought for worker protections. Because of organizing and collective bargaining, there used to be a basic bargain between workers and their employers in this country that when you work hard, you share in the prosperity your work created.

Today, however, there’s a war on organizing, collective bargaining, unions, and workers. It’s been raging for decades, and it’s getting worse with Donald Trump in the White House. Republican governors and state legislatures across the country have advanced anti-worker legislation to undercut the labor movement and collective bargaining. States have decimated the rights of public sector workers who, unlike private sector workers, do not have federal protections ensuring their freedom to organize and collectively bargain. In the private sector, corporations are using profits to buy back their own shares and increase CEOs’ compensation instead of investing in their workers and creating more good-quality jobs. The results have been predictable: rising income inequality, stagnant real wages, the loss of pensions, exploitation of workers, and a weakening of workers’ voices in our society.

Biden is proposing a plan to grow a stronger, more inclusive middle class – the backbone of the American economy – by strengthening public and private sector unions and helping all workers bargain successfully for what they deserve.

As president, Biden will:

Check the abuse of corporate power over labor and hold corporate executives personally accountable for violations of labor laws;
Encourage and incentivize unionization and collective bargaining; and
Ensure that workers are treated with dignity and receive the pay, benefits, and workplace protections they deserve.
This plan is a critical addition to Biden’s proposals to ensure all workers have access to quality, affordable health care; to guarantee all workers are able to send their children to quality public schools and have access to universal pre-kindergarten; to provide education and training beyond high school, including federally Registered Apprenticeships; to support a clean energy revolution that creates millions of unionized middle-class jobs; and to meet our commitment to invest first in American workers and ensure that labor is at the table to negotiate every trade deal. In the months ahead, Biden will continue to outline in further detail his related proposals, including on issues related to pensions, starting with passing the Butch Lewis Act; infrastructure investments and project labor agreements; and workplace equality.

CHECK THE ABUSE OF CORPORATE POWER OVER LABOR

President Trump and Republican leadership think this country was built by CEOs and hedge fund managers, but they’re wrong. Joe Biden knows that our country was built by hard-working Americans. While we could survive without Wall Street and investment banks, our entire economy would collapse without electricians to keep our lights on, auto workers on the line building our cars, drivers who deliver all things we need for our daily lives to our markets, firefighters, ambulance drivers, service workers, educators, and millions more.

Yet employers steal about $15 billion a year from working people just by paying workers less than the minimum wage. On top of that, workers experience huge losses in salary caused by other forms of wage theft, like employers not paying overtime, forcing off-the-clock work, and misclassifying workers. At the same time, these companies are raking in billions of dollars in profits and paying CEOs tens and hundreds of millions of dollars.

In addition, employers repeatedly interfere with workers’ efforts to organize and collectively bargain. In nearly all union campaigns, corporations run a campaign against the union. Three in four employers hire anti-union consultants, spending approximately $1 billion each year on these efforts. Corporations fire pro-union workers in one of every three union campaigns and about half of corporations threaten to retaliate against workers during union campaigns. Even workers who successfully are able to form a union are later impeded by corporations who bargain in bad faith. About half of newly organized groups of workers do not have a contract a year later and one in three remain without a contract two years after a successful union election.

Biden will ensure employers respect workers’ rights. Specifically, he will:

See post for more info.

 

Education

Donald Trump 

Education

President Trump’s proposed budgets have made school choice a priority.

The President’s FY2018 Budget Request included $1 billion in funding to Furthering Options of Children to Unlock Success Grants for public school choice and $250 million to promote private school choice through the Education Innovation and Research Program.
In his FY2019 budget President Trump proposed a $5 billion federal tax credit on donations that fund scholarships to private and vocational schools, apprenticeships programs and other educational opportunities.
The Trump Administration successfully implemented the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) to empower states with the flexibility they need to educate their students.

35 states and the District of Columbia have had their ESSA plans approved and the Department of Education is reviewing the plans for the remaining states.
The Department of Education is urging states to embrace the opportunity provided by ESSA to end top-down mandates from Washington, D.C.
The Trump Administration implemented the year-round distribution of Pell grants, instead of limiting these grants to the spring and fall semesters.

Low-income students will now have access to these funds over summer and winter breaks, so they can earn their degrees faster with fewer loans.
The Trump Administration reformed the student loan servicing process to improve customer experience and lower costs.
The Trump Administration has reformed The Free Application for Federal Student Aid to make the program more accessible to students.
The Trump Administration brought in financial experts to modernize the way FSA offers and services student loans.
The Department of Education provided $359.8 million in federal assistance to 20 states and the U.S. Virgin Islands to assist with the cost of educating students displaced by Hurricane Harvey, Irma, Maria, or the 2017 California wildfires.

Joe Biden 

Biden Plan for K-12 Education

At a forum with teachers in Houston, Texas, Vice President Biden is outlining a plan that 1) provides educators the support and respect they need and deserve, and 2) invests in all children from birth, so that regardless of their zip code, parents’ income, race, or disability, they are prepared to succeed in tomorrow’s economy.

As president, Biden will:

Support our educators by giving them the pay and dignity they deserve.
Invest in resources for our schools so students grow into physically and emotionally healthy adults, and educators can focus on teaching.
Ensure that no child’s future is determined by their zip code, parents’ income, race, or disability.
Provide every middle and high school student a path to a successful career.
Start investing in our children at birth.
Providing Educators the Support and Respect They Need and Deserve
Educators deserve a partner in the White House. With President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden, they’ll get two. Dr. Biden has worked as an educator for more than 30 years. She and Joe understand that, for educators, their profession isn’t just what they do; it is who they are.

Educators – teachers, teachers’ aides, and everyone who supports our kids at school, from the bus drivers to the secretaries to the school nurses – answer a call to service. They help our children learn and grow into successful adults. For so many young people, knowing they have a teacher and school community believing in and fighting for them can make all the difference.

But while educating is rewarding, it is also challenging. Many educators across the country are experiencing stagnant wages, slashed benefits, growing class sizes, and fewer resources for their students. Too many teachers have to work second jobs to make ends meet for their families. And, far too often, teachers and school personnel have to take on additional responsibilities that go far beyond the classroom. Educators end up spending their own money on school supplies, mentoring and coaching new teachers, trying to fill in as social workers, and so much more. Teachers should be supported with resources and shouldn’t have to take on all of these responsibilities on their own.

Over the last year we have witnessed educators around the country – in states from West Virginia to Arizona to Kentucky – heroically organize walk-outs and other actions to stand up not just for their own wages and benefits, but also for the resources they need to serve their students. Educators shouldn’t have to fight so hard for resources and respect.

President Biden will support our educators by giving them the pay and dignity they deserve.

JOE BIDEN’S ROADMAP TO REOPENING SCHOOLS SAFELY

Educators, students, and families have done an incredible job in difficult circumstances during this pandemic. Everyone wants schools to fully reopen for in-person instruction. Creating the conditions to make it happen should be a top national priority. Joe Biden believes that the decision about when to reopen safely should be made by state, tribal, and local officials, based on science and in consultation with communities and tribal governments. It should be made with the safety of students and educators in mind. And, it should be made recognizing that if we do this wrong, we will put lives at risk and set our economy and our country back.

 

The challenge facing our schools is unprecedented. President Trump has made it much worse. We had a window to get this right. And, Trump blew it. His administration failed to heed the experts and take the steps required to reduce infections in our communities. As a result, cases have exploded. Now our window before the new school year is closing rapidly, and we are forced to grapple with reopening our schools in an environment of much greater risk to educators, students, and their families than there would have been if America had competent leadership.

 

Over a month ago, Biden identified key steps that Donald Trump needed to take to reopen our schools safely. Trump has taken none of them. In fact, he’s done the opposite. He has threatened to force schools to reopen for in-person instruction without the basic resources they need to keep students, educators, and communities safe. If Trump had actually done his job as President, the decisions facing our schools would look fundamentally different.

 

Joe Biden has a simple five-step roadmap to support local decision-making on reopening schools safely and to help students whose learning was interrupted:

See post for more info.

 

Environment

Donald Trump 

Energy And Environment

he Department of the Interior proposed its largest oil and gas lease of over 78 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico.

President Trump signed an Executive Order to expand offshore oil and gas drilling and open more leases to develop offshore drilling.
President Trump and his administration acted aggressively to increase exports of energy resources to the global market.

This allowed financing for coal and fossil energy projects.
The Department of Energy announced the approval of the Lake Charles Liquefied Natural Gas terminal.
American LNG export opportunities increased under the Trump administration.
President Trump has approved the infrastructure and provided the resources needed to unleash oil and gas production in the U.S.

The administration approved the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines, supporting an estimated total of 42,000 jobs and $2 billion in wages.
The administration announced the approval of the New Burgos Pipeline, a cross-border project that will export U.S. gasoline to Mexico.
The Trump administration reversed President Obama’s moratorium on new leases for oil and gas development on federal lands.
President Trump rescinded President Obama’s costly Clean Power Plan and instead has proposed the Affordable Clean Energy Rule.

According to NERA Economic Consulting, the CPP would have increased electricity rates by as much as 14 percent, costing American households up to $79 billion.
The Affordable Clean Energy Rule will reduce greenhouse gasses, empower states, promote energy independence, and facilitate economic growth and job creation
In addition to the Clean Power Plan, the Trump administration has rescinded many costly Obama-Era regulations.

The EPA has rescinded President Obama’s methane emissions rule that would cost American energy developers an estimated $530 million annually.
The EPA is reviewing a rule that if rescinded would relax costly fuel standards and save $340 billion in regulatory costs.
President Trump announced his intent to withdraw the U.S. from the unfair Paris Climate Agreement.
In May 2017, the Trump administration created a Superfund task force designed to streamline the Superfund cleanup program.

The Superfund task force has designated 10 sites for “immediate, intense action.”

Joe Biden 

The Biden Plan for Climate Change

TAKE ACTION: Do you agree that we need drastic action to address the climate emergency? Sign on here >>
From coastal towns to rural farms to urban centers, climate change poses an existential threat – not just to our environment, but to our health, our communities, our national security, and our economic well-being. It also damages our communities with storms that wreak havoc on our towns and cities and our homes and schools. It puts our national security at risk by leading to regional instability that will require U.S military-supported relief activities and could make areas more vulnerable to terrorist activities.

Vice President Biden knows there is no greater challenge facing our country and our world. Today, he is outlining a bold plan – a Clean Energy Revolution – to address this grave threat and lead the world in addressing the climate emergency.

Biden believes the Green New Deal is a crucial framework for meeting the climate challenges we face. It powerfully captures two basic truths, which are at the core of his plan: (1) the United States urgently needs to embrace greater ambition on an epic scale to meet the scope of this challenge, and (2) our environment and our economy are completely and totally connected.

If we can harness all of our energy and talents, and unmatchable American innovation, we can turn this threat into an opportunity to revitalize the U.S. energy sector and boost growth economy-wide. We can create new industries that reinvigorate our manufacturing and create high-quality, middle-class jobs in cities and towns across the United States. We can lead America to become the world’s clean energy superpower. We can export our clean-energy technology across the globe and create high-quality, middle-class jobs here at home.  Getting to a 100% clean energy economy is not only an obligation, it’s an opportunity. We should fully adopt a clean energy future, not just for all of us today, but for our children and grandchildren, so their tomorrow is healthier, safer, and more just.

As president, Biden will lead the world to address the climate emergency and lead through the power of example, by ensuring the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and net-zero emissions no later than 2050.

The Biden Plan will:

Ensure the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and reaches net-zero emissions no later than 2050. On day one, Biden will sign a series of new executive orders with unprecedented reach that go well beyond the Obama-Biden Administration platform and put us on the right track. And, he will demand that Congress enacts legislation in the first year of his presidency that: 1) establishes an enforcement mechanism that includes milestone targets no later than the end of his first term in 2025, 2) makes a historic investment in clean energy and climate research and innovation, 3) incentivizes the rapid deployment of clean energy innovations across the economy, especially in communities most impacted by climate change.

Build a stronger, more resilient nation. On day one, Biden will make smart infrastructure investments to rebuild the nation and to ensure that our buildings, water, transportation, and energy infrastructure can withstand the impacts of climate change.  Every dollar spent toward rebuilding our roads, bridges, buildings, the electric grid, and our water infrastructure will be used to prevent, reduce, and withstand a changing climate. As President, Biden will use the convening power of government to boost climate resilience efforts by developing regional climate resilience plans, in partnership with local universities and national labs, for local access to the most relevant science, data, information, tools, and training.

Rally the rest of the world to meet the threat of climate change. Climate change is a global challenge that requires decisive action from every country around the world. Joe Biden knows how to stand with America’s allies, stand up to adversaries, and level with any world leader about what must be done. He will not only recommit the United States to the Paris Agreement on climate change – he will go much further than that. He will lead an effort to get every major country to ramp up the ambition of their domestic climate targets. He will make sure those commitments are transparent and enforceable, and stop countries from cheating by using America’s economic leverage and power of example. He will fully integrate climate change into our foreign policy and national security strategies, as well as our approach to trade.

Stand up to the abuse of power by polluters who disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income communities. Vulnerable communities are disproportionately impacted by the climate emergency and pollution. The Biden Administration will take action against fossil fuel companies and other polluters who put profit over people and knowingly harm our environment and poison our communities’ air, land, and water, or conceal information regarding potential environmental and health risks. The Biden plan will ensure that communities across the country from Flint, Michigan to Harlan, Kentucky to the New Hampshire Seacoast have access to clean, safe drinking water. And he’ll make sure the development of solutions is an inclusive, community-driven process.

Fulfill our obligation to workers and communities who powered our industrial revolution and subsequent decades of economic growth. This is support they’ve earned for fueling our country’s industrial revolution and decades of economic growth. We’re not going to leave any workers or communities behind.

 

Health Care

Donald Trump 

Healthcare

President Trump has worked to improve access to affordable quality health care.

The Department of Agriculture provided more than $1 billion in FY2017 to be used to improve access to health care services for 2.5 million people in rural communities.
The Trump administration expanded access to Association Health Plans (AHPs) allowing small business to pool risk across states.
The Trump Administration allows for Short-Term Limited Duration plans to be extended up to 12 months.
As part of the landmark Tax Cuts and Jobs Act President Trump repealed the individual mandate, which forced people to buy expensive insurance and taxed those who couldn’t afford it.

The mandate disproportionately hurt the poor: 80% of those affected made less than $50,000.
President Trump signed a six-year extension of CHIP to fund healthcare for 9 million.
President Trump has mobilized his entire administration to address drug addiction and opioid abuse by declaring the opioid crisis a nationwide public health emergency.

President Trump created a bipartisan opioid commission that issued 56 recommendations to help defeat the opioid crisis.
In October 2017, President Trump directed The Department of Health and Human Services to declare the opioid crisis a public health emergency, allowing grant money to be used to combat abuse.
President Trump signed the International Narcotics Trafficking Emergency Response by Detecting Incoming Contraband with Technology  (INTERDICT Act) that would give customs agents $9 million for screening tools on the border.
In FY2017, HHS invested nearly $900 million in opioid-specific funding.
President Trump successfully pressured China to close dangerous loopholes that allowed Chines fentanyl manufacturers to legally ship the compound worldwide, much of which ended up in the U.S.
Under President Trump, The FDA has approved the largest number of generic drugs in history.

Generics increase competition in the marketplace and lower the cost of prescription drugs for all Americans.
In December 2018, year-end drug prices fell for the first time in nearly 50 years.

Joe Biden 

On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law, with Vice President Biden standing by his side, and made history. It was a victory 100 years in the making. It was the conclusion of a tough fight that required taking on Republicans, special interests, and the status quo to do what’s right. But the Obama-Biden Administration got it done.

Today, the Affordable Care Act is still a big deal. Because of Obamacare, over 100 million people no longer have to worry that an insurance company will deny coverage or charge higher premiums just because they have a pre-existing condition – whether cancer or diabetes or heart disease or a mental health challenge. Insurance companies can no longer set annual or lifetime limits on coverage. Roughly 20 million additional Americans obtained the peace of mind that comes with health insurance. Young people who are in transition from school to a job have the option to stay covered by their parents’ plan until age 26.

But, every day over the past nine years, the Affordable Care Act has been under relentless attack.

Immediately after its passage, Congressional Republicans began trying again and again to repeal it. Following the lead of President Trump, Republicans in Congress have only doubled down on this approach since January 2017. And, since repeal through Congress has not been working, President Trump has been unilaterally doing everything he can to sabotage the Affordable Care Act. Now, the Trump Administration is trying to get the entire law – including protections for people with pre-existing conditions – struck down in court.

As president, Biden will protect the Affordable Care Act from these continued attacks. He opposes every effort to get rid of this historic law – including efforts by Republicans, and efforts by Democrats. Instead of starting from scratch and getting rid of private insurance, he has a plan to build on the Affordable Care Act by giving Americans more choicereducing health care costs, and making our health care system less complex to navigate.

For Biden, this is personal. He believes that every American has a right to the peace of mind that comes with knowing they have access to affordable, quality health care. He knows that no one in this country should have to lay in bed at night staring at the ceiling wondering, “what will I do if she gets breast cancer?” or “if he has a heart attack?” “Will I go bankrupt?” He knows there is no peace of mind if you cannot afford to care for a sick child or a family member because of a pre-existing condition, because you’ve reached a point where your health insurer says “no more,” or because you have to make a decision between putting food on the table and going to the doctor or filling a prescription.

In the coming months, Joe Biden will build on today’s plan by rolling out his proposals to tackle some of our greatest public health challenges – from reducing gun violence to curing devastating diseases as we know them like cancer, Alzheimer’s, diabetes, and addiction.

THE BIDEN PLAN TO PROTECT & BUILD ON THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

I. GIVE EVERY AMERICAN ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HEALTH INSURANCE

From the time right before the Affordable Care Act’s key coverage-related policies went into effect to the last full year of the Obama-Biden Administration, 2016, the number of Americans lacking health insurance fell from 44 million to 27 million – an almost 40% drop. But President Trump’s persistent efforts to sabotage Obamacare through executive action, after failing in his efforts to repeal it through Congress, have started to reverse this progress. Since 2016, the number of uninsured Americans has increased by roughly 1.4 million.

As president, Biden will stop this reversal of the progress made by Obamacare. And he won’t stop there. He’ll also build on the Affordable Care Act with a plan to insure more than an estimated 97% of Americans. Here’s how:

  • Giving Americans a new choice, a public health insurance option like Medicare. If your insurance company isn’t doing right by you, you should have another, better choice. Whether you’re covered through your employer, buying your insurance on your own, or going without coverage altogether, the Biden Plan will give you the choice to purchase a public health insurance option like Medicare. As in Medicare, the Biden public option will reduce costs for patients by negotiating lower prices from hospitals and other health care providers. It also will better coordinate among all of a patient’s doctors to improve the efficacy and quality of their care, and cover primary care without any co-payments. And it will bring relief to small businesses struggling to afford coverage for their employees.
  • Increasing the value of tax credits to lower premiums and extend coverage to more working Americans. Today, families that make between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level may receive a tax credit to reduce how much they have to pay for health insurance on the individual marketplace. The dollar amount of the financial assistance is calculated to ensure each family does not have to pay more than a certain percentage of their income on a silver (medium generosity) plan. But, these shares of income are too high and silver plans’ deductibles are too high. Additionally, many families making more than 400% of the federal poverty level (about $50,000 for a single person and $100,000 for a family of four), and thus not qualifying for financial assistance, still struggle to afford health insurance. The Biden Plan will help middle class families by eliminating the 400% income cap on tax credit eligibility and lowering the limit on the cost of coverage from 9.86% of income to 8.5%. This means that no family buying insurance on the individual marketplace, regardless of income, will have to spend more than 8.5% of their income on health insurance. Additionally, the Biden Plan will increase the size of tax credits by calculating them based on the cost of a more generous gold plan, rather than a silver plan. This will give more families the ability to afford more generous coverage, with lower deductibles and out-of-pocket costs.
  • Expanding coverage to low-income Americans. Access to affordable health insurance shouldn’t depend on your state’s politics. But today, state politics is getting in the way of coverage for millions of low-income Americans. Governors and state legislatures in 14 states have refused to take up the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of Medicaid eligibility, denying access to Medicaid for an estimated 4.9 million adults. Biden’s plan will ensure these individuals get covered by offering premium-free access to the public option for those 4.9 million individuals who would be eligible for Medicaid but for their state’s inaction, and making sure their public option covers the full scope of Medicaid benefits. States that have already expanded Medicaid will have the choice of moving the expansion population to the premium-free public option as long as the states continue to pay their current share of the cost of covering those individuals. Additionally, Biden will ensure people making below 138% of the federal poverty level get covered. He’ll do this by automatically enrolling these individuals when they interact with certain institutions (such as public schools) or other programs for low-income populations (such as SNAP).Learn more about how Biden’s plan for health care benefits communities of color >>

II. PROVIDE THE PEACE OF MIND OF AFFORDABLE, QUALITY HEALTH CARE AND A LESS COMPLEX HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

Today, even for people with health insurance, our health care system is too expensive and too hard to navigate. The Biden Plan will not only provide coverage for uninsured Americans, it will also make health care more affordable and less complex for all.

The plan’s elements described above will help reduce the cost of health insurance and health care for those already insured in the following ways:

  • All Americans will have a new, more affordable option. The public option, like Medicare, will negotiate prices with providers, providing a more affordable option for many Americans who today find their health insurance too expensive.
  • Middle class families will get a premium tax credit to help them pay for coverage. For example, take a family of four with an income of $110,000 per year. If they currently get insurance on the individual marketplace, because their premium will now be capped at 8.5% of their income, under the Biden Plan they will save an estimated $750 per month on insurance alone. That’s cutting their premiums almost in half. If a family is covered by their employer but can get a better deal with the 8.5% premium cap, they can switch to a plan on the individual marketplace, too.
  • Premium tax credits will be calculated to help more families afford better coverage with lower deductibles. Because the premium tax credits will now be calculated based on the price of a more generous gold plan, families will be able to purchase a plan with a lower deductible and lower out-of-pocket spending. That means many families will see their overall annual health care spending go down.

The Biden Plan has several additional proposals aimed directly at cutting the cost of health care and making the health care system less complex to navigate. The Biden Plan will:

  • Stop “surprise billing.” Consumers trying to lower their health care spending often try to choose an in-network provider. But sometimes patients are unaware they are receiving care from an out-of-network provider and a big, surprise bill. “Surprise medical billing” could occur, for example, if you go to an in-network hospital but don’t realize a specialist at that hospital is not part of your health plan. The Biden Plan will bar health care providers from charging patients out-of-network rates when the patient doesn’t have control over which provider the patient sees (for example, during a hospitalization).
  • Tackle market concentration across our health care system. The concentration of market power in the hands of a few corporations is occurring throughout our health care system, and this lack of competition is driving up prices for consumers. The Biden Administration will aggressively use its existing antitrust authority to address this problem.
  • Lower costs and improve health outcomes by partnering with the health care workforce. The Biden Administration will partner with health care workers and accelerate the testing and deployment of innovative solutions that improve quality of care and increase wages for low-wage health care workers, like home care workers.

III. STAND UP TO ABUSE OF POWER BY PRESCRIPTION DRUG CORPORATIONS

Too many Americans cannot afford their prescription drugs, and prescription drug corporations are profiteering off of the pocketbooks of sick individuals. The Biden Plan will put a stop to runaway drug prices and the profiteering of the drug industry by:

  • Repealing the outrageous exception allowing drug corporations to avoid negotiating with Medicare over drug prices. Because Medicare covers so many Americans, it has significant leverage to negotiate lower prices for its beneficiaries. And it does so for hospitals and other providers participating in the program, but not drug manufacturers. Drug manufacturers not facing any competition, therefore, can charge whatever price they choose to set. There’s no justification for this except the power of prescription drug lobbying. The Biden Plan will repeal the existing law explicitly barring Medicare from negotiating lower prices with drug corporations.
  • Limiting launch prices for drugs that face no competition and are being abusively priced by manufacturers. Through his work on the Cancer Moonshot, Biden understands that the future of pharmacological interventions is not traditional chemical drugs but specialized biotech drugs that will have little to no competition to keep prices in check. Without competition, we need a new approach for keeping the prices of these drugs down. For these cases where new specialty drugs without competition are being launched, under the Biden Plan the Secretary of Health and Human Services will establish an independent review board to assess their value. The board will recommend a reasonable price, based on the average price in other countries (a process called external reference pricing) or, if the drug is entering the U.S. market first, based on an evaluation by the independent board members. This reasonable price will be the rate Medicare and the public option will pay. In addition, the Biden Plan will allow private plans participating in the individual marketplace to access a similar rate.
  • Limiting price increases for all brand, biotech, and abusively priced generic drugs to inflation. As a condition of participation in the Medicare program and public option, all brand, biotech, and abusively priced generic drugs will be prohibited from increasing their prices more than the general inflation rate. The Biden Plan will also impose a tax penalty on drug manufacturers that increase the costs of their brand, biotech, or abusively priced generic over the general inflation rate.
  • Allowing consumers to buy prescription drugs from other countries. To create more competition for U.S. drug corporations, the Biden Plan will allow consumers to import prescription drugs from other countries, as long as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has certified that those drugs are safe.
  • Improving the supply of quality generics. Generics help reduce health care spending, but brand drug corporations have succeeded in preserving a number of strategies to help them delay the entrance of a generic into the market even after the patent has expired. The Biden Plan supports numerous proposals to accelerate the development of safe generics, such as Senator Patrick Leahy’s proposal to make sure generic manufacturers have access to a sample.

IV. ENSURE HEALTH CARE IS A RIGHT FOR ALL, NOT A PRIVILEGE FOR JUST A FEW

Joe Biden believes that every American – regardless of gender, race, income, sexual orientation, or zip code – should have access to affordable and quality health care. Yet racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and other forms of discrimination permeate our health care system just as in every other part of society. As president, Biden will be a champion for improving access to health care and the health of all by:

  • Expanding access to contraception and protect the constitutional right to an abortion. The Affordable Care Act made historic progress by ensuring access to free preventive care, including contraception. The Biden Plan will build on that progress. Vice President Biden supports repealing the Hyde Amendment because health care is a right that should not be dependent on one’s zip code or income. And, the public option will cover contraception and a woman’s constitutional right to choose. In addition, the Biden Plan will:
    • Reverse the Trump Administration and states’ all-out assault on women’s right to choose. As president, Biden will work to codify Roe v. Wade, and his Justice Department will do everything in its power to stop the rash of state laws that so blatantly violate the constitutional right to an abortion, such as so-called TRAP laws, parental notification requirements, mandatory waiting periods, and ultrasound requirements.
    • Restore federal funding for Planned Parenthood. The Obama-Biden administration fought Republican attacks on funding for Planned Parenthood again and again. As president, Biden will reissue guidance specifying that states cannot refuse Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood and other providers that refer for abortions or provide related information and reverse the Trump Administration’s rule preventing Planned Parenthood and certain other family planning programs from obtaining Title X funds.
    • Just as the Obama-Biden Administration did,President Biden will rescind the Mexico City Policy (also referred to as the global gag rule) that President Trump reinstated and expanded. This rule currently bars the U.S. federal government from supporting important global health efforts – including for malaria and HIV/AIDS – in developing countries simply because the organizations providing that aid also offer information on abortion services.
  • Reducing our unacceptably high maternal mortality rate, which especially impacts people of color. Compared to other developed nations, the U.S. has the highest rate of deaths related to pregnancy and childbirth, and we are the only country experiencing an increase in this death rate. This problem is especially prevalent among black women, who experience a death rate from complications related to pregnancy that is more than three times higher than the rate for non-Hispanic white women. California came up with a strategy that halved the state’s maternal death rate. As president, Biden will take this strategy nationwide.
  • Defending health care protections for all, regardless of gender, gender identity, or sexual orientation. Before the Affordable Care Act, insurance companies could increase premiums merely due to someone’s gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity. Further, insurance companies could increase premiums or deny coverage altogether due to someone’s HIV status. Yet, President Trump is trying to walk back this progress. For example, he has proposed to once again allow health care providers and insurance companies to discriminate based on a patient’s gender identity or abortion history. President Biden will defend the rights of all people – regardless of gender, sexual orientation, gender identity – to have access to quality, affordable health care free from discrimination.
  • Doubling America’s investment in community health centers. Community health centers provide primary, prenatal, and other important care to underserved populations. The Biden Plan will double the federal investment in these centers, expanding access to high quality health care for the populations that need it most.

In the months ahead, Biden will put forward additional plans to tackle health challenges affecting specific communities, including access to health care in rural communities, gun violence, and opioid addiction.

SUPPORTING HEALTH, NOT REWARDING WEALTH

Joe Biden believes in rewarding work, not just wealth – and investing in hard-working Americans’ health, not protecting the most privileged Americans’ wealth. Warren Buffett said it best when he stated that he should not pay a lower tax rate than his secretary.

The Biden Plan will make health care a right by getting rid of capital gains tax loopholes for the super wealthy. Today, the very wealthy pay a tax rate of just 20% on long-term capital gains. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, the capital gains and dividends exclusion is the second largest tax expenditure in the entire tax code: $127 billion in fiscal year 2019 alone. As President, Biden will roll back the Trump rate cut for the very wealthy and restore the 39.6% top rate he helped restore when he negotiated an end to the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy in 2012. Biden’s capital gains reform will close the loopholes that allow the super wealthy to avoid taxes on capital gains altogether. The Biden plan will assure those making over $1 million will pay the top rate on capital gains, doubling the capital gains tax rate on the super wealthy.

 

Immigration

Donald Trump 

Immigration

President Trump has enforced immigration laws to protect American communities and American jobs.

Joe Biden 

THE BIDEN PLAN FOR SECURING OUR VALUES AS A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

It is a moral failing and a national shame when a father and his baby daughter drown seeking our shores. When children are locked away in overcrowded detention centers and the government seeks to keep them there indefinitely. When our government argues in court against giving those children toothbrushes and soap. When President Trump uses family separation as a weapon against desperate mothers, fathers, and children seeking safety and a better life. When he threatens massive raids that would break up families who have been in this country for years and targets people at sensitive locations like hospitals and schools. When children die while in custody due to lack of adequate care.

Trump has waged an unrelenting assault on our values and our history as a nation of immigrants.

It’s wrong, and it stops when Joe Biden is elected president.

Unless your ancestors were native to these shores, or forcibly enslaved and brought here as part of our original sin as a nation, most Americans can trace their family history back to a choice–a choice to leave behind everything that was familiar in search of new opportunities and a new life. Joe Biden understands that is an irrefutable source of our strength. Generations of immigrants have come to this country with little more than the clothes on their backs, the hope in their heart, and a desire to claim their own piece of the American Dream. It’s the reason we have constantly been able to renew ourselves, to grow better and stronger as a nation, and to meet new challenges. Immigration is essential to who we are as a nation, our core values, and our aspirations for our future. Under a Biden Administration, we will never turn our backs on who we are or that which makes us uniquely and proudly American. The United States deserves an immigration policy that reflects our highest values as a nation.

Today, our immigration system is under greater stress as a direct result of Trump’s misguided policies, even as he has failed to invest in smarter border technology that would improve our cargo screening.

His obsession with building a wall does nothing to address security challenges while costing taxpayers billions of dollars. Most contraband comes in through our legal ports of entry. It’s estimated that nearly half of the undocumented people living in the U.S. today have overstayed a visa, not crossed a border illegally. Families fleeing the violence in Central America are voluntarily presenting themselves to border patrol officials. And the real threats to our security–drug cartels and human traffickers–can more easily evade enforcement efforts because Trump has misallocated resources into bullying legitimate asylum seekers. Trump fundamentally misunderstands how to keep America safe because he cares more about governing through fear and division than common sense solutions.

Trump’s policies are also bad for our economy. For generations, immigrants have fortified our most valuable competitive advantage–our spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship. Research suggests that “the total annual contribution of foreign-born workers is roughly $2 trillion.” Key sectors of the U.S. economy, from agriculture to technology, rely on immigration. Working-age immigrants keep our economy growing, our communities thriving, and country moving forward.

The challenges we face will not be solved by a constitutionally dubious “national emergency” to build a wall, by separating families, or by denying asylum to people fleeing persecution and violence. Addressing the Trump-created humanitarian crisis at our border, bringing our nation together, reasserting our core values, and reforming our immigration system will require real leadership and real solutions. Biden is prepared on day one to deliver both.

As president, Biden will forcefully pursue policies that safeguard our security, provide a fair and just system that helps to grow and enhance our economy, and secure our cherished values. He will:

Take urgent action to undo Trump’s damage and reclaim America’s values
Modernize America’s immigration system
Welcome immigrants in our communities
Reassert America’s commitment to asylum-seekers and refugees
Tackle the root causes of irregular migration
Implement effective border screening

The Biden Commitment to a Fair and Humane Immigration System

Joe Biden understands the pain felt by every family across the U.S. that has had a loved one removed from the country, including under the Obama-Biden Administration, and he believes we must do better to uphold our laws humanely and preserve the dignity of immigrant families, refugees, and asylum-seekers.

The Obama-Biden Administration strongly supported the bipartisan comprehensive immigration solution that passed the Senate in 2013 and which would have put our country’s immigration policies on a much stronger footing. When the Republican House refused to even bring that bill to a vote, the Administration took action to fundamentally change the course of our nation’s immigration policies, offering relief and stability to hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants who contribute to our communities every single day.

As Vice President, Biden championed the creation and expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program; the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) program; the Central American Minors program, which allowed parents with legal status in the U.S. to apply to bring their children up from Central America to live with them; and the creation of a White House task force to support new Americans and help them integrate into their new homes and communities.

In a departure from their predecessors, the Obama-Biden administration took steps to prioritize enforcement resources on removing threats to national security and public safety, not families. It also issued guidance designed to end mass work-place raids and to prevent enforcement activities at sensitive locations such as schools, hospitals, and places of worship.

Critically, the Obama-Biden administration recognized that irregular migration from the Northern Triangle countries of Central America cannot be effectively addressed if solutions only focus on our southern border. The better answer lies in addressing the root causes that push desperate people to flee their homes in the first place: violence and insecurity, lack of economic opportunity, and corrupt governance. As Vice President, Biden spearheaded the administration’s efforts in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras–bringing high-level attention to these issues and securing bipartisan support for a $750 million aid package to help the Northern Triangle countries implement critical, concrete reforms. These efforts were beginning to deliver results and reduce migration rates until Trump froze the majority of the funding, began his campaign to terrorize immigrants and assault the dignity of the Latino community, and created the current humanitarian crisis at our border with his irresponsible and inhumane policies.

As president, Biden will finish the work of building a fair and humane immigration system–restoring the progress Trump has cruelly undone and taking it further. He will secure our border, while ensuring the dignity of migrants and upholding their legal right to seek asylum. He will enforce our laws without targeting communities, violating due process, or tearing apart families. He will ensure our values are squarely at the center of our immigration and enforcement policies.
Take Urgent Action to Undo Trump’s Damage and Reclaim America’s Values

The next president will need to take urgent action to end the Trump Administration’s draconian policies, grounded in fear and racism rather than fact, work to heal the wounds inflicted on immigrant communities, and restore America’s moral leadership. As president, Biden will move immediately to ensure that the U.S. meets its responsibilities as both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants.

See post for more info.

 

Infrastructure

Donald Trump 

Infrastructure

The program will use outcome-driven planning efforts and capital improvements to rebuild and modernize rural infrastructure.
Strong rural infrastructure enhances regional connectivity, grows small business and increases employment opportunity for those living in rural communities.
The Trump Administration allocated $50 billion to empower rural America to address the infrastructure needs of their communities

80 percent of the Rural Infrastructure Program funds will go directly to the governor of each state as determined by a formula.
20 percent of the Rural Infrastructure Program funds will be provided to selected states that apply for Rural Performance Grants.
President Trump’s plan provides states the flexibility they need to address the unique needs of each community.

The federal funding provided by the president’s plan will not be awarded in pre-packaged, asset-specific amounts, as is often the case with federal programs, giving states the freedom to spend the money where it’s needed most.
Instead, funds provided under the president’s proposal will go directly to the governor’s office of the state receiving funds allowing governors to make investments based on the individual infrastructure needs of their communities.
Transportation projects which will rebuild roads, bridges, railways, and other vital infrastructure.
Broadband deployment projects which will improve access for rural communities.
Water and waste projects to help ensure rural families have access to clean water.
Power and electric projects to provide rural areas with reliable, affordable power.
Water resources projects to better manage flood risk and improve rural water supplies and waterways.

Joe Biden 

Joe Biden is running for president to rebuild the middle class—and this time make sure everyone comes along. Toward that end, Biden is calling for a transformational investment in our country’s infrastructure and future: $1.3 trillion over ten years, to equip the American middle class to compete and win in the global economy, to move the U.S. to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, and to ensure that cities, towns, and rural areas all across our country share in that growth.

MAKE UNPRECEDENTED INVESTMENTS IN OUR INFRASTRUCTURE TO BOLSTER THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE MIDDLE CLASS 

Our nation’s infrastructure is literally crumbling. It is unacceptable that one in five miles of our highways are in “poor condition,” that tens of millions of Americans lack access to high-speed broadband, and that our public schools have repeatedly earned a D+ grade from the American Society of Civil Engineers. We are the world’s richest nation, but rank just 10th in the overall quality of our infrastructure, according to the World Economic Forum.

During his 2016 presidential campaign, President Trump said he’d change that. He has been promising an infrastructure plan since his earliest days in office and keeps holding “Infrastructure Weeks”—but has failed to actually deliver results. Instead, Trump has focused on privatizing construction projects to benefit his wealthy friends, leaving communities across the country suffering and our nation falling behind.

Biden will revitalize America’s infrastructure and make us more competitive with the rest of the world, while also creating and sustaining quality, middle-class jobs at home. Every one of Biden’s investments in infrastructure will further the following three goals:

  • Create good, union jobs that expand the middle class. American workers should build American infrastructure and manufacture all the materials that go into it, and all of these workers must have the option to join a union and collectively bargain. Building on his plan to strengthen worker organizing, collective bargaining, and unions, President Biden will propose infrastructure legislation that incorporates labor provisions contained in Senator Merkley’s Good Jobs for 21st Century Energy Act, adopting all basic labor protections, ensuring that all investments meet Davis-Bacon wage guidelines, and banning anti-worker provisions like forced arbitration and the overuse of temporary staffing agencies. He will require federally funded projects to source materials in the U.S., to employ workers trained in registered apprenticeship programs, and to prioritize Project Labor and Community Workforce Agreements in federal procurement procedures. Biden’s proposal will make sure that national infrastructure investments create millions of middle-class jobs, benefiting union and non-union workers across industries. 
  • Build resilient infrastructure and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We’ve already felt the devastating impacts of climate change—from raging wildfires to more frequent and more severe hurricanes to unprecedented floods. Every federal dollar spent on rebuilding our infrastructure during the Biden Administration will be used to prevent, reduce, and withstand the impacts of this climate crisis. If we transform our modes of transportation and the sources of energy that power them, we can make real progress toward reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. For that reason, Biden will invest in expanded public transit systems, giving more Americans an affordable, efficient way to get around without their cars. He will help state and local governments plan for the widespread adoption of electric cars, and will coordinate and invest in the construction of a national electric-vehicle charging network to power them. Biden will also push to build a national high-speed rail network; to accelerate the development of low-carbon aviation and shipping technology; and to fortify our infrastructure to withstand the effects of climate change. And, he will give homeowners and businesses new incentives to retrofit their buildings to reduce their carbon footprints. Across these efforts, Biden will also work with state and local governments and the private sector to modernize our nation’s electric grid, making it smarter, more resilient, and ready to meet the changing needs of a net-zero greenhouse-gas-emissions economy. The impacts of climate change will continue to vary by region, and the people living in each area must be part of developing the solutions to best address their unique challenges.
  • Revitalize communities in every corner of the country so that no one is left behind.  Whether in our biggest cities or our smallest towns, too many low-income communities are bearing the brunt of our nation’s decaying infrastructure. Biden will boost federal investments in those neighborhoods to ensure that every American has access to clean drinking water, well-paved roads, high-speed broadband, safe schools, and affordable housing.

TRANSPORTATION

Highways, Roads, & Bridges

  • Jump-start the repair of our highways, roads, and bridges. Almost 20% of our roads are in poor condition, and there is a backlog of hundreds of billions of dollars of investment. Americans in cities lose more than 8.8 billion hours to traffic each year—an average 54 hours a year per commuter. Biden will propose to immediately spend $50 billion over the first year of his Administration to kickstart the process of repairing our existing roads, highways, and bridges. In addition to sending these funds to states, some of the dollars will go directly to cities and towns that own and run most of our roads. Biden will also expedite permitting, so that projects can break ground faster.
  • Make American roads the world’s safest. The federal government must lead the way in making our streets and highways safer. Under President Biden, the U.S. Department of Transportation will work with cities around the country to build “complete streets,” designed to help drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, and others safely share the road. Biden will also work with Congress to increase federal funding for key safety initiatives like the Highway Safety Improvement Program; and to encourage state and local governments to explore new technologies that can reduce accidents, including “smart” pavement, vehicle-to-infrastructure communication, connected intersections, and other infrastructure-related innovations. 
  • Invest in historically marginalized communities and bring everyone to the table for transportation planning. Biden’s pledge to bring Americans together will be reflected in his Administration’s approach to infrastructure. Not only will he make unprecedented investments in rebuilding and connecting historically underserved areas to better transportation options, he will make sure that our highway, road, transit, and air systems never again divide us. As president, Biden will emphasize a robust public engagement process in planning all new transportation projects. He will create a new Community Restoration Fund, specifically for neighborhoods where historic transportation investments cut people off from jobs, schools, and businesses. And, he will work to make sure towns and cities directly receive a portion of existing federal transportation investments.
  • Pair new infrastructure investments with new training programs. To help develop the workforce that will build the new backbone of our country, Biden will work with Congress and the U.S. Department of Labor to fund new Apprenticeship Readiness Programs that specifically target veterans, women, and communities of color to enter the construction trades and that are connected to Registered Apprenticeships.  Additionally, Biden will work to further support community colleges that have articulation agreements with Registered Apprenticeship Programs. This, in conjunction with promoting Project Labor and Community Workforce Agreements, will ensure that infrastructure investments are paired with public and private investments in Pre-Apprenticeship training and other recruitment strategies that support the Registered Apprenticeship system, promote meaningful construction careers, and will ensure that the benefits of these investments are broadly shared. This effort will also develop a diverse and local workforce that will strengthen communities as we rebuild our physical infrastructure.
  • Stabilize the Highway Trust Fund. The Highway Trust Fund has for far too long been grossly underfunded. Biden will ensure new revenues are secured to stabilize the Highway Trust Fund in order to build roads, bridges, and public transportation projects.
Speed the Transition to Low- and No-Carbon Vehicles

  • Speed the transition to electric vehicles. Even with major investments in transit and planning, many Americans will still depend on their cars and trucks. To reach net-zero emissions, we have to make it much easier for them to own and use electric vehicles. Biden will work to remove today’s biggest barriers to their use, easing concerns about price, range, and access to charging stations. As president, he will restore the full electric-vehicle tax credit, to encourage American families to buy electric cars for their personal use – and to incentivize American businesses to build or shift their existing fleets to electric vehicles. He will also ensure that the U.S. Department of Energy invests $5 billion over five years in battery and energy storage technology, to spur breakthroughs that can boost the range and slash the price of electric cars. And, he will enact policies to promote domestic manufacturing of electric vehicles. Biden will also work with Congress, the private sector, labor unions, mayors, and governors to build a national electric charging system of 500,000 public charging outlets, so that by 2030, Americans will be able to drive anywhere in the United States in an electric car. Under his Administration, the U.S. Department of Transportation will also provide an additional $1 billion per year in new grants to ensure that those charging stations are installed by certified technicians, promoting high-paying jobs and benefits. Finally, Biden will convene the U.S. Departments of Energy and Transportation to coordinate on special demonstration projects, for example testing new highways that can charge electric cars while in transit. The Departments will provide grants to cities, towns, and counties that are open to piloting new kinds of charging infrastructure, building on programs like the Department of Energy’s Transportation Electrification Project and Clean Cities Initiative, which Biden oversaw as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
  • Launch a new generation of low-carbon trucking, shipping, and aviation technologies. Long-haul trucking, oceanic shipping, and global aviation also contribute heavily to transit emissions. As part of Biden’s plan to invest $400 billion over 10 years in clean energy research and innovation, his administration will develop a federal research program focused on further reducing the cost of biofuels; increasing their energy density; and developing more efficient engines that can power long-haul trucks, planes, and ships, to keep global commerce moving while reaching net-zero emissions by 2050. In addition, the Biden Administration will work with the International Civil Aviation Organization and the International Maritime Organization to share those technologies with other nations.

Rail

  • Spark the second great railroad revolution. Two centuries ago, the first great railroad expansion drove our industrial revolution. Today, the U.S. is lagging behind Europe and China in rail safety and speed. A 21st-century passenger rail system that connects people across our nation is essential to our competitiveness, to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and to giving more Americans the freedom and flexibility to travel. Biden will make sure that America has the cleanest, safest, and fastest rail system in the world—for both passengers and freight. As president, he will invest in high-speed rail. He’ll start by putting the Northeast Corridor on higher speeds and shrinking the travel time from D.C. to New York by half – and build in conjunction with it a new, safer Hudson River Tunnel. He will make progress toward the completion of the California High Speed Rail project. He will expand the Northeast Corridor to the fast-growing South. Across the Midwest and the Great West, he will begin the construction of an end-to-end high speed rail system that will connect the coasts, unlocking new, affordable access for every American. A Biden Administration will also support freight projects, including a truck and rail-transit bridge linking Oregon to Washington State, and Chicago’s CREATE project, which has the potential to halve transit times for goods moving across the country. Overall, Biden’s rail revolution will reduce pollution, connect workers to good jobs, slash commute times, and spur investment in communities that will now be better linked to major metropolitan areas. To speed that work, Biden will tap existing federal grant and loan programs at the U.S. Department of Transportation, and improve and streamline the loan process.
  • Electrify the rail system. As president, Biden will work with Amtrak and private freight rail companies to further electrify the rail system, reducing diesel fuel emissions.

Transit and Regional Planning

  • Offer tens of millions of Americans new transportation options. Outside major cities, most Americans do not have access to high-quality, reliable public transportation; and within urban areas, it’s often in need of repair. As a result, workers and families rely on cars, which can be a big financial burden, clog roadways, and – along with light-duty trucks – significantly increase U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. As president, Biden will aim to provide all Americans in municipalities of more than 100,000 people with quality public transportation by 2030. To that end, he’ll increase flexible federal investments, helping cities and towns to install light rail networks and to improve existing transit and bus lines. He’ll also help them to invest in infrastructure for pedestrians, cyclists, and riders of e-scooters and other micro-mobility vehicles. And, Biden will work to make sure that new, fast-growing areas are designed and built with public transit in mind. Specifically, he will create a new program that gives rapidly expanding communities the resources to build in public transit options from the start.
  • Reduce congestion by working with metropolitan regions to plan smarter growth. Biden will empower city, county, regional, and state leaders to explore new, smarter, climate-friendly strategies to help reduce average commute times and build more vibrant main streets. Specifically, Biden will create a competitive grant program to help leaders rethink and redesign regional transportation systems, to get commuters where they are going safer, faster, and more efficiently. At the same time, Biden will boost highway funding by 10%, and allocate the new funding to states that embrace smart climate design and pollution reduction, incentivizing them to invest in greenhouse gas reduction. States will also be free to use existing highway funding for alternative transportation options.
  • Connect workers to jobs. For too many low-income workers, the cost of transportation and time it takes them to commute to work every day are significant barriers. As president, Biden will dedicate an additional $10 billion over 10 years specifically for transit projects that serve high-poverty areas with limited transportation options, so that workers seeking a better life won’t have to spend as much getting to their jobs.

Smart Cities

  • Encourage innovation and launch smarter cities. Transportation patterns are changing across the country. New modes of car ownership, the explosive growth of ride-hailing and ride-sharing services, and the rapid adoption of electric scooters and bike-share programs are giving Americans new ways to move. But the biggest disruption lies ahead: self-driving cars. Citizens will benefit if cities can adapt to those new technologies – for example, by reshaping streets to protect cyclists and scooters, connecting transit systems to last-mile solutions like ride-shares and e-scooters, or using real-time data to manage traffic flows. As president, Biden will build on the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Smart City Challenge by launching a yearly $1 billion competitive grant program to help five cities pilot new planning strategies and smart-city technologies that can serve as models for the country. Biden will also direct the Department to work with labor unions to develop a plan to help workers impacted by this automation find high-paying, quality jobs.

Aviation

  • Make our airports the best in the world. Aviation and airports are major drivers for the U.S. economy, but our airports are in desperate need of improvement. As president, Biden will double funding for airports through the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Airport Improvement Program, and launch a new competitive grant program for major airport renovation projects. At the same time, he’ll also make sure that the U.S. maintains the world’s safest aviation system, working with the FAA to fully implement its NextGen technology system, to improve safety, modernize our airspace, and reduce delays and cancellations. Biden will also ensure that U.S. airlines’ operating, repair, and maintenance facilities overseas adhere to our nation’s highest safety standards.

Freight

  • Invest in freight infrastructure, including inland waterways, freight corridors, freight rail, transfer facilities, and ports. From early-19th century canals, to late-19th century railroads, to 20th-century highways, innovations in transportation infrastructure have powered our economy, carrying the freight that drives our nation forward. Today, though, our freight system is especially outdated. Freight railroads run through 100-year-old tunnels too small for the shipping containers they should be carrying. Highways and bridges buckle under trucks’ weight, and many ports are too shallow for modern shipping vessels. As president, Biden will change that. He will roughly double funding for key competitive grant programs – like the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Transportation Discretionary Grants program (formerly known as Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery, or TIGER) and Infrastructure For Rebuilding America (INFRA) – from $1.8 billion to $3.5 billion a year. These programs leverage local, state, and private investment, and create innovative transportation models that can be replicated nationwide. Biden will also work closely with American manufacturers to prioritize investments that will improve supply chains and distribution, reduce shipping costs, and boost U.S. exports. And he will also increase funding for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by $2.5 billion per year, supporting infrastructure projects to keep goods moving quickly through our ports and waterways. This will include increased federal funding for lock modernization projects on inland waterways.
  • Support American port infrastructure. Biden will ensure that all fees collected for the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund are used to improve and rebuild American ports of entry. And he’ll work with U.S. ports and labor unions to ensure that cargo bound for the U.S. is offloaded in the U.S., and not in Canadian ports to avoid harbor taxes.

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE

  • Invest in the resiliency of our infrastructure. Communities around the country are already experiencing the impact of climate change. While the Trump Administration has abdicated global climate leadership, America’s mayors and other local leaders have stepped up to build smarter cities that can withstand storms, floods, heat, wildfires, sea level rise, and more. A Biden Administration will give those communities a true partner in the White House again, advancing their efforts and helping to create new, well-paying jobs to improve climate resiliency and invest in our economic future. As president, Biden will convene top innovators to help design common-sense zoning and building codes, and to help communities build and rebuild before and after natural disasters and other shocks and stresses. Biden will also invest in and help train people for well-paying jobs in climate resiliency industries. These include coastal restoration, resilient infrastructure design, construction and evaluation (for example, building bridges to withstand high winds and roads that don’t wash out during floods), natural solutions (for example, planting trees on a large scale to combat urban heat and its negative health impacts), and technological solutions. These industries have been shown to improve communities’ resilience – and they’re all opportunities for job creation and economic growth.

ENERGY

  • Invest in energy infrastructure for a 100% clean energy economyThe transition to a clean energy economy won’t just require new technologies and vehicles, it will entail a major expansion of renewable energy production and a dramatic evolution of our electric grid – not only reducing emissions, but creating millions of new jobs. As president, Biden will partner with utilities and regulators around the country to build a 21st-century power grid, able to distribute clean energy reliably and safely to households and businesses across the United States. Specifically, he will appoint commissioners to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission who will drive market reforms, like expanding regional electric markets, integrating renewables, building in demand-response, and promoting long-term infrastructure planning to achieve a 100% clean energy economy and net-zero emissions by 2050. The Biden Administration will also work with cities, states, and utilities to install advanced metering equipment; to deploy electric vehicle charging infrastructure; and to upgrade transmission lines to support larger regional electric markets that can distribute renewably-generated electricity from the point of generation to end users. Finally, Biden will work with the U.S. Department of Energy to advance large-scale storage demonstration projects, including pilots that use electric vehicles as mobile energy storage units.
  • Make our buildings more energy efficient. As president, Biden will work with Congress to electrify the building sector and increase energy efficiency in a range of ways. For homeowners, he’ll reinstate tax credits for residential energy efficiency. For businesses, he’ll expand tax deductions for energy retrofits, smart metering systems, and other emissions-reducing investments in commercial buildings. His administration will also boost investment in low-income weatherization programs and in key technologies like electric heat pumps; and it will work with local and state governments and the private sector to expand the utilization of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE). Biden will also reinstate the solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC), slated to expire in two years; and will construct net-zero-carbon federal buildings, to serve as a model for state and local governments and the private sector. 

WATER

  • Replace aging pipes and invest in water infrastructure so every American has clean drinking water. Americans deserve clean, reliable drinking water in their homes. But across the country, pipes and treatment plants are aging into obsolescence, and in places like Flint, Michigan, Merrimack, New Hampshire, and Martin County, Kentucky, drinking water is endangering public health. Biden will double federal investments in clean drinking water and water infrastructure, and focus new funding on low-income rural, suburban, and urban areas that are struggling to replace pipes and treatment facilities – and especially on communities at high risk of lead or other kinds of contamination. In addition, Biden will reduce the matching funds required of local governments that don’t have the taxbase to be able to afford borrowing to repair their water systems.
  • Monitor for lead and other contaminants and hold polluters accountable. As president, Biden will require state and local governments to monitor their water systems for lead and other contaminants, and he will provide them with the resources to do so. Biden will also work with the EPA and the Justice Department to hold companies that pollute our waterways accountable, aggressively enforcing existing regulations and prosecuting any violations. Corporations and their executives cannot break the law and expect to get away with it.
  • Invest in water technology. New technologies present real opportunities to use existing water resources more efficiently, and to reduce the cost and energy required to generate new water supplies, for example through desalination. As president, Biden will increase federal funding for water technology research and use the convening power of the White House to spur private-sector innovation. 

BROADBAND

  • Bring broadband to every American household. In a 21st century economy, Americans need broadband. Without it, students face substantial barriers to doing their homework and the sick and elderly can’t access remote health care. Broadband is a prerequisite for starting a business, working remotely, accessing government resources, and engaging in public debate. But today, more than 21 million Americans still don’t have broadband; and many more can’t afford it. This “digital divide” is particularly wide for low-income, older, and rural Americans, as well as for Americans living on tribal lands. As president, Biden will close the digital divide. First, he will invest $20 billion in rural broadband infrastructure; and triple funding to expand broadband access in rural areas, and to ensure that the work of installing broadband provides high-paying jobs with benefits. Biden will also direct the federal government – especially the U.S. National Telecommunications and Information Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture – to support cities and towns that want to build municipally-owned broadband networks. He will encourage competition among providers, to increase speeds and decrease prices in urban, suburban, and rural areas. And to encourage those providers to invest in further extending service to rural communities and tribal areas, Biden will make available key federally-controlled telecom resources, like towers, poles, and rights-of-way. Biden will also work with the FCC to reform its Lifeline program, increasing the number of participating broadband providers, reducing fraud and abuse, and ultimately offering more low-income Americans the subsidies needed to access high-speed internet. Finally, Biden will work with Congress to pass the Digital Equity Act, to help communities tackle the digital divide.

SCHOOLS

  • Invest $100 billion to modernize our nation’s schools. American public school facilities received a grade of D+ from the American Society of Civil Engineers. In fact, each year the U.S. underfunds school infrastructure by $46 billion, resulting in schools that are outdated, unsafe, unfit, and – in some cases – making kids and educators sick. In line with the Rebuild America’s Schools Act, backed by the House Education Committee, President Biden will invest $100 billion in improving public school buildings. First and foremost, those funds will be used to address health risks, so that going to school or working at one never makes anyone sick. Additional funds will be used to build cutting-edge, energy-efficient, innovative schools, with technology and labs to prepare our students for the jobs of the future.
Build Transformational ProjectsHistorically, major infrastructure projects, from the Erie Canal to the Hoover Dam, reshaped not just a single town or city, but a whole region of our country. These projects – and their benefits – often extend across state lines, making them hard for any one state government to plan, fund, or execute. That’s why Biden is proposing a new $40 billion, 10-year Transformational Projects Fund, to provide significant discretionary grants for projects too large and complex to be funded through existing infrastructure programs. The grants will be available for transportation, water, and energy projects, with allocations to the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Departments of Transportation, the Interior, and Energy. Projects might include a major new regional transportation system, a major port upgrade, or a new tunnel.

In the weeks ahead, Biden will put forward additional policies related to housing.

ENSURE GROWTH IS SHARED BY COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE COUNTRY 

Vice President Biden’s plan will spark a renaissance in cities, towns, and communities that have been forgotten for too long. It will attract private capital to all corners of the country, and provide funds for anchor institutions, including new research centers and hospitals. Biden will make critical investments so that every American has a chance to succeed, no matter their zip code.

A NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS INITIATIVE

  • Expand the New Markets Tax Credit, make the program permanent, and double Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) funding. The New Markets Tax Credit has helped draw tens of billions of dollars in new capital to low-income communities, providing tax credits to investors in community development organizations that support everything from supermarkets to real estate projects to manufacturing plants.  Biden will expand the program to provide $5 billion in support every year, and he will make the program permanent so communities can take the credit into account in their long-term planning. As part of his plan to reinvest in communities across the country, including in rural areas, Biden will also double funding for the Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund, which supports local, mission-driven financial institutions in low-income areas around the U.S. This builds on Biden’s proposal to support entrepreneurs in small towns and rural areas by expanding both the Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program and the number of Rural Business Investment Companies, to help rural businesses attract capital.
  • Double funding for the Economic Development Administration, to help underserved communities tap existing federal resources. Billions in federal aid is available for economic development goals like expanding access to broadband, setting up business incubators, and encouraging industry clusters in manufacturing or information technology. But, underserved communities often lack resources to navigate the complex grant application system in the first place. Throughout the Obama-Biden Administration’s work to support the resurgence of places like Detroit, it was clear that helping local leaders apply for federal aid is one of the most important ways to start turning around an economically depressed city. For that reason, Biden will double funding for the Economic Development Administration, an agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce devoted to economic development, and task it with creating a new division devoted to helping underserved communities apply for federal aid. This initiative complements Biden’s proposal for a new White House “StrikeForce” to assist rural communities in persistent poverty, and will help to ensure that every community can seek and receive the federal resources it needs to build a more prosperous economy.
  • Create a new Cities Revitalization Fund. Our nation must recommit to revitalizing American cities. As president, Biden will launch a new, $10 billion fund, coordinated through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and focused on creative revitalization projects in distressed cities – like redeveloping post-industrial waterfronts, energizing main street business districts, rehabbing public markets, and building new green public spaces. These communities have missed out on both private capital and necessary government funding for far too long. Under a Biden Administration, they will get the investment they need and deserve.
  • Fund anchor institutions in distressed areas. For many communities across the United States, anchor institutions serve as long-standing contributors to economic vitality. These institutions – which include hospitals, colleges and universities, and government administrative offices – can help to provide a reliable source of income and good-paying jobs, even in times of economic downturns; and can support small businesses and middle-class workers. Unfortunately, many communities have no viable anchor institution and miss out on the related economic and social benefits. Biden will create a new fund to support the establishment and revitalization of anchor institutions, with a competitive process to ensure that the most deserving communities win investment.
Fully Implement Congressman Clyburn’s 10-20-30 Plan To tackle persistent poverty in all communities, in both urban and rural America, Vice President Biden supports applying Congressman James Clyburn’s 10-20-30 formula to all federal programs. The formula would allocate 10% of funding to counties “where 20% or more of the population has been living below the poverty line for the last 30 years.”

REVITALIZE MANUFACTURING ACROSS THE COUNTRY 

  • Quadruple funding for the Manufacturing Extension Partnership. America’s small manufacturers need help. On the heels of the Trump Administration’s reckless trade wars, our country’s manufacturing sector has been thrown into a full-blown recession. Righting American manufacturing will require smarter, less erratic trade policies – but it also begins with giving small manufacturers the tools they need to succeed. One lifeline for thousands of them is the Manufacturing Extension Partnership, a program designed to provide small manufacturers with the technical expertise needed to compete in a global economy. While President Trump proposed fully cutting this program, Biden will quadruple its funding, to ensure that more small manufacturers can access the technical and business support it provides. 
  • Enact a national strategy to develop a low-carbon manufacturing sector in every state, boosting access to new technologies and skills, and helping small and large manufacturers upgrade their capabilities to have both competitive and low-carbon futures. This strategy will connect research universities, community colleges, incubators, manufacturing institutes, employers, unions, and state and local governments – alone or as part of a regional pact – and provide them with significant funding for a place-based plan to build a competitive, localized, low-carbon future in manufacturing. Industries ranging from textiles and machine tools, to metal fabrication or the most advanced manufacturing technologies, will be eligible for funding; and will be motivated to modernize, compete, create jobs, and move to a clean energy future. Allocated tax credits and subsidies will help businesses to upgrade equipment and processes, to invest in expanded or new factories, and to deploy low-carbon technologies – as long as all community stakeholders are included in the process. In cases where states feel that competitive pressures or climate change-related requirements may harm a local economy, Biden’s strategy will preemptively fund a more competitive or low-carbon manufacturing approach. Those preemptive efforts may include new economic strategies, or new federal funding for technology or manufacturing innovation centers. That support can particularly help green economy manufacturers, whether producing batteries for electric vehicles and energy storage, solar panels, or other advanced equipment; and it can also incentivize small manufacturers to use American-made materials, such as iron, steel, and intermediate manufactured products, in their production processes.
  • Establish a Manufacturing Communities Tax Credit. The Obama-Biden Administration proposed a $6 billion, three-year initiative to invest in communities that experienced mass layoffs or the closure of a major government institution. As president, Biden will adopt and expand this initiative, providing five years of funding for projects that boost local economic growth.

SPARK ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH IN EVERY COMMUNITY 

  • Double down on the State Small Business Credit Initiative. In 2010, the Obama-Biden Administration created the State Small Business Credit Initiative (SSBCI) to support small businesses. The program transfers funds to state small business lending initiatives, driving $10 billion in new lending for each $1 billion in SSBCI funds. Biden will extend the program through 2025 and double its federal funding to $3 billion, driving close to $30 billion of private sector investments to small businesses all told, especially those owned by women and people of color.
  • Establish a competitive grant program for new business startups outside of our biggest cities. To help redirect investments to more communities across the country – not just our biggest cities – Biden will enact legislation to provide $5 billion in funding to states with policies to encourage small business startups, for example by supporting the transfer of technology from public universities to the private sector, or by implementing training programs for new entrepreneurs.
JOE BIDEN: STEADY STEWARD OF THE BIGGEST INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT IN GENERATIONSAs Vice President, Biden oversaw the execution of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which poured more than $800 billion into infrastructure and stimulus spending, bringing the country back from the brink of depression.Biden made sure that taxpayer dollars were well spent, with less than 0.2% of awards generating investigations of fraud.

Investing in Middle Class Competitiveness, Not Rewarding Wealth

Every cent of Joe Biden’s $1.3 trillion investment in our nation’s infrastructure will be paid for by making sure the super-wealthy and corporations pay their fair share. Specifically, this investment will be offset by revenue raised through reversing the excesses of the Trump tax cuts for corporations; reducing incentives for tax havens, evasion, and outsourcing; ensuring corporations pay their fair share; closing other loopholes in our tax code that reward wealth, not work; and ending subsidies for fossil fuels.

 

Veterans

Donald Trump 

Veterans

President Trump is making sure the government fulfills its commitment to our country’s Veterans.
President Trump signed the Veterans Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act to allow senior officials in the Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) to fire failing employees and establish safeguards to protect whistleblowers.

Through 2018, more than 4,300 Veterans Affairs employees were removed, demoted, or suspended as a result of the Veterans Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act
In August 2017, after passing Congress unanimously, President Trump signed the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act.

This streamlined the lengthy process that veterans undergo when appealing disability benefits claims with the Veterans Affairs.
In August 2017, the President signed the Harry W. Colmery Veterans Educational Assistance Act, an important step in providing our nation’s heroes the support they have earned.

This funded the post-9/11 GI Bill, which provided educational benefits to veterans, service members, and their family members, including tuition, fees, books, housing, and additional costs.
The President signed the V.A. Choice and Quality Employment Act of 2017 to authorize $2.1 billion in additional funds for the Veterans Choice Program (VCP).

President Trump signed a bill to allow the V.A. to fire incompetent employees.
President Trump signed legislation to fully fund the popular V.A. Choice Program.
In August 2017, The President signed the V.A. Choice and Quality Employment Act of 2017 which authorized $2.1 billion in additional funds for the Veterans Choice Program (VCP).

Joe Biden 

 

Wikipedia

Presidential elections were held in the United States on November 3, 2020.[a] The Democratic ticket of former vice president Joe Biden and the junior U.S. senator from California Kamala Harris defeated the incumbent Republican president Donald Trump, and vice president Mike Pence.[9] The election took place against the backdrop of the global COVID-19 pandemic and related recession. The election saw the highest voter turnout by percentage since 1900. Biden received more than 81 million votes,[10] the most votes ever cast for a presidential candidate in U.S. history.[11]

In a competitive primary that featured the most candidates for any political party in the modern era of American politics, Biden secured the Democratic presidential nomination. Biden's running mate, Harris, became the first African-American, first Asian-American, and third female[d] vice presidential nominee on a major party ticket. Trump secured re-nomination, getting a total of 2,549 delegates, one of the most in presidential primary history, in the Republican primaries.[12] Jo Jorgensen secured the Libertarian presidential nomination with Spike Cohen as her running mate, and Howie Hawkins secured the Green presidential nomination with Angela Nicole Walker as his running mate.

The central issues of the election included the public health and economic impacts of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; civil unrest in reaction to the police murder of George Floyd and others; the Supreme Court following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett; and the future of the Affordable Care Act.[13] Due to the ongoing pandemic, a record number of ballots were cast early and by mail.[14] Thirty-eight states had over half of all votes cast using these methods, and only three states had fewer than 25%.[15]

Many more registered Democrats voted by mail than registered Republicans.[16][17] As a result of a large number of mail-in ballots, some swing states saw delays in vote counting and reporting; this led to major news outlets delaying their projection of Biden and Harris as the president-elect and vice president-elect until the morning of November 7, 2020. Major media networks tentatively call a state for a candidate once there is high statistical confidence that the outstanding vote would be unlikely to prevent the projected winner from ultimately winning that state.[18]

Biden received the majority in the Electoral College with 306 electoral votes, while Trump received 232. Trump was the first president to lose re-election since George H. W. Bush in 1992. Key to Biden's victory were his wins in the Democratic-leaning Rust Belt states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, which Trump narrowly carried in 2016 and whose combined 46 electoral votes were enough to swing the election to either candidate. Biden also became the first Democrat to win a presidential election in Georgia since 1992 and in Arizona since 1996, as well as Nebraska's 2nd congressional district since 2008.[19][20]

Before, during, and after Election Day, Trump and numerous other Republicans engaged in an aggressive and unprecedented[21] attempt to subvert the election and overturn the results,[22] falsely alleging widespread voter fraud and trying to influence the vote-counting process in swing states[23] in what has been described as an attempted self-coup d'état.[24][25] Attorney General William Barr and officials in each of the 50 states found no evidence of fraud (widespread or otherwise) or irregularities in the election.[26][27] Federal agencies overseeing election security said it was the most secure in American history.[28][29][30] The Trump campaign and its allies, including Republican members of Congress,[31] continued to attempt to overturn the results of the election by filing numerous lawsuits in several states (most of which were withdrawn or dismissed),[32] spreading conspiracy theories alleging fraud,[33] pressuring Republican state election officials (including, notably, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, in a phone call that later became widely publicized) and legislators to change results,[34] pressuring the Department of Justice to declare the election "corrupt" and intervene,[35][36] objecting to the Electoral College certification in Congress,[37][38] and refusing to cooperate with the presidential transition of Biden.[25] With Trump vowing that he would never concede the election and after exhorting his followers to "fight like hell",[39] a mob of Trump supporters attacked the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, during the joint session of Congress held to certify the Electoral College count.[40] On January 7, Trump acknowledged the incoming administration without mentioning Biden's name.[41] Biden and Harris were inaugurated on January 20, 2021; in a break from tradition, Trump did not attend his successor's inauguration.[42] Trump was indicted in August 2023 on four counts relating to conspiring to overturn the results, which were all dismissed in November 2024, following his reelection to the presidency.[43]

Both Trump and Biden ran for their party's nominations in the 2024 election, but Biden dropped out of the race in July 2024. Harris replaced him as presumptive Democratic nominee, with Minnesota governor Tim Walz as her running mate. The Harris/Walz ticket went on to lose to Trump and his running mate, Ohio senator JD Vance, making Trump the first president since Grover Cleveland in 1892 to be elected to two non-consecutive terms.

Background

Article Two of the Constitution of United States states that for a person to serve as president, the individual must be a natural-born US citizen, be at least 35 years old, and have been a US resident for at least 14 years. Candidates for the presidency typically seek the nomination of one of the various American political parties. Each party develops a method (such as a primary election) to choose the candidate the party deems best suited to run for the position. Primary elections are usually indirect elections where voters cast ballots for a slate of party delegates pledged to a particular candidate. The party's delegates then officially nominate a candidate to run on the party's behalf. The presidential nominee typically chooses a vice presidential running mate to form that party's ticket, which is then ratified by the delegates at the party's convention (except for the Libertarian Party, which nominates its vice-presidential candidate by delegate vote regardless of the presidential nominee's preference). The general election in November is also an indirect election, in which voters cast ballots for a slate of members of the Electoral College; these electors then directly elect the president and vice president.[44] If no candidate receives the minimum 270 electoral votes needed to win the election, the United States House of Representatives will select the president from among the three candidates who received the most electoral votes, and the United States Senate will select the vice president from among the candidates who received the two highest totals. The presidential election occurred simultaneously alongside elections for the House of Representatives, the Senate, and various state and local-level elections.[45]

The Maine Legislature passed a bill in August 2019 adopting ranked-choice voting (RCV) both for presidential primaries and for the general election.[46][47] Governor Janet Mills allowed the bill to become law without her signature, which delayed its taking effect until after the 2020 Democratic primary in March and made Maine the first state to use RCV for a presidential general election. The Maine Republican Party filed signatures for a veto referendum to preclude the use of RCV for the 2020 election, but Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap found there were insufficient valid signatures to qualify for the ballot. A challenge in Maine Superior Court was successful for the Maine Republican Party, but the Maine Supreme Judicial Court[48][49] stayed the ruling pending appeal on September 8, 2020.[50] Nevertheless, ballots began being printed later that day without the veto referendum and including RCV for the presidential election,[51][52] and the Court ruled in favor of the secretary of state on September 22, allowing RCV to be used.[53] An emergency appeal to the Supreme Court was denied on October 6.[54] The law continues the use of the congressional district method for the allocation of Maine's electors (Nebraska is the only other state that apportions its electoral votes this way).[55] While multiple rounds of vote counting were not needed due to a single candidate receiving a majority of first-choice votes statewide and in each district, use of RCV complicates interpretation of the national popular vote because voters are more likely to vote for third-party or independent candidates.[56]

On December 14, 2020, pledged electors for each candidate, known collectively as the United States Electoral College, gathered in their states' capitols to cast their official votes. Pursuant to the processes laid out by the Electoral Count Act of 1887, certificates of ascertainment listing the names of the electors and separate certificates recording their votes are distributed to various officials across the branches of government.[57][58][59] The newly elected Congress, with the Vice President in his role as Senate President presiding, met in a joint session to formally open the certificates and count the votes, which began on January 6, 2021, was interrupted by the January 6 United States Capitol attack, and finished the following day.[60]

Nominations

Democratic Party

The Democratic Party chose its nominee in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Joe Biden became the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party on June 5, 2020, when he secured enough delegates to ensure his nomination at the national convention.[61] Biden picked Kamala Harris as his vice-presidential nominee, and the ticket was formally nominated at the convention on August 18.[62]

Democratic Party (United States)
Democratic Party (United States)
2020 Democratic Party ticket
Joe BidenKamala Harris
for Presidentfor Vice President
47th
Vice President of the United States
(2009–2017)
U.S. Senator
from California
(2017–2021)
Campaign

Republican Party

Incumbent president Donald Trump and incumbent vice president Mike Pence were able to easily secure the nomination after Trump received enough delegates in the 2020 Republican presidential primaries. They were formally nominated at the Republican National Convention on August 24, 2020.[63][64]

Republican Party (United States)
Republican Party (United States)
2020 Republican Party ticket
Donald TrumpMike Pence
for Presidentfor Vice President
45th
President of the United States
(2017–2021)
48th
Vice President of the United States
(2017–2021)
Campaign

Libertarian Party

Jo Jorgensen, who was the running mate of author Harry Browne in 1996, received the Libertarian nomination at the national convention on May 23, 2020.[65] She achieved ballot access in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.[66]

2020 Libertarian Party ticket
Jo JorgensenSpike Cohen
for Presidentfor Vice President
Senior Lecturer at Clemson UniversityPodcaster and businessman

Green Party

Howie Hawkins became the presumptive nominee of the Green Party on June 21, 2020, and was officially nominated by the party on July 11, 2020.[67][68] Hawkins secured ballot access in 29 states and the District of Columbia, representing 381 electoral votes, and write-in access in 16 more states, representing 130 electoral votes.[69][70][e]

2020 Green Party ticket
Howie HawkinsAngela Walker
for Presidentfor Vice President
Co-founder of the Green PartyATU Local 998 Legislative Director
(2011–2013)

General election campaigns

Ballot access

Presidential
candidate[f]
Vice presidential
candidate[g]
Party or label[h]Ballot access (including write-in)
States/DCElectorsVoters[4]
Joe BidenKamala HarrisDemocratic51538100%
Donald TrumpMike PenceRepublican51538100%
Jo JorgensenSpike CohenLibertarian51538100%
Howie HawkinsAngela WalkerGreen30 (46)381 (511)73.2% (95.8%)
Gloria La RivaSunil FreemanSocialism and Liberation15 (33)195 (401)37.0% (76.1%)
Rocky De La FuenteDarcy RichardsonReform15 (25)183 (289)34.7% (54.1%)
Don BlankenshipWilliam MohrConstitution18 (30)166 (305)31.2% (56.8%)
Brock PierceKarla BallardIndependent16 (31)115 (285)19.1% (50.1%)
Brian CarrollAmar PatelAmerican Solidarity8 (39)66 (463)11.4% (87.7%)
Jade SimmonsClaudeliah J. RozeBecoming One Nation2 (38)15 (372)2.7% (68.9%)

Party conventions

Map of the United States showing Milwaukee, Charlotte, Austin, and Detroit
Milwaukee
Milwaukee
Charlotte
Charlotte
Virtual
Virtual
Virtual
Virtual
  Democratic Party
  Republican Party
  Libertarian Party (virtual)
  Green Party (virtual)

The 2020 Democratic National Convention was originally scheduled for July 13–16 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin,[72][73][74] but was delayed to August 17–20 due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.[75] On June 24, 2020, it was announced that the convention would be held in a mixed online in-person format, with most delegates attending remotely but a few still attending the physical convention site.[76] On August 5, the in-person portion of the convention was scaled down even further; major speeches, including Biden's, were switched to a virtual format.[77]

The 2020 Republican National Convention took place from August 24–27 in Charlotte, North Carolina, and various remote locations. Originally, a three-day convention was planned to be held in North Carolina, but due to North Carolina's insistence that the convention follow COVID-19 social distancing rules, the speeches and celebrations were moved to Jacksonville, Florida (official convention business was still contractually obligated to be conducted in Charlotte).[78][79] Due to the worsening situation with regards to COVID-19 in Florida, the plans there were cancelled, and the convention was moved back to Charlotte in a scaled-down capacity.[80]

The 2020 Libertarian National Convention was originally scheduled to be held in Austin, Texas, over Memorial Day weekend from May 22 to 25,[81][82] but all reservations at the JW Marriott Downtown Austin for the convention were cancelled on April 26 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[83] The Libertarian National Committee eventually decided the party would hold two conventions, one online from May 22–24 to select the presidential and vice-presidential nominees and one at a physical convention in Orlando, Florida, from July 8–12 for other business.[84]

The 2020 Green National Convention was originally to be held in Detroit, Michigan, from July 9 to 12.[74] Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the convention was instead held online, without a change in date.[85]

Issues unique to the election

Impeachment

The House of Representatives voted to impeach Trump on two counts on December 18, 2019.[86] The trial in the Senate began on January 21, 2020,[87] and ended on February 5, resulting in acquittal by the United States Senate.[88]

This is the second time a president has been impeached during his first term while running for a second term.[89][i] Trump continued to hold campaign rallies during the impeachment.[91][92] This is also the first time since the modern presidential primaries were established in 1911 that a president has been subjected to impeachment while the primary season was underway.[93] The impeachment process overlapped with the primary campaigns, forcing senators running for the Democratic nomination to remain in Washington for the trial in the days before and after the Iowa caucuses.[94][95]

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic

States and territories with at least one local, state, or federal primary election date or method of voting altered as of August 5, 2020.

Several events related to the 2020 presidential election were altered or postponed due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the United States and its effects, such as stay-at-home orders and social distancing guidelines by local governments. On March 10, following primary elections in six states, Democratic candidates Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders cancelled planned campaign night events and further in-person campaigning and campaign rallies.[96][97] On March 12, Trump also stated his intent to postpone further campaign rallies.[98] The 11th Democratic debate was held on March 15 without an audience at the CNN studios in Washington, D.C.[99] Several states also postponed their primaries to a later date, including Georgia,[100] Kentucky,[101] Louisiana,[102] Ohio,[103] and Maryland.[104] As of March 24, 2020, all major-party presidential candidates had halted in-person campaigning and campaign rallies over COVID-19 concerns. Political analysts speculated at the time that the moratorium on traditional campaigning, coupled with the effects of the pandemic on the nation, could have unpredictable effects on the voting populace and possibly, how the election will be conducted.[105][106][107]

A poll worker sanitizes an election booth in Davis, California

Some presidential primary elections were severely disrupted by COVID-19-related issues, including long lines at polling places, greatly increased requests for absentee ballots, and technology issues.[108] Due to a shortage of election workers able or willing to work during the pandemic, the number of polling places was often greatly reduced. Most states expanded or encouraged voting by mail as an alternative, but many voters complained that they never received the absentee ballots they had requested.[109]

The March 2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act included money for states to increase mail-in voting. By May, Trump and his campaign strongly opposed mail-in voting, claiming that it would cause widespread voter fraud, a belief that has been discredited by a number of media organizations.[110][111] Government response to the impact of the pandemic from the Trump administration, coupled with the differing positions taken by congressional Democrats and Republicans regarding economic stimulus, became a major campaign issue for both parties.[112][113]

On April 6, the Supreme Court and Republicans in the State Legislature of Wisconsin rebuffed Wisconsin governor Tony Evers's request to move the state's spring elections to June. As a result, the elections, which included a presidential primary, went ahead on April 7 as planned.[114] At least seven new cases of COVID-19 were traced to this election. Voting-rights advocates expressed fear of similar chaos on a nationwide scale in November, recommending states move to expand vote-by-mail options.[115]

On June 20, 2020, Trump's campaign held an in-person rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, after the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that the event could go ahead despite continuing concerns over COVID-19.[116] Attendance at the rally was far lower than expected, being described as a "flop", and it led to a significant worsening of relations between Trump and his campaign manager, Brad Parscale.[117] 7.7 million people watched the event on Fox News, a Saturday audience record for that channel.[118] Three weeks after the rally, the Oklahoma State Department of Health recorded record numbers of cases of COVID-19,[119] and former Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain died of the virus, although it was not confirmed that he caught the disease due to his attendance at the rally.[120]

On October 2, 2020, Trump and First Lady Melania Trump tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 following a positive test from his senior advisor, Hope Hicks, as part of the larger COVID-19 outbreak among White House personnel. Both the president and first lady immediately entered quarantine, which prevented Trump from further campaigning, notably at campaign rallies.[121][122][123] Later that day, the President was admitted to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center with a low grade fever, where he was reported to have received an experimental antibody treatment.[124][125] Trump's diagnosis came only two days after he had shared the stage with Biden at the first presidential debate and raised the possibility that Biden had caught the virus from Trump; Biden tested negative.[126][127] Trump was discharged from the hospital on October 5.[128]

Trump being diagnosed with COVID-19 was widely seen as having a negative effect on his campaign and shifted the attention of the public back onto COVID-19, an issue which is generally seen as a liability for Trump, due to his response to the COVID-19 pandemic suffering from low approval ratings.[129][130] Being in quarantine also meant Trump was unable to attend rallies, which were a major part of his campaign. As a result of Trump contracting COVID-19, Biden continued campaigning but temporarily ceased running attack ads against him.[131][132] On October 12, one week after his discharge from the hospital, Trump resumed in-person rallies.[128] Trump continued to travel to battleground states and hold mass rallies, sometimes two or three in a day. His rallies were criticized for their lack of social distancing or mask wearing, and some polls suggested that voters saw him less favorably for potentially endangering attendees.[133][134]

Foreign interference

U.S. officials accused Russia, China, and Iran of trying to influence the 2020 United States elections.[135][136] On October 4, 2019, Microsoft announced that "Phosphorus", a group of hackers linked to the Iranian government, had attempted to compromise e-mail accounts belonging to journalists, U.S. government officials and the campaign of a U.S. presidential candidate.[137][138] The American Government owned Voice of America reported in April 2020 that "Internet security researchers say there have already been signs that China-allied hackers have engaged in so-called 'spear-phishing' attacks on American political targets ahead of the 2020 vote." Chinese spokesman Geng Shuang denied the allegations and said he would "hope the people of the U.S. not drag China into its electoral politics".[139]

On February 13, 2020, American intelligence officials advised members of the House Intelligence Committee that Russia was interfering in the 2020 election in an effort to get Trump re-elected.[140][141] The briefing was delivered by Shelby Pierson, the intelligence community's top election security official and an aide to acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire. On February 21, The Washington Post reported that, according to unnamed U.S. officials, Russia was interfering in the Democratic primary in an effort to support the nomination of Senator Bernie Sanders. Sanders issued a statement after the news report, saying in part, "I don't care, frankly, who Putin wants to be president. My message to Putin is clear: stay out of American elections, and as president, I will make sure that you do."[142] Sanders acknowledged that his campaign was briefed about Russia's alleged efforts about a month prior.[143] In a February 2020 briefing to the House Intelligence Committee, U.S. intelligence officials warned Congress that Russia was interfering in the 2020 campaign to support Trump's reelection campaign; Trump was angered that Congress had been informed of the threat, and the day after the briefing castigated the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, for allowing the briefing to go forward.[144][145] China and some government-linked Chinese individuals have been accused of interfering in the election to support the candidacy of both Biden and Trump,[146] though whether it is actually doing so is disputed among the intelligence community.[145][147]

On October 21, threatening emails were sent to Democrats in at least four states. The emails warned, "You will vote for Trump on Election Day or we will come after you."[148] Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe announced that evening that the emails, using a spoofed return address, had been sent by Iran. He added that both Iran and Russia are known to have obtained American voter registration data, possibly from publicly available information, and "This data can be used by foreign actors to attempt to communicate false information to registered voters that they hope will cause confusion, sow chaos and undermine your confidence in American democracy." A spokesman for Iran denied the allegation.[149] In his announcement, Ratcliffe said Iran's intent had been "to intimidate voters, incite social unrest, and damage President Trump", raising questions as to how ordering Democrats to vote for Trump would be damaging to Trump. It was later reported that the reference to Trump had not been in Ratcliffe's prepared remarks as signed off by the other officials on the stage; he had added it on his own.[150] On November 18, 2021, the Justice Department charged two Iranian hackers with attempting to intimidate American voters ahead of the 2020 U.S. election by sending threatening emails and spreading false information.[151]

Throughout the election period, several Colombian lawmakers and the Colombian ambassador to the United States issued statements supporting the Donald Trump campaign, which has been viewed as potentially harmful to Colombia–United States relations.[152][153] On October 26, the U.S. Ambassador to Colombia, Philip Goldberg, requested that Colombian politicians abstain from getting involved in the elections.[154]

The Department of Justice is investigating whether the Trump Victory Committee accepted a $100,000 donation from Malaysian businessman and international fugitive Jho Low, who is accused of being the mastermind behind the multibillion-dollar 1Malaysia Development Berhad scandal involving a Malaysian sovereign wealth fund, 1MDB.[155][156]

Government officials and American corporate security officers braced for a repeat of 2016's election infrastructure hacking and similar twenty-first century attacks, and in fact conducted what were characterized as preemptive counter-strikes on botnet infrastructure which might be used in large-scale coordination of hacking,[157] and some incidents earlier in the year appeared to foreshadow such possibilities. Nonetheless, after his dismissal, in a December 2020 interview, Chris Krebs, the Trump administration's director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), described monitoring Election Day from CISA's joint command center along with representatives from the military's United States Cyber Command, the National Security Agency (NSA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the United States Secret Service (USSS), the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), representatives of vendors of voting machine equipment, and representatives of state and local governments, as well as his agency's analysis preceding and after that day, saying, "It was quiet. There was no indication or evidence that there was any sort of hacking or compromise of election systems on, before, or after November third."[158] Responding to spurious claims of foreign outsourcing of vote counting as a rationale behind litigation attempting to stop official vote-counting in some areas, Krebs also affirmed that, "All votes in the United States of America are counted in the United States of America."[158]

Acts of foreign interference included Russian state-directed application of computational propaganda approaches, more conventional state-sponsored Internet propaganda, smaller-scale disinformation efforts, "information laundering" and "trading up the chain" propaganda tactics employing some government officials, Trump affiliates, and US media outlets.[159]

Trump's potential rejection of election results

During the campaign, Trump indicated in Twitter posts, interviews, and speeches that he might refuse to recognize the outcome of the election if he were defeated; Trump falsely suggested that the election would be rigged against him.[160][161][162] In July 2020, Trump declined to answer whether he would accept the results, just as he did in the 2016 presidential election, telling Fox News anchor Chris Wallace that "I have to see. No, I'm not going to just say yes. I'm not going to say no."[163][164][165][166] Trump repeatedly claimed that "the only way" he could lose would be if the election was "rigged" and repeatedly refused to commit to a peaceful transition of power after the election.[167][168] Trump also attacked mail-in voting throughout the campaign, falsely claiming that the practice contains high rates of fraud;[169][170][171] at one point, Trump said, "We'll see what happens ... Get rid of the ballots and you'll have a very peaceful – there won't be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation."[172] Trump's statements have been described as a threat "to upend the constitutional order".[173] In September 2020, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, who was appointed by Trump, testified under oath that the FBI has "not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it's by mail or otherwise".[174]

A number of congressional Republicans insisted they were committed to an orderly and peaceful transition of power, but declined to criticize Trump for his comments.[175] On September 24, the Senate unanimously passed a resolution affirming the Senate's commitment to a peaceful transfer of power.[176] Trump also stated he expected the Supreme Court to decide the election and that he wanted a conservative majority in case of an election dispute, reiterating his commitment to quickly install a ninth justice following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.[177]

Election delay suggestion

In April 2020, Biden predicted that Trump would try to delay the election, saying he "is gonna try to kick back the election somehow, come up with some rationale why it can't be held".[178][179] In May, Jared Kushner did not rule out delaying the election, saying "I’m not sure I can commit one way or the other".[180] On July 30, Trump tweeted that "With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history" and proposed that the election should be delayed. Asked whether Trump had the relevant authority, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said "the United States Department of Justice will make that determination."[181] However, only Congress has the power to schedule elections,[182][183] and the Constitution sets the end of the presidential and vice-presidential terms at January 20, a hard deadline which can only be altered by constitutional amendment.[184][185] Congress refused to consider Trump's proposal,[186][187] and the election went ahead as scheduled.

Postal voting

Chart of July 2020 opinion survey on likelihood of voting by mail in November election, compared to 2016[188]

Postal voting in the United States has become increasingly common, with 25% of voters mailing their ballots in 2016 and 2018. By June 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic was predicted to cause a large increase in mail voting because of the possible danger of congregating at polling places.[189] An August 2020 state-by-state analysis concluded that 76% of Americans were eligible to vote by mail in 2020, a record number. The analysis predicted that 80 million ballots could be cast by mail in 2020 – more than double the number in 2016.[190]

The Postal Service sent a letter to multiple states in July 2020, warning that the service would not be able to meet the state's deadlines for requesting and casting last-minute absentee ballots.[191] In addition to the anticipated high volume of mailed ballots, the prediction was due in part to numerous measures taken by Louis DeJoy, the newly installed United States Postmaster General, including banning overtime and extra trips to deliver mail,[192] which caused delays in delivering mail,[193] and dismantling and removing hundreds of high-speed mail sorting machines from postal centers.[194] On August 18, after the House of Representatives had been recalled from its August break to vote on a bill reversing the changes, DeJoy announced that he would roll back all the changes until after the November election. He said he would reinstate overtime hours, roll back service reductions, and halt the removal of mail-sorting machines and collection boxes.[195]

The House of Representatives voted an emergency grant of $25 billion to the post office to facilitate the predicted flood of mail ballots.[196] Although Trump has repeatedly denounced mail voting, he has mailed in ballots due to being in a different state than the one where he votes at the time of the election.[197] In August 2020, Trump conceded that the post office would need additional funds to handle the additional mail-in voting, but said he would block any additional funding for the post office to prevent any increase in balloting by mail.[198]

In the end, an estimated 42 percent of votes were cast by mail across 41 reporting states,[199] approximately 65.6 million ballots out of 154.6 million cast by all methods.[200]

The Trump campaign filed lawsuits seeking to block the use of official ballot dropboxes in Pennsylvania in locations other than an election office, and also sought to "block election officials from counting mail-in ballots if a voter forgets to put their mail-in ballot in a secrecy sleeve within the ballot return-envelope".[201] The Trump campaign and the Republican Party both failed to produce any evidence of vote-by-mail fraud after being ordered by a federal judge to do so.[201]

On Election Day, a judge ordered mail inspectors to search "mail facilities in .... key battleground states" for ballots.[202] The agency refused to comply with the order and nearly 7% of ballots in USPS facilities on Election Day were not processed in time.[203]

Federal Election Commission issues

The Federal Election Commission, which was created in 1974 to enforce campaign finance laws in federal elections, has not functioned since July 2020 due to vacancies in membership. In the absence of a quorum, the commission cannot vote on complaints or give guidance through advisory opinions.[204] As of May 19, 2020, there were 350 outstanding matters on the agency's enforcement docket and 227 items waiting for action.[205] As of September 1, 2020, Trump had not nominated anyone to fill the FEC vacancies.[206]

Supreme Court vacancy

President Donald Trump with Amy Coney Barrett and her family, just prior to Barrett being announced as the nominee, September 26, 2020

On September 18, 2020, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell immediately said the precedent he had set regarding the Merrick Garland nomination was inoperative and that a replacement would be voted on as soon as possible, setting the stage for a confirmation battle and an unexpected intrusion into the campaign.[207] The death of Justice Ginsburg resulted in large increases in momentum for both the Democrats and Republicans.[208][209] The president,[210] vice president,[211] and several Republican members of Congress said a full Supreme Court bench was needed to decide the upcoming election.[212][213]

On September 26, the day after Justice Ginsburg's body lay in state at the Capitol, Trump held a Rose Garden ceremony at the White House to announce and introduce his candidate, Amy Coney Barrett.[214] After four days of confirmation hearings, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted the nomination out of committee on October 22,[215] and on October 26, Barrett was confirmed on a party-line vote of 52–48, with no Democrats voting for her confirmation.[216] This was the closest Supreme Court confirmation ever to a presidential election, and the first Supreme Court nomination since 1869 with no supporting votes from the minority party.[216] It was also one of the fastest timelines from nomination to confirmations in U.S. history.[217][218]

Pre-election litigation

By September 2020, several hundred legal cases relating to the election had been filed.[219] About 250 of these had to do with the mechanics of voting in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.[219] The Supreme Court ruled on a number of these cases,[220] primarily issuing emergency stays instead of going through the normal process due to the urgency.[221] In October 2020, there was speculation that the election might be decided through a Supreme Court case, as happened following the 2000 election.[222][223]

Debates

Sites of the 2020 general election presidential () and vice presidential () debates

On October 11, 2019, the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) announced that three general election debates would be held in the fall of 2020.[224]

The first, moderated by Chris Wallace, took place on September 29, and was co-hosted by Case Western Reserve University and the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio.[225] The debate was originally to be hosted at the University of Notre Dame in Notre Dame, Indiana, but the university decided against holding the debate as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.[225][226] Biden was generally held to have won the first debate,[227][228][229] with a significant minority of commentators deeming it a draw.[230][231]

One exchange that was particularly noted was when Trump did not directly denounce the white supremacist and neo-fascist group Proud Boys, instead responding that they should "stand back and stand by".[232][233][234] On the next day, Trump told reporters the group should "stand down" while also claiming that he was not aware of what the group was.[235][236] The debate was described as "chaotic and nearly incoherent" because of Trump's repeated interruptions, causing the CPD to consider adjustments to the format of the remaining debates.[237]

The vice presidential debate was held on October 7, 2020, at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.[238] The debate was widely held to be subdued, with no clear victor.[239][240] One incident that was particularly commented on was when a fly landed on vice-president Pence's head, and remained there unbeknownst to him for two minutes.[241][242]

The second debate was initially set to be held at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, but the university withdrew in June 2020, over concerns regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.[243] The planned debate was rescheduled for October 15 at the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts in Miami; due to Trump contracting COVID-19, the CPD announced on October 8 that the debate would be held virtually, in which the candidates would appear from separate locations. Trump refused to participate in a virtual debate, and the commission subsequently announced that the debate had been cancelled.[244][245]

The third scheduled debate took place on October 22 at Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee, and was moderated by Kristen Welker.[246][247] The changes to the debate rules, which included the candidates' microphones being muted while the other was speaking,[248] resulted in it being generally considered more civil than the first debate.[249] Welker's performance as moderator was praised, with her being regarded as having done a good job preventing the candidates from interrupting each other.[250] Biden was generally held to have won the debate, though it was considered unlikely to alter the race to any considerable degree.[251][252][253]

Debates for the 2020 U.S. presidential election sponsored by the CPD
No.DateTimeHostCityModerator(s)ParticipantsViewership
(millions)
P1September 29, 20209:00 p.m. EDTCase Western Reserve UniversityCleveland, OhioChris WallaceDonald Trump
Joe Biden
73.1[254]
VPOctober 7, 20207:00 p.m. MDTUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City, UtahSusan PageMike Pence
Kamala Harris
57.9[255]
(P2)[j]October 15, 20209:00 p.m. EDTArsht Center (planned)Miami, FloridaSteve Scully (planned)Donald Trump
Joe Biden
N/A
P2October 22, 20208:00 p.m. CDTBelmont UniversityNashville, TennesseeKristen WelkerDonald Trump
Joe Biden
63[257]

The Free & Equal Elections Foundation held two debates with various third party and independent candidates, one on October 8, 2020, in Denver, Colorado,[258] and another on October 24, 2020, in Cheyenne, Wyoming.[259]

Polling

Two-way

The following graph depicts the standing of each candidate in the poll aggregators from September 2019 to November 2020. Former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee, had an average polling lead of 7.9 percentage points over incumbent President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee. Biden would win the national popular vote by 4.4 percentage points.

Polling aggregates
Active candidates
  Joe Biden (Democratic)
  Donald Trump (Republican)
  Others/Undecided
Donald Trump vs. Joe Biden
Source of poll aggregationDates administeredDates updatedJoe BidenDonald TrumpOther/Undecided[k]Margin
270 to Win[260]Oct 28 – Nov 2, 2020Nov 2, 202051.1%43.1%5.8%Biden +8.0
RealClear Politics[261]Oct 25 – Nov 2, 202051.2%44.0%4.8%Biden +7.2
FiveThirtyEight[262]until Nov 2, 202051.8%43.4%Biden +8.4
Average51.4%43.5%5.1%Biden +7.9
2020 results51.3%46.8%1.9%Biden +4.5

Four-way

Calculated averages are not comparable to those for the Biden vs. Trump polls. As polling with third parties has been very limited, the polls included in the average are often different.

Donald Trump vs. Joe Biden vs. Jo Jorgensen vs. Howie Hawkins
Source of poll
aggregation
Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Joe
Biden
Donald
Trump
Jo
Jorgensen
Howie
Hawkins
Other/
Undecided[k]
Margin
270 to Win[263]Oct 23 – Nov 2, 2020Nov 2, 202050.6%43.2%1.2%1.0%4.0%Biden +7.4
RealClear Politics[264]Oct 15 – Nov 2, 2020Nov 2, 202050.6%43.2%1.8%0.8%3.6%Biden +7.4
2020 results51.3%46.8%1.1%0.2%0.6%Biden +4.5

Swing states

The following graph depicts the difference between Joe Biden and Donald Trump in each swing state in the poll aggregators from March 2020 to the election, with the election results for comparison.

Predictions

PublisherDatePrediction
2016 resultNov 8, 2016D: 232, R: 306
2020 resultNov 3, 2020D: 306, R: 232
Cook Political ReportOct 28, 2020[265]D: 290, R: 125, Tossup: 123
Inside ElectionsOct 28, 2020[266]D: 350, R: 125, Tossup: 63
Sabato's Crystal BallNov 2, 2020[267]D: 321, R: 217, Tossup: 0
PoliticoNov 2, 2020[268]D: 279, R: 163, Tossup: 96
RealClearPoliticsOct 29, 2020[269]D: 216, R: 125, Tossup: 197
CNNNov 2, 2020[270]D: 279, R: 163, Tossup: 96
The EconomistNov 3, 2020[271]D: 334, R: 164, Tossup: 40
CBS NewsNov 1, 2020[272]D: 279, R: 163, Tossup: 96
270toWinNov 3, 2020[273]D: 279, R: 163, Tossup: 96
ABC NewsNov 2, 2020[274]D: 321, R: 125, Tossup: 92
NPROct 30, 2020[275]D: 279, R: 125, Tossup: 134
NBC NewsOct 27, 2020[276]D: 279, R: 125, Tossup: 134
Decision Desk HQNov 3, 2020[277]D: 308, R: 163, Tossup: 67
FiveThirtyEightNov 2, 2020[278]D: 334, R: 169, Tossup: 35[l]

Endorsements

Total cost estimate

OpenSecrets estimated the total cost of the 2020 election nearly $14 billion, making it the most expensive election in history and twice as expensive as the previous presidential election cycle.[279]

Campaign issues

COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic was a major issue of the campaign, with Trump's responses being heavily criticized. The president spread mixed messages on the value of wearing face masks as protection, including criticizing Biden and reporters for wearing them, but has also encouraged their use at times.[280] During the campaign, Trump held many events across the country, including in COVID-19 hotspots, where attendees did not wear masks and were not socially distancing; at the same time, he mocked those who wore face masks.[281][282][283]

Biden advocated for the expansion of federal funding, including funding under the Defense Production Act for testing, personal protective equipment, and research.[284] Trump also invoked the Defense Production Act to control the distribution of masks and ventilators,[285] but his response plan relied significantly on a vaccine being released by the end of 2020.[284] At the second presidential debate, Trump claimed Biden had called him xenophobic for restricting entry from foreign nationals who had visited China, but Biden responded that he had not been referring to this decision.[286]

Economy

Proposed tax plan payment rates by income group as a percentage of income, including mandatory health insurance

Trump claimed credit for the consistent economic expansion of his presidency's first three years, with the stock market at its longest growth period in history and unemployment at a fifty-year low. Additionally, he has touted the 2020 third-quarter rebound, in which GDP grew at an annualized rate of 33.1%, as evidence of the success of his economic policies.[287] Biden responded to Trump's claims by repeating that the strong economy under Trump's presidency was inherited from the Obama administration, and that Trump has aggravated the economic impact of the pandemic, including the need for 42 million Americans to file for unemployment.[288]

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which lowered income taxes for many Americans and lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, were a major component of Trump's economic policy. Biden and the Democrats generally describe these cuts as unfairly benefiting the upper class. Biden plans to raise taxes on corporations and those making over $400,000 per year, while keeping the reduced taxes on lower-income brackets and raise capital gains taxes to a maximum bracket of 39.6%. In response, Trump said Biden's plans would destroy retirement accounts and the stock market.[289]

Environment

Trump and Biden's views on environmental policy differ significantly. Trump stated that climate change is a hoax, although he also called it a serious subject.[290] Trump condemned the Paris Agreement on greenhouse gas reduction and began the withdrawal process. Biden planned to rejoin it and announced a $2 trillion plan to combat climate change. Biden had not fully accepted the Green New Deal. Biden did not plan to ban fracking but rather to outlaw new fracking on federal land. In a debate, Trump claimed Biden wanted to ban it altogether. Trump's other environmental policies included the removal of methane emission standards, and an expansion of mining.[291]

Health care

Health care was a divisive issue in both the Democratic primary campaign and the general campaign. While Biden, as well as other candidates, promised protection of the Affordable Care Act, progressives within the Democratic Party advocated to replace the private insurance industry with Medicare for All. Biden's plan involves adding a public option to the American healthcare system,[292] and the restoration of the individual mandate to buy health care, which was removed from the Affordable Care Act by the 2017 tax cut bill,[293] as well as restoring funding for Planned Parenthood. Trump announced plans to repeal the Affordable Care Act, calling it "too expensive", but he did not say what would replace it.[294] At the time of the election, the Trump administration and Republican officials from 18 states had a lawsuit before the Supreme Court, asking the court to repeal the Affordable Care Act.[295]

Racial unrest

George Floyd protests in Minneapolis on May 26

As a result of the murder of George Floyd and other incidents of police brutality against African Americans, combined with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, a series of protests and a wider period of racial unrest erupted in mid-2020. This was followed by the Black Lives Matter movement, which protested police brutality against black people, and became a central point of the 2020 presidential campaign.[296] Protests were mostly peaceful; fewer than 4% involved property damage or violence (with most of the latter directed at BLM protesters themselves).[297] According to a September 2020 estimate, arson, vandalism, and looting caused about $1–2 billion in insured damage between May 26 and June 8, making this initial phase of the George Floyd protests the civil disorder event with the highest recorded damage in United States history.[298][299]

In response, Trump and the Republicans suggested sending in the military to counter the protests, which was criticized, especially by Democrats, as heavy-handed and potentially illegal.[300] Trump referred to Black Lives Matter protesters confronting diners in a restaurant as "thugs",[301] and called a street painting of the slogan a "symbol of hate".[302] Particularly controversial was a photo-op Trump took in front of St. John's Church in Washington, D.C., before which military police had forcefully cleared peaceful protestors from the area.[293] Biden condemned Trump for his actions against protestors; he described George Floyd's words "I can't breathe" as a "wake-up call for our nation". He also promised he would create a police oversight commission in his first 100 days as president, and establish a uniform use of force standard, as well as other police reform measures.[303]

Timeline

Results

Early voting in Cleveland, Ohio

Statistics

More than 158 million votes were cast in the election.[304] More than 100 million of them were cast before Election Day by early voting or mail ballot, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.[305] The election saw the highest voter turnout as a percentage of eligible voters since 1900,[306] with each of the two main tickets receiving more than 74 million votes, surpassing Barack Obama's record of 69.5 million votes from 2008.[307] The Biden–Harris ticket received more than 81 million votes, the most votes ever in a U.S. presidential election.[10][11] It was also the ninth consecutive presidential election where the victorious major party nominee did not receive a popular vote majority by a double-digit margin over the losing major party nominee(s), continuing the longest sequence of such presidential elections in U.S. history, which began in 1988 and in 2016 eclipsed the previous longest sequence, that from 1876 through 1900.[308][note 1][309] In 2020, 58 percent of U.S. voters lived in landslide counties,[310] a decline from 61 percent in 2016.[311]

Trump became the 11th incumbent in the country's history, and the first since 1992, to lose a bid for a second term. Biden's 51.3% of the popular vote was the highest for a challenger to an incumbent president since 1932.[312][313][314][m] Biden is the sixth vice president to become president without succeeding to the office on the death or resignation of a previous president.[315] Additionally, Trump's loss marked the third time an elected president lost the popular vote twice, the first being John Quincy Adams in the 1820s and Benjamin Harrison in the 1880s and 1890s.[316] This was the first time since 1980, and the first for Republicans since 1892 that a party was voted out after a single four-year term. This was the second election in American history in which the incumbent president lost re-election despite winning a greater share of the popular vote than he did in the previous election, after 1828. It is also the third election in which the two candidates that received electoral votes carried the same number of states. This also happened in 1880 and 1848.

Biden won 25 states, the District of Columbia, and one congressional district in Nebraska, totaling 306 electoral votes. Trump won 25 states and one congressional district in Maine, totaling 232 electoral votes. This result was exactly the reverse of Trump's victory, 306 to 232, in 2016 (excluding faithless electors).[317] Biden became the first Democrat to win the presidential election in Georgia since 1992 and in Arizona since 1996,[19] and the first candidate to win nationally without Florida since 1992 and Ohio since 1960, casting doubt on Ohio's continued status as a bellwether state.[318] Biden carried five states won by Trump in 2016: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. He also became the first Democrat since 2008 to carry Nebraska's 2nd congressional district, winning one electoral vote from the state. Trump did not win any states won by Clinton in 2016. Biden's three gains in the Rust Belt—Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin—were widely characterized as a rebuilding of the blue wall, a term widely used in the press for the states consistently won by Democrats from 1992 to 2012, broken by Trump in 2016 when he narrowly flipped those three Rust Belt states.[319][320][321][322] Nevertheless, amidst Trump's national and electoral defeat, his scoring decisive victories in Ohio, Iowa, and Florida for the second time, after their having backed Obama twice, has led many commentators to conclude they have shifted from perennial swing states to reliable red states.[323][324]

In light of the attempts to contest the election results, an important question is how many votes would have had to change in particular states in order to produce a different Electoral College outcome. If Biden's three narrowest state victories—Wisconsin, Georgia, and Arizona, all of which he won by less than a percentage point—had gone to Trump, there would have been a tie of 269 electors for each candidate,[325][326] causing a contingent election to be decided by the House of Representatives, where Trump had the advantage. (Even though Democrats controlled the House, contingent elections are determined by state delegations in which each state receives just one vote, and since a slight majority of states in 2020 contained more Republican than Democratic representatives, Republicans would have had more votes in such an election.) This scenario would have required a popular-vote shift of 0.63% or less in each of these three states, a total of about 43,000 votes, 0.03% of votes cast nationally.[327] This situation paralleled 2016, when a shift of 0.77% or less in each of the three most closely contested states (Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania), or about 77,000 votes, would have resulted in the popular vote winner Hillary Clinton also winning in the Electoral College.

This was the first time since 1948 that Democrats won the popular vote in four elections in a row. Biden was the second former vice president (after Richard Nixon in 1968) to win the presidency, as well as the first vice president since George H. W. Bush in 1988 to be elected president.[328]

Almost all counties previously considered reliable indicators of eventual success in presidential elections voted for Trump instead of Biden, meaning that they did not continue their streaks as bellwether counties. This was attributed to increasing political polarization throughout the country and to the urban-rural divide.[329]

While Trump still dominated rural America as a whole, there were rural areas that he lost. Biden won 50.5% of the rural counties that each had mostly non-white voters, particularly in the South and the West.[330] Rural counties in the South won by Biden had greater economic distress than those won by Trump; in the Northeast, the opposite was true.[330] In the West, Biden did especially well in rural counties that had high shares of workers employed in leisure and hospitality.[330] Such counties likewise had large constituencies of immigration from other states.[330] Biden became the oldest president ever elected, besting Ronald Reagan's record in 1984, and the oldest non-incumbent ever, besting Trump in 2016, however, both records were broken by Trump in 2024. Of the 3,153 counties/districts/independent cities making returns, Trump won the most popular votes in 2,595 (82.30%) while Biden carried 558 (17.70%).

Election calls

Hexagonal cartogram of the number of electoral college votes. States with opposite outcomes from 2016 are hatched.

Major news organizations project a state for a candidate when there is high mathematical confidence that the outstanding vote would be unlikely to prevent the projected winner from ultimately winning the state. Election projections are made by decision teams of political scientists and data scientists.[18]

People celebrate in the streets near the White House after the major networks projected Biden the winner of the election on November 7.
Senator Chuck Schumer addresses a crowd celebrating in Times Square, New York City, shortly after the election was called for Biden.

In the early hours of November 4, the Associated Press called Florida for Donald Trump at 12:35 a.m. EST, putting him at 164 electoral votes. By 1:06 a.m. EST, they called Texas for Trump, putting him at 202 electoral votes, compared to Joe Biden's 224. Arizona and Maine were called for Biden at 2:51 a.m. and 3:06 a.m. EST, respectively. At 1:24 p.m. EST that afternoon, the Associated Press called Maine's 2nd Congressional District for Trump, giving him 203 electoral votes. Then, Biden won Wisconsin and Michigan, at 2:16 p.m. and 3:58 p.m. EST, respectively, bringing him to 264 electoral votes, just 6 short of the presidency. On the morning of November 7 at approximately 11:25 a.m. EST, roughly three and a half days after polls had closed, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, the Associated Press, CNN, and Fox News all called the election and Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes for Biden, based on projections of votes in Pennsylvania showing him leading outside of the recount threshold (0.5% in that state), placing him at 284 electoral votes.[331][332][333][334][335][336][337] That evening, Biden and Harris gave victory speeches in Wilmington, Delaware.[338]

OSCE election monitoring

On the invitation of the U.S. State Department, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe's (OSCE) Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), which has been monitoring U.S. elections since 2002 (as it does for major elections in all other OSCE member countries), sent 102 observers from 39 countries.[339][340][341] The task force consisted of long-term observers from the ODIHR office (led by former Polish diplomat Urszula Gacek) deployed to 28 states from September on and covering 15 states on election day, and a group of European lawmakers acting as short-term observers (led by German parliamentarian Michael Georg Link), reporting from Maryland, Virginia, California, Nevada, Michigan, Missouri, Wisconsin, and D.C.[339][341] Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was scaled down to a "limited election observation mission" from the originally planned 100 long-term observers and 400 short-term observers.[339]

An interim report published by the OSCE shortly before the election noted that many ODIHR interlocutors "expressed grave concerns about the risk of legitimacy of the elections being questioned due to the incumbent President's repeated allegations of a fraudulent election process, and postal vote in particular."[339][342] On the day after the election, the task force published preliminary findings,[340] with part of the summary stating:

The 3 November general elections were competitive and well managed despite legal uncertainties and logistical challenges. In a highly polarized political environment, harsh campaign rhetoric fuelled tensions. Measures intended to secure the elections during the pandemic triggered protracted litigation driven by partisan interests. The uncertainty caused by late legal challenges and evidence-deficient claims about election fraud created confusion and concern among election officials and voters. Voter registration and identification rules in some states are unduly restrictive for certain groups of citizens. The media, although sharply polarized, provided comprehensive coverage of the campaign and made efforts to provide accurate information on the organization of elections.[343]

Link said that "on the election day itself, we couldn't see any violations" at the polling places visited by the observers.[340] The task force also found "nothing untoward" while observing the handling of mail-in ballots at post offices, with Gacek being quoted as saying: "We feel that allegations of systemic wrongdoing in these elections have no solid ground. The system has held up well."[341] The OSCE's election monitoring branch published a more comprehensive report in early 2021.[341][344]

Electoral results

Candidates are listed individually below if they received more than 0.1% of the popular vote. Popular vote totals are from the Federal Election Commission report.[1]

Electoral results
Presidential candidatePartyHome statePopular voteElectoral
vote
Running mate
CountPercentageVice-presidential candidateHome stateElectoral vote
Joe BidenDemocraticDelaware81,283,50151.31%306 Kamala HarrisCalifornia306
Donald Trump
(incumbent)
RepublicanFlorida74,223,97546.85%232 Mike Pence
(incumbent)
Indiana232
Jo JorgensenLibertarianSouth Carolina1,865,5351.18%0 Spike CohenSouth Carolina0
Howie HawkinsGreenNew York407,0680.26%0 Angela Nicole WalkerSouth Carolina0
Rocky De La FuenteReformCalifornia301,0160.19%0 Darcy RichardsonFlorida0
Other348,5360.22%Other
Total158,429,631100%538538
Needed to win270270

Results by state

Legend
States won by Biden/Harris
States won by Trump/Pence
EVElectoral votes
At-large results (for Maine and Nebraska, which both split electoral votes)
Results by state[1][345][346]
State or
district
Biden/Harris
Democratic
Trump/Pence
Republican
Jorgensen/Cohen
Libertarian
Hawkins/Walker
Green
OthersMarginMargin
swing[n]
Total
votes
Votes%
EV
Votes%
EV
Votes%
EV
Votes%
EV
Votes%
EV
Votes%%
Alabama849,62436.57%1,441,17062.03%925,1761.08%[o][o]7,3120.31%−591,546−25.46%2.27%2,323,282
Alaska153,77842.77%189,95152.83%38,8972.47%[p][p]6,9041.92%−36,173−10.06%4.67%359,530
Arizona1,672,14349.36%111,661,68649.06%51,4651.52%1,5570.05%4750.01%10,4570.31%3.81%3,387,326
Arkansas423,93234.78%760,64762.40%613,1331.08%2,9800.24%18,3771.51%−336,715−27.62%−0.70%1,219,069
California11,110,63963.48%556,006,51834.32%187,9101.07%81,0320.46%115,2810.66%5,104,12129.16%−0.95%17,501,380
Colorado1,804,35255.40%91,364,60741.90%52,4601.61%8,9860.28%26,5750.82%439,74513.50%8.59%3,256,980
Connecticut1,080,83159.26%7714,71739.19%20,2301.11%7,5380.41%5410.03%366,11420.07%6.43%1,823,857
Delaware296,26858.74%3200,60339.77%5,0000.99%2,1390.42%3360.07%95,66518.97%7.60%504,346
District of Columbia317,32392.15%318,5865.40%2,0360.59%1,7260.50%4,6851.36%298,73786.75%−0.02%344,356
Florida5,297,04547.86%5,668,73151.22%2970,3240.64%14,7210.13%16,6350.15%−371,686−3.36%−2.16%11,067,456
Georgia2,473,63349.47%162,461,85449.24%62,2291.24%1,0130.02%1,2310.02%11,7790.24%5.37%4,999,960
Hawaii366,13063.73%4196,86434.27%5,5390.96%3,8220.67%2,1140.37%169,26629.46%−2.72%574,469
Idaho287,02133.07%554,11963.84%416,4041.89%4070.05%9,9831.15%−267,098−30.77%1.00%867,934
Illinois3,471,91557.54%202,446,89140.55%66,5441.10%30,4940.51%17,9000.30%1,025,02416.99%−0.08%6,033,744
Indiana1,242,49840.96%1,729,85757.03%1158,9011.94%9890.03%9650.03%−487,359−16.07%3.10%3,033,210
Iowa759,06144.89%897,67253.09%619,6371.16%3,0750.18%11,4260.68%−138,611−8.20%1.21%1,690,871
Kansas570,32341.51%771,40656.14%630,5742.23%6690.05%1,0140.07%−201,083−14.64%5.96%1,373,986
Kentucky772,47436.15%1,326,64662.09%826,2341.23%7160.03%10,6980.50%−554,172−25.94%3.90%2,136,768
Louisiana856,03439.85%1,255,77658.46%821,6451.01%14,6070.68%−399,742−18.61%1.03%2,148,062
Maine435,07253.09%2360,73744.02%14,1521.73%8,2301.00%1,2700.15%74,3359.07%6.11%819,461
ME-1Tooltip Maine's 1st congressional district266,37660.11%1164,04537.02%7,3431.66%4,6541.05%6940.16%102,33123.09%8.28%443,112
ME-2Tooltip Maine's 2nd congressional district168,69644.82%196,69252.26%16,8091.81%3,5760.95%5760.15%−27,996−7.44%2.85%376,349
Maryland1,985,02365.36%10976,41432.15%33,4881.10%15,7990.52%26,3060.87%1,008,60933.21%6.79%3,037,030
Massachusetts2,382,20265.60%111,167,20232.14%47,0131.29%18,6580.51%16,3270.45%1,215,00033.46%6.26%3,631,402
Michigan2,804,04050.62%162,649,85247.84%60,3811.09%13,7180.25%11,3110.20%154,1882.78%3.01%5,539,302
Minnesota1,717,07752.40%101,484,06545.28%34,9761.07%10,0330.31%31,0200.95%233,0127.11%5.59%3,277,171
Mississippi539,39841.06%756,76457.60%68,0260.61%1,4980.11%8,0730.61%−217,366−16.55%1.28%1,313,759
Missouri1,253,01441.41%1,718,73656.80%1041,2051.36%8,2830.27%4,7240.16%−465,722−15.39%3.25%3,025,962
Montana244,78640.55%343,60256.92%315,2522.53%340.01%−98,816−16.37%4.05%603,674
Nebraska374,58339.17%556,84658.22%220,2832.12%[o][o]4,6710.49%−182,263−19.06%5.99%956,383
NE-1Tooltip Nebraska's 1st congressional district132,26141.09%180,29056.01%17,4952.33%[o][o]1,8400.57%−48,029−14.92%5.80%321,886
NE-2Tooltip Nebraska's 2nd congressional district176,46851.95%1154,37745.45%6,9092.03%[o][o]1,9120.56%22,0916.50%8.74%339,666
NE-3Tooltip Nebraska's 3rd congressional district65,85422.34%222,17975.36%15,8791.99%[o][o]9190.31%−156,325−53.02%1.17%294,831
Nevada[q]703,48650.06%6669,89047.67%14,7831.05%17,2171.23%33,5962.39%−0.03%1,405,376
New Hampshire424,93752.71%4365,66045.36%13,2361.64%2170.03%2,1550.27%59,2777.35%6.98%806,205
New Jersey[r]2,608,40057.33%141,883,31341.40%31,6770.70%14,2020.31%11,8650.26%725,08715.94%1.84%4,549,457
New Mexico501,61454.29%5401,89443.50%12,5851.36%4,4260.48%3,4460.37%99,72010.79%2.58%923,965
New York5,244,88660.87%293,251,99737.74%60,3830.70%32,8320.38%26,7630.31%1,992,88923.13%0.64%8,616,861
North Carolina2,684,29248.59%2,758,77549.93%1548,6780.88%12,1950.22%20,8640.38%−74,483−1.35%2.31%5,524,804
North Dakota115,04231.78%235,75165.12%39,3712.59%[o][o]1,8600.51%−120,709−33.34%2.39%362,024
Ohio2,679,16545.24%3,154,83453.27%1867,5691.14%18,8120.32%1,8220.03%−475,669−8.03%0.10%5,922,202
Oklahoma503,89032.29%1,020,28065.37%724,7311.58%11,7980.76%−516,390−33.09%3.99%1,560,699
Oregon1,340,38356.45%7958,44840.37%41,5821.75%11,8310.50%22,0770.93%381,93516.09%5.10%2,374,321
Pennsylvania3,458,22949.85%203,377,67448.69%79,3801.14%1,2820.02%20,4110.29%80,5551.16%1.88%6,936,976
Rhode Island307,48659.39%4199,92238.61%5,0530.98%[o][o]5,2961.02%107,56420.77%5.26%517,757
South Carolina1,091,54143.43%1,385,10355.11%927,9161.11%6,9070.27%1,8620.07%−293,562−11.68%2.59%2,513,329
South Dakota150,47135.61%261,04361.77%311,0952.63%−110,572−26.16%3.63%422,609
Tennessee1,143,71137.45%1,852,47560.66%1129,8770.98%4,5450.15%23,2430.76%−708,764−23.21%2.80%3,053,851
Texas[s]5,259,12646.48%5,890,34752.06%38126,2431.12%33,3960.30%5,9440.05%−631,221−5.58%3.41%11,315,056
Utah560,28237.65%865,14058.13%638,4472.58%5,0530.34%19,3671.30%−304,858−20.48%−2.40%1,488,289
Vermont242,82066.09%3112,70430.67%3,6080.98%1,3100.36%6,9861.90%130,11635.41%9.00%367,428
Virginia2,413,56854.11%131,962,43044.00%64,7611.45%[o][o]19,7650.44%451,13810.11%4.79%4,460,524
Washington2,369,61257.97%121,584,65138.77%80,5001.97%18,2890.45%34,5790.85%784,96119.20%3.49%4,087,631
West Virginia235,98429.69%545,38268.62%510,6871.34%2,5990.33%790.01%−309,398−38.93%3.14%794,731
Wisconsin1,630,86649.45%101,610,18448.82%38,4911.17%1,0890.03%17,4110.53%20,6820.63%1.40%3,298,041
Wyoming73,49126.55%193,55969.94%35,7682.08%[o][o]3,9471.43%−120,068−43.38%2.92%276,765
Total81,283,50151.31%30674,223,97546.85%2321,865,5351.18%407,0680.26%649,5520.41%7,059,5264.46%2.36%158,429,631
Biden/Harris
Democratic
Trump/Pence
Republican
Jorgensen/Cohen
Libertarian
Hawkins/Walker
Green
OthersMarginMargin
swing
Total
votes

Two states, Maine and Nebraska, allow their electoral votes to be split between candidates by congressional districts. The winner of each congressional district gets one electoral vote for the district. The winner of the statewide vote gets two additional electoral votes.[350][351]

States and EV districts that flipped from Republican to Democratic

Close states

States where the margin of victory was under 1% (37 electoral votes; all won by Biden):

  1. Georgia, 0.23% (11,779 votes) – 16 electoral votes
  2. Arizona, 0.31% (10,457 votes) – 11 electoral votes
  3. Wisconsin, 0.63% (20,682 votes) – 10 electoral votes (tipping-point state for Biden victory)[325]

States where the margin of victory was between 1% and 5% (86 electoral votes; 42 won by Biden, 44 by Trump):

  1. Pennsylvania, 1.16% (80,555 votes) – 20 electoral votes (tipping-point state for Trump victory)[326]
  2. North Carolina, 1.35% (74,483 votes) – 15 electoral votes
  3. Nevada, 2.39% (33,596 votes) – 6 electoral votes
  4. Michigan, 2.78% (154,188 votes) – 16 electoral votes
  5. Florida, 3.36% (371,686 votes) – 29 electoral votes

States/districts where the margin of victory was between 5% and 10% (80 electoral votes; 17 won by Biden, 63 by Trump):

  1. Texas, 5.58% (631,221 votes) – 38 electoral votes
  2. Nebraska's 2nd congressional district, 6.50% (22,091 votes) – 1 electoral vote
  3. Minnesota, 7.11% (233,012 votes) – 10 electoral votes
  4. New Hampshire, 7.35% (59,267 votes) – 4 electoral votes
  5. Maine's 2nd congressional district, 7.44% (27,996 votes) – 1 electoral vote
  6. Ohio, 8.03% (475,669 votes) – 18 electoral votes
  7. Iowa, 8.20% (138,611 votes) – 6 electoral votes
  8. Maine, 9.07% (74,335 votes) – 2 electoral votes

Blue denotes states or congressional districts won by Democrat Joe Biden; red denotes those won by Republican Donald Trump.

County statistics

Counties with highest percentage of Democratic vote:[352]

  1. Kalawao County, Hawaii – 95.8%[353]
  2. Washington, D.C. – 92.15%
  3. Prince George's County, Maryland – 89.26%
  4. Oglala Lakota County, South Dakota – 88.41%
  5. Petersburg, Virginia – 87.75%

Counties with highest percentage of Republican vote:

  1. Roberts County, Texas – 96.18%
  2. Borden County, Texas – 95.43%
  3. King County, Texas – 94.97%
  4. Garfield County, Montana – 93.97%
  5. Glasscock County, Texas – 93.57%

Maps

Voter demographics

Voter demographic data for 2020 were collected by Edison Research for the National Election Pool, a consortium of ABC News, CBS News, MSNBC, CNN, Fox News, and the Associated Press. The voter survey is based on exit polls completed by 15,590 voters in person as well as by phone.[354]

2020 presidential election voter demographics (exit polling)[355]
Demographic subgroupBidenTrump% of
total vote
Total vote5147100
Ideology
Liberals891024
Moderates643438
Conservatives148538
Party
Democrats94637
Republicans69436
Independents544126
Gender
Men455348
Women574252
Marital status
Married455356
Unmarried584044
Gender by marital status
Married men435530
Married women485126
Unmarried men524520
Unmarried women623623
Race/ethnicity
White415867
Black871213
Latino653313
Asian63364
Other55414
Gender by race/ethnicity
White men386135
White women445532
Black men79194
Black women9098
Latino men59365
Latina women69308
Other58388
Religion
Protestant/Other Christian396043
Catholic524725
Jewish76222
Other religion68298
None653122
White evangelical or born-again Christian
Yes247628
No623672
Age
18–24 years old65319
25–29 years old54437
30–39 years old514616
40–49 years old544416
50–64 years old475230
65 and older475222
Age by race
White 18–29 years old44538
White 30–44 years old415714
White 45–59 years old386119
White 60 and older425726
Black 18–29 years old88103
Black 30–44 years old78194
Black 45–59 years old89103
Black 60 and older9273
Latino 18–29 years old69284
Latino 30–44 years old62354
Latino 45–59 years old68303
Latino 60 and older58402
Others59388
Sexual orientation
LGBT75237
Non-LGBT514893
First time voter
Yes643214
No494986
Education
High school or less465419
Some college education514723
Associate degree475016
Bachelor's degree514727
Postgraduate degree623715
Education by race
White college graduates514832
White no college degree326735
Non-white college graduates702710
Non-white no college degree722624
Education by race/gender
White women with college degrees544514
White women without college degrees366317
White men with college degrees485117
White men without college degrees287018
Non-White712633
Income
Under $30,000544615
$30,000–49,999564420
$50,000–99,999564239
$100,000–199,999415720
Over $200,00048487
Union households
Yes564120
No504980
Military service
Veterans445415
Non-veterans534585
Region
East584020
Midwest475123
South465335
West574122
Area type
Urban603829
Suburban504851
Rural425719
Trump job approval
Strongly approve49638
Somewhat approve207512
Somewhat disapprove89710
Strongly disapprove97139
Quality of candidate that mattered most
Has good judgment682624
Cares about people like me495021
Can unite the country752419
Is a strong leader287211
More important to presidential vote
Candidate's positions on issues475374
Candidate's personal qualities643123
Vote for president mainly
For your candidate465371
Against his opponent683024
Life for the next generation of Americans will be
Better than today554454
About the same405821
Worse than today524520
View of federal government
Angry742426
Dissatisfied673132
Satisfied297027
Enthusiastic188113
Decided on presidential vote
Before September514673
In September524511
In October48498
In the last week31642
In the last few days49473
Issue regarded as most important
Economy168235
Racial inequality92720
COVID-19 pandemic811617
Crime and safety277111
Health care623711
Condition of the nation's economy
Poor871019
Not so good762231
Good247536
Excellent168413
Family's financial situation today
Better than four years ago267241
About the same653439
Worse than four years ago772020
Racism in the U.S.
The most important problem871118
An important problem613751
A minor problem188118
Not a problem at all89110
View of Black Lives Matter
Favorable782057
Unfavorable148637
Does the country's criminal justice system
Treat Black people unfairly821753
Treat all people fairly148440
U.S. efforts to contain coronavirus are going
Very well138618
Somewhat well217833
Somewhat badly742415
Very badly94432
Better to handle the coronavirus pandemic
Biden92653
Trump49543
Has the coronavirus pandemic caused you
Severe financial hardship692916
Moderate financial hardship593939
No financial hardship at all386044
Which is more important to do now
Contain coronavirus791952
Rebuild the economy207842
Is wearing a face mask in public more of a
Public health responsibility643567
Personal choice247330
Importance of recent rise in coronavirus cases to presidential vote
The most important factor613823
An important factor475137
A minor factor138618
Not a factor at all79116
How confident that votes will be counted accurately
Very confident524747
Somewhat confident564240
Not very confident34618
Not at all confident31664
Voting in your state is
Very easy485069
Somewhat easy603925
Somewhat difficult52464
Very difficultN/AN/A2
In vote for president, Supreme Court appointments were
The most important factor475113
An important factor544547
A minor factor514818
Not a factor at all494919
On Obamacare, should the Supreme Court
Keep it as it is801851
Overturn it217844
Abortion should be
Legal in all cases801825
Legal in most cases683026
Illegal in most cases277225
Illegal in all cases188117
Climate change is a serious problem
Yes692967
No158430

The Brookings Institution released a report entitled "Exit polls show both familiar and new voting blocs sealed Biden's win" on November 12, 2020. In it, author William H. Frey attributes Obama's 2008 win to young people, people of color, and the college-educated. Frey contends Trump won in 2016 thanks to older White without college degrees.[356] Frey says the same coalitions largely held in 2008 and 2016, although in key battleground states Biden increased his vote among some of the 2016 Trump groups, particularly among White and older Americans.[356] Trump won the white vote in 2016 by 20% but in 2020 by only 16%. The Democratic Party won black voters by 75%, the lowest margin since 1980. Democrats won the Latino vote by 32%, which is the smallest margin since 2004, and they won the Asian American vote by 27%, the lowest figure since 2008.[356] Biden reduced the Republican margin of white men without college educations from 48% to 42%, and the Democrats made a slight improvement of 2% among white, college-educated women. People age 18 to 29 registered a rise in Democratic support between 2016 and 2020, with the Democratic margin of victory among that demographic increasing from 19% to 24%.[356]

Post-election analysis using verified voter data found the Associated Press's Votecast was more accurate than the exit polls.[357][358]

Voting patterns by ethnicity

Hispanic and Latino voters

Biden won 65% of the Latino vote according to Edison Research, and 63% according to the Associated Press. Voto Latino reported that the Latino vote was crucial to the Biden victory in Arizona. 40% of Latino voters who voted in 2020 did not vote in 2016, and 73% of those Latino voters voted for Biden (438,000 voters).[359] Florida and Texas, which have large Latino populations, were carried by Trump. In Florida, Trump won a majority of Cuban American voters in Miami-Dade County, Florida.[360] The Latino vote was still crucial to enable Biden to carry states such as Nevada.[361] Latino voters were targeted by a major Spanish-language disinformation campaign in the final weeks of the election, with various falsehoods and conspiracy theories being pushed out by WhatsApp and viral social media posts.[362][363][364]

Demographic patterns emerged having to do with country of origin and candidate preference. Pre- and post-election surveys showed Biden winning Latinos of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Dominican,[365] and Spanish heritage,[366] while Trump carried Latinos of Cuban heritage. Data from Florida showed Biden holding a narrow edge among South Americans.[367]

Black voters

Biden won 87% of the Black vote, while Trump won 12%.[368] Biden's advantage among Black voters was crucial in the large cities of Pennsylvania and Michigan; the increase in the Democratic vote in Milwaukee County of about 28,000 votes was more than the 20,000-vote lead Biden had in the state of Wisconsin. Almost half Biden's gains in Georgia came from the four largest counties – Fulton, DeKalb, Gwinnett, and Cobb – all in the Atlanta metro area with large Black populations.[369] Trump improved his overall share of the Black vote from 2016 by 4% and doubled the Black vote that Mitt Romney received in 2012.[370][371][368]

Asian American and Pacific Island voters

Polls showed that 68% of Asian American and Pacific Island (AAPI) voters supported Biden/Harris, while 28% supported Trump/Pence. Karthick Ramakrishnan, a political science professor at the University of California Riverside and founder of AAPI Data, said Asian Americans supported Biden over Trump by about a 2:1 margin. Korean Americans, Japanese Americans, Indian Americans, and Chinese Americans favored Biden by higher margins overall compared to Vietnamese Americans and Filipino Americans.[372] Many voters were turned off by Trump's language some of which was widely considered racist such as ("China virus" and "kung flu") but, according to Vox reporter Terry Nguyen, many Vietnamese voters (and especially elderly, South Vietnamese migrants who populated coastal centers in the 1970s) appreciated his strong anti-China stance.[373]

Indian American voters

Data from FiveThirtyEight indicated 65% of Indian American voters backed Joe Biden, and 28% supported Donald Trump.[372] Some Indian Americans self-identified with Kamala Harris, but others approved of Donald Trump's support of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.[374] In a speech given to 50,000 Indian-Americans during his 2019 visit to the US, Modi praised Trump with remarks that were interpreted as an indirect endorsement of his candidacy.[375] Indian right-wing organizations like the Hindu Sena had performed special havans and pujas for Trump's electoral victory.[376]

American Indian and Alaska Native voters

Pre-election voter surveys by Indian Country Today found 68% of American Indian and Alaska Native voters supporting Democratic nominee Joe Biden.[377] In particular, the Navajo Reservation, which spans a large quadrant of eastern Arizona and western New Mexico, delivered up to 97% of their votes per precinct to Biden,[378] while overall support for Biden was between 60 and 90% on the Reservation.[379] Biden also posted large turnout among Havasupai, Hopi, and Tohono O'odham peoples,[380] delivering a large win in New Mexico and flipping Arizona.

In Montana, while the state went for Trump overall, Biden won counties overlapping reservations of the Blackfeet, Fort Belknap, Crow and Northern Cheyenne.[381] The same pattern held in South Dakota, with most of the counties overlapping the lands of the Standing Rock Sioux, Cheyenne River Sioux, Oglala Sioux, Rosebud Sioux and Crow Creek tribes going for Biden. For example, in Oglala Lakota County, which overlaps with the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, Biden won 88% of the vote.[381]

Trump's strongest performance among Native tribes was with the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, where he won a strong majority in Robeson County and flipped Scotland County from Democratic to Republican.[382] Trump had campaigned in Lumberton, in Robeson County, and had promised the Lumbees federal recognition.[382]

Polling accuracy

Although polls generally predicted the Biden victory, the national polls overestimated him by three to four points, and some state polling was even further from the actual result and greater than 2016's error (one or two points).[383] The numbers represented the highest level of error since the 1980 presidential election.[384] This polling overestimation also applied in several Senate races, where the Democrats underperformed by about five points relative to the polls,[385] as well as the House elections, where Republicans gained seats instead of losing as polls predicted. Most pollsters underestimated support for Trump in several key battleground states, including Florida, Iowa, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Texas, and Wisconsin. The discrepancy between poll predictions and the actual result persisted from the 2016 election despite pollsters' attempts to fix problems with polling in 2016, in which they underestimated the Republican vote in several states. The imprecise polls led to changes in campaigning and fundraising decisions for both Democrats and Republicans.[383]

According to The New York Times, polling misses have been attributed to, among other issues, reduced average response to polling; the relative difficulty to poll certain types of voters; and pandemic-related problems, such as a theory which suggests Democrats were less willing to vote in person on Election Day than Republicans for fear of contracting COVID-19.[383] According to CNN, research presented to the American Association for Public Opinion Research indicated one of the primary problems was an inability by pollsters to include a certain segment of Trump supporters, either due to inaccessibility or lack of participation.[384] New Statesman data journalist Ben Walker pointed to Hispanics as a historically difficult group to poll accurately, leading to pollsters underestimating the level of Trump support within the demographic group.[386] Election analyst Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight argued that the polling error in 2020 was normal by historical standards.[387]

Siena College Research Institute reported that a significant source of polling error was the discounting of partial responses by "mistrustful Trump supporters" who "yelled" at their callers; when someone would "say 'I'm voting for Trump—fuck you,' and then hang up before completing the rest of the survey," it would not be counted as a response. Such "partials" made up "nearly half of Siena's error rate."[388]

Aftermath

Election night

Voters cast ballots at Roosevelt High School in Des Moines, Iowa

Election night, November 3, ended without a clear winner, as many state results were too close to call and millions of votes remained uncounted, including in the battleground states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada.[389] Results were delayed in these states due to local rules on counting mail-in ballots.[390] Mail-in ballots became particularly prevalent in the 2020 election due to the widespread outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Over roughly 67 million mail-in ballots were submitted, over doubling the previous election's 33.5 million.[391] In a victory declared after midnight, Trump won the swing state of Florida by over three percentage points, an increase from his 1.2 percentage point margin in 2016, having seen significant gains in support among the Latino community in Miami-Dade County.[392]

Shortly after 12:30 a.m. EST, Biden made a short speech in which he urged his supporters to be patient while the votes are counted, and said he believed he was "on track to win this election".[393][394] Shortly before 2:30 a.m. EST, Trump made a speech to a roomful of supporters, falsely asserting that he had won the election and calling for a stop to all vote counting, saying that continued counting was "a fraud on the American people" and "we will be going to the U.S. Supreme Court."[395][396] The Biden campaign denounced these attempts, claiming the Trump campaign was engaging in a "naked effort to take away the democratic rights of American citizens".[397]

Late counting

In Pennsylvania, where the counting of mail-in ballots began on election night, Trump declared victory on November 4 with a lead of 675,000 votes, despite more than a million ballots remaining uncounted. Trump also declared victory in North Carolina and Georgia, despite many ballots being uncounted.[398] At 11:20 p.m. EST on election night, Fox News projected Biden would win Arizona, with the Associated Press making the same call at 2:50 a.m. EST on November 4;[399][400] several other media outlets concluded the state was too close to call.[401][402] By the evening of November 4, the Associated Press reported that Biden had secured 264 electoral votes by winning Michigan and Wisconsin, with Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, and Nevada remaining uncalled.[403] Biden had a 1% lead in Nevada[404] and maintained a 2.3% lead in Arizona by November 5,[405] needing only to win Nevada and Arizona or to win Pennsylvania to obtain the necessary 270 electoral votes.[403]

Some Trump supporters expressed concerns of possible fraud after seeing the president leading in some states on Election Night, only to see Biden take the lead in subsequent days. Election experts[406] attributed this to several factors, including a "red mirage" of early results being counted in relatively thinly populated rural areas that favored Trump, which are quicker to count, followed later by results from more heavily populated urban areas that favored Biden, which take longer to count. In some states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, Republican-controlled legislatures prohibited mail-in ballots from being counted before Election Day, and once those ballots were counted they generally favored Biden, at least in part because Trump had for months raised concerns about mail-in ballots, encouraging his supporters instead to vote in person. By contrast, in states such as Florida, which allowed counting of mail-in ballots for weeks prior to Election Day, an early blue shift giving the appearance of a Biden lead was later overcome by in-person voting that favored Trump, resulting in the state being called for the president on Election Night.[407][408][409]

On November 5, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by the Trump campaign to stop vote-counting in Pennsylvania. The Trump campaign had alleged that its observers were not given access to observe the vote, but its lawyers admitted during the hearing that its observers were already present in the vote-counting room.[410] Also that day, a state judge dismissed another lawsuit by the Trump campaign which alleged that in Georgia, late-arriving ballots were counted. The judge ruled no evidence had been produced that the ballots were late.[411] Meanwhile, a state judge in Michigan dismissed the Trump campaign's lawsuit requesting a pause in vote-counting to allow access to observers, as the judge noted that vote-counting had already finished in Michigan.[412] That judge also noted the official complaint did not state "why", "when, where, or by whom" an election observer was allegedly blocked from observing ballot-counting in Michigan.[413]

On November 6, Biden assumed leads in Pennsylvania and Georgia as the states continued to count ballots, and absentee votes in those states heavily favored Biden.[414] Due to the slim margin between Biden and Trump in the state, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced on November 6 that a recount would be held in Georgia. At that point, Georgia had not seen "any widespread irregularities" in this election, according to the voting system manager of the state, Gabriel Sterling.[415]

Also, on November 6, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito issued an order requiring officials in Pennsylvania to segregate late-arriving ballots, amid a dispute as to whether the state's Supreme Court validly ordered a 3-day extension of the deadline for mail-in ballots to arrive.[416] Several Republican attorneys general filed amicus briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court in subsequent days agreeing with the Pennsylvania Republican Party's view that only the state legislature could change the voting deadline.[417]

By November 7, several prominent Republicans had publicly denounced Trump's claims of electoral fraud, saying they were unsubstantiated, baseless or without evidence, damaging to the election process, undermining democracy and dangerous to political stability while others supported his demand of transparency.[418] According to CNN, people close to Donald Trump, such as his son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner and his wife Melania Trump, urged him to accept his defeat. While Donald Trump privately acknowledged the outcome of the presidential election, he nonetheless encouraged his legal team to continue pursuing legal challenges.[419] Trump expected to win the election in Arizona, but when Fox News declared Biden the victor of the state, Trump became furious and claimed the result was due to fraud.[420] Trump and his allies suffered approximately 50 legal losses in four weeks after starting their litigation.[421] In view of these legal defeats, Trump began to employ "a public pressure campaign on state and local Republican officials to manipulate the electoral system on his behalf".[420][422][423][424]

Election protests

Spontaneous celebration of Trump's loss at Frederick Douglass Circle in New York City on November 7, 2020

Protests against Trump's challenges to the election results occurred in Minneapolis, Portland, New York, and other cities. Police in Minneapolis arrested more than 600 demonstrators for blocking traffic on an interstate highway. In Portland, the National Guard was called out after some protesters smashed windows and threw objects at police.[425] At the same time, groups of Trump supporters gathered outside of election centers in Phoenix, Detroit, and Philadelphia, shouting objections to counts that showed Biden leading or gaining ground.[425] In Arizona, where Biden's lead was shrinking as more results were reported, the pro-Trump protesters mostly demanded that all remaining votes be counted, while in Michigan and Pennsylvania, where Trump's lead shrank and disappeared altogether as more results were reported, they called for the count to be stopped.[426]

False claims of fraud

Screenshot of a tweet from Trump's Twitter account where he repeatedly and falsely claimed he had won.[427][428]
To sow election doubt, Trump escalated use of "rigged election" and "election interference" statements in advance of the 2024 election compared to the previous two elections—the statements described as part of a "heads I win; tails you cheated" rhetorical strategy.[429]

Trump and a variety of his surrogates and supporters made a series of observably false claims that the election was fraudulent. Claims that substantial fraud was committed have been repeatedly debunked.[430][431] On November 9 and 10, The New York Times called the offices of top election officials in every state; all 45 of those who responded said there was no evidence of fraud. Some described the election as remarkably successful considering the coronavirus pandemic, the record turnout, and the unprecedented number of mailed ballots.[27] On November 12, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a statement calling the 2020 election "the most secure in American history" and noting "[t]here is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."[29] Five days later, Trump fired the director of CISA, whom he had appointed in 2018.[432]

As ballots were still being counted two days after Election Day, Trump falsely asserted that there was "tremendous corruption and fraud going on", adding: "If you count the legal votes, I easily win. If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the election from us."[433] Trump has repeatedly claimed as suspicious that mail-in ballots showed significantly more support for Biden.[434] This blue shift phenomenon is believed to occur because more Democrats than Republicans tend to vote by mail, and mail ballots are counted after Election Day in many states. Leading up to the 2020 election, the effect was predicted to be even greater than usual, as Trump's attacks on mail-in voting may have deterred Republicans from casting mail ballots.[435]

In early January 2021, Trump falsely proclaimed that he had by rights won all 50 states in the presidential election and a 535 to 3 electoral college victory. On January 2, during his phone call to Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia Secretary of State, Trump said, "As you know, every single state. We won every state; we won every statehouse in the country... But we won every single statehouse."[436] Two days later, on January 4, Trump appeared at a campaign rally in Dalton, Georgia, supporting Republican senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler. During his speech at the rally, Trump again asserted that he won "every single state", and "We win every state, and they're going to have this guy [Biden] be President?"[437]

Many claims of purported voter fraud were discovered to be false or misleading. In Fulton County, Georgia, the number of votes affected was 342, with no breakdown of which candidates they were for.[438] A viral video of a Pennsylvania poll worker filling out a ballot was found to be a case of a damaged ballot being replicated to ensure proper counting, while a video claiming to show a man taking ballots illegally to a Detroit counting center was found to show a photographer transporting his equipment.[439][440] Another video of a poll watcher being turned away in Philadelphia was found to be real, but the poll watcher had subsequently been allowed inside after a misunderstanding had been resolved.[441] A viral tweet claimed 14,000 votes in Wayne County, Michigan, were cast by dead people, but the list of names included was found to be incorrect.[442] The Trump campaign and Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson also claimed a man named James Blalock had voted in Georgia despite having died in 2006, but in fact his 94-year-old widow had registered and voted as Mrs. James Blalock.[443] In Erie, Pennsylvania, a postal worker who claimed the postmaster had instructed postal workers to backdate ballots mailed after Election Day later admitted he had fabricated the claim. Prior to this recantation, Republican senator Lindsey Graham cited the claim in a letter to the Justice Department calling for an investigation, and a GoFundMe page created for the postal worker "patriot" raised $136,000.[444]

Days after Biden had been declared the winner, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany asserted without evidence that the Democratic Party was welcoming fraud and illegal voting.[445] Republican former speaker of the House Newt Gingrich stated on Fox News, "I think that it is a corrupt, stolen election."[446] Appearing at a press conference outside a Philadelphia landscaping business as Biden was being declared the winner, Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani asserted without evidence that hundreds of thousands of ballots were questionable.[447] Responding to Giuliani, a spokesperson for Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro said: "Many of the claims against the commonwealth have already been dismissed, and repeating these false attacks is reckless. No active lawsuit even alleges, and no evidence presented so far has shown, widespread problems."[27]

One week after the election, Republican Philadelphia city commissioner Al Schmidt said he had not seen any evidence of widespread fraud, stating, "I have seen the most fantastical things on social media, making completely ridiculous allegations that have no basis in fact at all and see them spread." He added that his office had examined a list of dead people who purportedly voted in Philadelphia but "not a single one of them voted in Philadelphia after they died." Trump derided Schmidt, tweeting, "He refuses to look at a mountain of corruption & dishonesty. We win!"[448]

Attorneys who brought accusations of voting fraud or irregularities before judges could not produce valid evidence to support the allegations. In one instance, a Trump attorney sought to have ballot counting halted in Detroit on the basis of a Republican poll watcher's claim that an unidentified person had said ballots were being backdated; Michigan Court of Appeals judge Cynthia Stephens dismissed the argument as "inadmissible hearsay within hearsay".[449][450] Some senior attorneys at law firms working for Trump, notably Jones Day, expressed concerns that they were undermining the integrity of American elections by advancing arguments without evidence.[451]

Trump and his lawyers Giuliani and Sidney Powell repeatedly made the false claim that the Toronto, Ontario-based firm Dominion Voting Systems, which had supplied voting machines for 27 states, was a "communist" organization controlled by billionaire George Soros, former Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez (who died in 2013), or the Chinese Communist Party, and that the machines had "stolen" hundreds of thousands of votes from Trump. Defamatory rumors about the company circulated on social media, amplified by more than a dozen tweets or retweets by Trump. The disinformation campaign prompted threats and harassment against Dominion employees.[452]

A December 2020 poll showed 77% of Republicans believed widespread fraud occurred during the election, along with 35% of independent voters.[453] Overall, 60% of Americans believed Biden's win was legitimate, 34% did not, and 6% were unsure. Another poll taken in late December showed a similar result, with 62% of Americans polled believing Biden was the legitimate winner of the election, while 37% did not.[454] This split in popular opinion remained largely stable, with a January 10, 2021, poll commissioned by ABC News showing 68% of Americans believed Biden's win was legitimate and 32% did not.[455] These numbers remained largely stagnant, with a June 2021 poll from Monmouth showing 61% believed Biden won fair and square, 32% believed he won due to fraud, and 7% were unsure.[456] More than a year later, public opinion on the matter still remained stagnant, with a poll commissioned by ABC News finding that 65% of Americans believed Biden's win was legitimate, 33% believed it was not legitimate, and 2% were unsure. The same poll also found that 72% of Americans thought the people involved in the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, were attacking democracy, while 25% thought they were protecting democracy, and 3% were unsure.[457] A March 2022 poll commissioned by the conservative Rasmussen Reports found that 52% of voters think that it is likely that cheating "affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election." while 40% of voters believe that it is unlikely. 33% say that cheating was very likely, 19% say it was somewhat likely, 13% say it was somewhat unlikely, and 27% say it was very unlikely.[458]

Motivated by the myth of widespread fraud, Republican state lawmakers initiated a push to make voting laws more restrictive.[459]

Lawsuits

After the election, the Trump campaign filed lawsuits in multiple states, including Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Pennsylvania.[460] Lawyers and other observers noted the suits were unlikely to affect the outcome. Loyola Law School professor Justin Levitt said, "There's literally nothing that I've seen yet with the meaningful potential to affect the final result."[461] Some law firms moved to drop their representation in lawsuits challenging results of the election.[462]

Trump unsuccessfully sought to overturn Biden's win in Georgia through litigation; suits by the Trump campaign and allies were rejected by both the Georgia Supreme Court[463] and by federal courts.[464][465] Trump also sought to overturn Biden's win by pressuring Kemp to call a special session of the Georgia General Assembly so state legislators could override the Georgia election results and appoint a pro-Trump slate of electors, an entreaty rebuffed by Kemp.[466]

On December 20, Giuliani filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking them to overturn the results of the Pennsylvania election and direct the state legislature to appoint electors. The Supreme Court was regarded as very unlikely to grant this petition, and in any case Biden would still have a majority of Electoral College votes without Pennsylvania.[467] The Court set the deadline for reply briefs from the respondents for January 22, 2021, two days after President Elect Biden's inauguration.[468]

Texas v. Pennsylvania

On December 9, Ken Paxton, the Attorney General of Texas, filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court, asking the court to overturn the results in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia. Attorneys general of seventeen other states also signed onto the lawsuit.[469][470][471] In the House of Representatives, 126 Republicans—more than two-thirds of the Republican caucus—signed an amicus brief in support of the lawsuit.[472] The suit was rejected by the Supreme Court on December 11, due to a lack of standing.[473][474]

Trump's refusal to concede

CNN fact checker Daniel Dale reported that through June 9, 2021, Trump had issued 132 written statements since leaving office, of which "a third have included lies about the election"—more than any other subject.[475]

Early in the morning on November 4, with vote counts still going on in many states, Trump claimed he had won: "This is an embarrassment to our country. We were getting ready to win this election, frankly we did win this election."[476] For weeks after the networks had called the election for Biden, Trump refused to acknowledge that Biden had won. Unlike every losing major party presidential candidate before him, Trump refused to formally concede, breaking with the tradition of formal concession started in 1896, when William Jennings Bryan sent a congratulatory telegram to President-elect William McKinley.[477] Biden described Trump's refusal as "an embarrassment".[478]

In the wake of the election, Trump's White House ordered government agencies not to cooperate with the Biden transition team in any way,[479] and the General Services Administration (GSA) refused to formally acknowledge Biden's victory,[480]

Trump finally acknowledged Biden's victory in a tweet on November 15, although he refused to concede and blamed his loss on fraud, stating: "He won because the Election was Rigged." Trump then tweeted: "I concede NOTHING! We have a long way to go."[481][482]

In a June 2021 interview with Sean Hannity, Trump stated that "we didn't win" and said that he wished President Biden success in international diplomacy, which Forbes declared as Trump "[coming] as close as he's ever been to conceding his 2020 election loss."[483]

GSA delays certifying Biden as president-elect

Although all major media outlets called the election for Biden on November 7, the head of the General Services Administration (GSA), Trump appointee Emily W. Murphy, refused for over two weeks to certify Biden as the president-elect. Without formal GSA ascertainment of the winner, the official transition process was delayed.[484] On November 23, Murphy acknowledged Biden as the winner and said the Trump administration would begin the transition. Trump said he had instructed his administration to "do what needs to be done" but did not concede, and indicated he would continue his fight to overturn the election results.[485]

Attempts to delay or deny election results

Texas v. Pennsylvania motion (left), which called for the Supreme Court to nullify the election, and amicus curiae brief from 17 states (right)

In November, Trump focused his efforts on trying to delay vote certifications at the county and state level.[486] On December 2, Trump posted a 46-minute video to his social media in which he repeated his baseless claims that the election was "rigged" and fraudulent, and he called for either state legislatures or courts to overturn the election and allow him to stay in office.[487] He continued to pressure elected Republicans in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania in an unprecedented attempt to overturn his loss. Some commentators have characterized Trump's actions as an attempted coup d'état or self-coup.[25]

On December 15, the day after the electoral college vote, Republican Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell, who was previously said he would not recognize the election results, publicly accepted Biden's win, saying, "Today, I want to congratulate President-elect Joe Biden."[488]

A December 18 meeting in the White House discussed Michael Flynn's suggestion to overturn the election by invoking martial law and rerunning the election in several swing states under military supervision.[489][490][491] Army Secretary Ryan D. McCarthy and Army Chief of Staff General James McConville later issued a joint statement saying: "There is no role for the U.S. military in determining the outcome of an American election."[492] In a December 20 tweet, Trump dismissed accusations that he wanted to declare martial law as "fake news".[493]

In a December 21 news conference, outgoing attorney general William Barr disavowed several actions reportedly being considered by Trump, including seizing voting machines, appointing a special counsel to investigate voter fraud, and appointing one to investigate Hunter Biden.[494]

Plot for state legislatures to choose electors

Both before and after the election, Trump and other Republican leaders publicly considered asking certain Republican-controlled state legislatures to select presidential electors favoring Trump, even if Biden won the popular vote in those states.[495] In Pennsylvania, a state which Biden won, the president's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani asked a federal judge to consider allowing the Republican-controlled state legislature to select electors.[496] Legal experts, including New York University law professor Richard Pildes, have raised numerous legal and political objections to this policy, noting that in various battleground states, Democratic Party members holding statewide office would thwart such efforts,[497] and ultimately Congress would probably reject the votes of legislatively appointed electors over those elected by the voters.[498] Law professor Lawrence Lessig noted that while the Constitution grants state legislatures the power to determine how electors are selected, including the power to directly appoint them, Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 gives Congress the power to determine when electors must be appointed, which they have designated to be Election Day, meaning that legislatures cannot change how electors are appointed for an election after this date.[499] In modern times, most states have used a popular vote within their state as the determining factor in who gets all the state's electors,[497] and changing election rules after an election could also violate the Constitution's Due Process Clause.[500]

Pressure on state and local officials

As the Trump campaign's lawsuits were repeatedly rejected in court, Trump personally communicated with Republican local and state officials in at least three states, including state legislators, attorneys general, and governors who had supported him during and after the elections. He pressured them to overturn the election results in their states by recounting votes, throwing out certain votes, or getting the state legislature to replace the elected Democratic slate of Electoral College members with a Republican slate of electors chosen by the legislature.[501] In late November, he personally phoned Republican members of two county electoral boards in Michigan, urging them to reverse their vote certifications.[502] He invited members of the Michigan state legislature to the White House, where they declined his suggestion that they choose a new slate of electors.[503] He repeatedly spoke to the Republican governor of Georgia and the secretary of state, demanding that they reverse their state's election results, and retaliating when they did not, strongly criticizing them in speeches and tweets, and demanding that the governor resign.[504]

During the first week of December, Trump twice phoned the speaker of the Pennsylvania state House of Representatives, urging him to appoint a replacement slate of electors; the speaker said he did not have that power but later joined in a letter encouraging the state's representatives in Congress to dispute the results.[501] On January 4 The Washington Post reported that in a phone call on January 2, Trump pressured Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger to overturn the state's result, telling him "I just want to find 11,780 votes" and threatening him with legal action if he did not cooperate.[34][505] On January 4, 2021, Democratic congressional leaders, believing Trump "engaged in solicitation of, or conspiracy to commit, a number of election crimes," requested the FBI to investigate the incident.[506] In addition, while some House Republicans tried to defend Trump's Georgia call, Democrats began drafting a censure resolution.[507] Two months later The Washington Post acknowledged that they had misquoted Trump, and added a correction to the article.[508] Also on January 2, 2021, Trump took part in a mass phone call with nearly 300 state legislators from Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, in which he urged them to "decertify" the election results in their states.[509]

Recounts

On November 11, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger ordered a statewide hand recount of the vote in addition to the normal audit process. At the time, Biden held a lead of 13,558 votes.[510] The audit was concluded on November 19 and affirmed Biden's lead by 12,284 votes. Therefore, the results of the hand recount netted Trump 1,274 votes. The change in the count was due to a number of human errors, including memory cards that did not upload properly to the state servers, and was not attributable to any fraud in the original tally.[511][512] After certifying the results Republican governor Brian Kemp called for another hand audit, demanding to compare signatures on absentee ballot requests to actual ballots, despite the fact that this request was impossible,[464] as signatures on mail-in ballot applications and envelopes are checked when they are originally received by election offices, and that ballots are thereafter separated from envelopes to ensure the secrecy of the ballot.[513][514] The Trump campaign requested a machine recount, which was estimated to cost taxpayers $200,000 in one Georgia county alone.[515] On December 7, Biden was confirmed as the winner of the recount requested by Trump's campaign.[464]

On November 18, the Trump campaign wired $3 million to pay for partial recounts in Milwaukee County and Dane County, Wisconsin, where Milwaukee and Madison, the two largest cities in the state and Democratic strongholds, are located.[516][517] During the recount, Milwaukee County election commissioner Tim Posnanski said several Republican observers were breaking rules by posing as independents.[518] The recount started November 20 and concluded on November 29, increasing Biden's lead by 87 votes.[519]

Electoral College votes

The presidential electors met in the state capitol of each state and in the District of Columbia on December 14, 2020, and formalized Biden's victory, casting 306 votes for Biden/Harris and 232 votes for Trump/Pence.[520][521] Unlike the 2016 election, there were no faithless electors.[522] In six swing states won by Biden, groups of self-appointed Republican "alternate electors" met on the same day to vote for Trump. These alternate slates were not signed by the governors of the states they claim to represent, did not have the backing of any state legislature, and have no legal status.[521][523]

Even after the casting of the electoral votes and rejection of his lawsuits seeking to overturn the election by at least 86 judges,[521] Trump refused to concede defeat.[520][521][524] In a speech following the Electoral College vote, Biden praised the resiliency of U.S. democratic institutions and the high election turnout (calling it "one of the most amazing demonstrations of civic duty we've ever seen in our country") and called for national unity. Biden also condemned Trump, and those who backed his efforts to subvert the election outcome, for adopting a stance "so extreme that we've never seen it before – a position that refused to respect the will of the people, refused to respect the rule of law and refused to honor our Constitution" and for exposing state election workers and officials to "political pressure, verbal abuse and even threats of physical violence" that was "simply unconscionable".[525][524]

Certification and January 6th

Pro-Trump rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6

The 117th United States Congress first convened on January 3, 2021, and was scheduled to count and certify the Electoral College votes on January 6, 2021. There were 222 Democrats and 212 Republicans in the House; there were 51 Republicans, 46 Democrats, and two independents in the Senate. Several Republican members of the House and Senate said they would raise objections to the reported count in several states,[526][527] meeting the requirement that if a member from each body objects, the two houses must meet separately to discuss whether to accept the certified state vote.[528][529] A statement from the vice president's office said Pence welcomes the plan by Republicans to "raise objections and bring forward evidence" challenging the election results.[530]

On December 28, 2020, Representative Louie Gohmert filed a lawsuit in Texas challenging the constitutionality of the Electoral Count Act of 1887, claiming Vice President Pence has the power and ability to unilaterally decide which slates of electoral votes get counted.[531][532] The case was dismissed on January 1, 2021, for lack of both standing and jurisdiction.[533][534] The plaintiffs filed an appeal, and the appeal was dismissed by a three-judge panel of the appeals court the next day.[535]

As vice president, Pence was due to preside over the January 6, 2021, congressional session to count the electoral votes, which is normally a non-controversial, ceremonial event. In January 2021, Trump began to pressure Pence to take action to overturn the election, demanding both in public and in private that Pence use his position to overturn the election results in swing states and declare Trump and Pence the winners of the election.[536] Pence demurred that the law does not give him that power.[537]

Starting in December, Trump called for his supporters to stage a massive protest in Washington, D.C., on January 6 to argue against certification of the electoral vote, using tweets such as "Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!"[538] D.C. police were concerned, and the National Guard was alerted because several rallies in December had turned violent.[539]

On January 6, 2021, shortly after Trump continued to press false claims of election fraud at a rally on the Ellipse in Washington, D.C., a crowd of Trump supporters stormed the United States Capitol, interrupting the Joint session of the United States Congress where the Electoral College ballots were being certified and forcing lawmakers to flee the chamber. As part of an organized effort by Republican lawmakers to challenge the results in close states, the House and the Senate were meeting separately to debate the results of Arizona's election and accepting the electoral college ballots submitted. Several other challenges were also planned. Congress reconvened that same night, after the Capitol was cleared of trespassers, and leaders of both parties, including Vice President Mike Pence, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Senate Speaker Mitch McConnell urged the legislators to confirm the electors. The Senate resumed its session at around 8:00 p.m. to finish debating the objection to the Arizona and Pennsylvania electors were also considered. The joint session completed its work shortly before 4:00 a.m. on Thursday, January 7, declaring Biden and Harris the winners.[540][541][542][543][544][545][546]

The rioters entered the House and Senate chambers and vandalized offices. Five people died as a result: one person was shot by police, one Capitol Police officer died from a stroke after fisticuffs with rioters,[547] one person died of a heart attack, another of a stroke, and the final death is still under investigation. Trump was accused of inciting the violence with his rhetoric,[548] an accusation reinforced with an article of impeachment on January 13 for "incitement of insurrection".[549] Several commentators viewed the attack on the Capitol Building as an indicator of political instability that could lead to political violence in future elections, ranging from domestic terrorism to a second American Civil War.[550][551][552][553][554][555]

Post-certification

On May 10, 2021, over 120 retired U.S. generals and admirals published an open letter alleging that there had been "election irregularities", suggesting that the election had not been "fair and honest" and did not "accurately reflect the "will of the people", and arguing for tighter restrictions on voting.[556] On May 12, 2021, U.S. Representative Liz Cheney was removed from her party leadership role as Chair of the House Republican Conference, partially for continuing to assert that the election had been fair and that the election results were final.[557][558][559]

Well into Biden's presidency, Trump continues to insist that he had actually won the 2020 election.[560] As of August 2021, surveys found that a majority of Republicans believe it.[561] A widespread rumor predicted that Trump would be somehow reinstated to the presidency in August 2021, although the predicted date of August 13 passed without incident.[562]

Election audits

On March 31, 2021, the Republican caucus of the Arizona State Senate hired several outside firms to examine the results of the presidential and senatorial elections in Maricopa County, where Biden had won by a large margin.[563] There had been three previous audits and recounts of that county's results.[564] The examination was initially funded by $150,000 from the State Senate operating budget; additional funding was to come from outside sources.[565] In July the lead firm conducting the review released a summary of major donors, indicating $5.7 million was raised from five groups associated with individuals who had cast doubt on the presidential election.[566] The audit began on April 22, 2021, and was expected to last 60 days.[567] The investigation was still ongoing in August when a judge issued an order for the release of documents.[568] On September 24, a preliminary release of the audit claimed to have found minor discrepancies in the original, state-certified count, which had actually widened Biden's margin by 360 votes.[569]

Viewership

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b About 64% of voters voted early before November 3 in person or by mail, with the earliest state starting on September 4.[7][8]
  2. ^ The Federal Election Commission calculated a voter turnout of 62.8% in 2020, as the votes for president divided by the estimated U.S. population at or over age 18.[1] The denominator included U.S. residents ineligible to vote due to not being U.S. citizens or due to a criminal conviction, and excluded U.S. citizens residing in other countries who were eligible to vote. This turnout was an increase of 7.1pp compared to the turnout of 55.7% in the 2016 election, calculated by the same institution with the same basis.[2]

    The U.S. Census Bureau calculated a voter turnout of 66.8% in 2020, as the people reporting having voted divided by the estimated U.S. population at or over age 18 who were U.S. citizens. The denominator excluded U.S. residents ineligible to vote due to not being U.S. citizens, but included those ineligible due to a criminal conviction and excluded U.S. citizens residing in other countries who were eligible to vote. This turnout was an increase of 5.4pp compared to the turnout of 61.4% in the 2016 election, calculated by the same institution with the same basis.[3]

    The U.S. Elections Project calculated a voter turnout of 66.6% in 2020, as the total ballots divided by the estimated population that was eligible to vote.[4] The denominator excluded U.S. residents ineligible to vote due to not being U.S. citizens or due to a criminal conviction, and included U.S. citizens residing in other countries who were eligible to vote. This turnout was an increase of 6.5pp compared to the turnout of 60.1% in the 2016 election, calculated by the same institution with the same basis.[5]
  3. ^ Trump's official state of residence was New York in the 2016 election, but it was changed to Florida when his permanent residence was switched from Trump Tower to Mar-a-Lago in 2019.[6]
  4. ^ The previous two female vice presidential nominees were Geraldine Ferraro in 1984 and Sarah Palin in 2008.
  5. ^ Although claimed in Hawkins's campaign website, he did not obtain write-in access in Montana.[71]
  6. ^ Candidates in bold were listed on ballots of states representing most of the electoral college. Other candidates were listed on ballots of more than one state and were listed on ballots or were write-in candidates in states representing most of the electoral college.
  7. ^ In some states, some presidential candidates were listed with a different or no vice presidential candidate.
  8. ^ In some states, some candidates were listed with a different or additional party, a label, or as independent or unaffiliated.
  9. ^ Andrew Johnson received votes during the 1868 Democratic National Convention, four months after having been impeached.[90]
  10. ^ Following the cancellation of the planned second debate on October 9, both candidates held separate but simultaneous televised town hall events on the intended date of October 15. Trump's was broadcast on NBC, moderated by Savannah Guthrie, while Biden's was on ABC, moderated by George Stephanopoulos.[256]
  11. ^ a b Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  12. ^ Tossup: 50%–59%, Lean: 60%–74%, Likely: 75%–94%, Solid: 95%–100%
  13. ^ Although Ronald Reagan in 1980 and Bill Clinton in 1992 defeated their incumbent opponents by wider popular-vote margins than Biden's, their shares of the vote were kept lower by substantial third-party voting.
  14. ^ Percentage point difference in margin from the 2016 election
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r These candidates may have received write-in votes, which were not reported individually and are included in others.
  16. ^ a b Votes for Jesse Ventura and Cynthia McKinney, who were nominated to the ballot by the Green Party of Alaska instead of the national candidates,[347] are included in others. Hawkins/Walker may have received write-in votes, which were not reported individually and are also included in others.
  17. ^ Others and total votes include votes for the ballot option "none of these candidates", which are counted as valid votes by the Nevada Secretary of State.
  18. ^ Additional candidates may have received write-in votes, which were not reported and are not included in others, total votes or percentages.
  19. ^ This table reflects the results certified by the state, which recorded some write-in votes differently from those reported by some counties.[348][349]
  1. ^ In every presidential election from 1788–89 through 1828, multiple state legislatures selected their presidential electors by discretionary appointment rather than upon the results of a poll, while the South Carolina General Assembly did so in every presidential election through 1860 and the Colorado General Assembly selected its state's electors by discretionary appointment in the 1876 election.

References

  1. ^ a b c d e "Federal Elections 2020" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. October 2022.
  2. ^ "Federal Elections 2016" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. December 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2019. Retrieved November 25, 2020.
  3. ^ Table A-1. Reported Voting and Registration by Race, Hispanic Origin, Sex and Age Groups: November 1964 to 2020 Archived August 28, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Census Bureau.
  4. ^ a b "2020 November General Election Turnout Rates". www.electproject.org. Archived from the original on April 30, 2021. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
  5. ^ "2016 November General Election Turnout Rates". www.electproject.org.
  6. ^ Choi, Matthew (October 31, 2019). "Trump, a symbol of New York, is officially a Floridian now". Politico. Archived from the original on January 6, 2020. Retrieved October 31, 2019.
  7. ^ Knight, Stef W.; Ahmed, Naema (August 13, 2020). "When and how to vote in all 50 states". Axios. Archived from the original on January 12, 2021. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  8. ^ McDonald, Michael (November 6, 2020). "2020 General Election Early Vote Statistics". U.S. Elections Project. Archived from the original on January 17, 2021. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  9. ^ "Biden officially secures enough electors to become president". Associated Press News. December 5, 2020. Archived from the original on December 8, 2020. Retrieved December 6, 2020.
  10. ^ a b "Joe Biden Crosses 80 million votes". Newsweek. Archived from the original on November 24, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
  11. ^ a b Lewis, Sophie (November 7, 2020). "Joe Biden breaks Obama's record for most votes ever cast for a U.S presidential candidate". CBS News. Archived from the original on December 29, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  12. ^ "Republican Convention 2020". www.thegreenpapers.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2020. Retrieved December 9, 2022.
  13. ^ *Edsall, Thomas B. (June 3, 2020). "Opinion: The George Floyd Election". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 12, 2020. Retrieved October 13, 2020.
  14. ^ Saul, Stephanie; Hakim, Danny (November 3, 2020). "As Counting Begins, a Flood of Mail Ballots Complicates Vote Tallies". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  15. ^ Yoder, Kyle; Tan, April; Martinez-Ruiz, Stefan (March 1, 2024). "The Expansion of Voting Before Election Day, 2000-2024" (PDF). Center for Election Innovation & Research. Retrieved September 10, 2024.
  16. ^ Otterbein, Holly (November 3, 2020). "Democrats return nearly three times as many mail-in ballots as Republicans in Pennsylvania". Politico. Archived from the original on February 10, 2021. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
  17. ^ "The 2020 voting experience: Coronavirus, mail concerns factored into deciding how to vote". Pew Research Center – U.S. Politics & Policy. November 20, 2020. Archived from the original on June 27, 2021. Retrieved June 28, 2021.
  18. ^ a b Wolf, Zachary (October 17, 2020). "It's not magic, it's math. Here's how CNN makes election projections". CNN. Archived from the original on November 26, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  19. ^ a b "Joe Biden wins Georgia, turning the state blue for first time since '92". KUTV. November 13, 2020. Archived from the original on November 13, 2020. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  20. ^ "Biden Takes Electoral Vote in 2nd District, Trump Wins Nebraska's 4 Other Votes". Nebraska Public Media. Retrieved October 13, 2022.
  21. ^ *Cohen, Marshall (November 5, 2021). "Timeline of the coup: How Trump tried to weaponize the Justice Department to overturn the 2020 election". CNN. Retrieved June 12, 2023.
  22. ^ Haberman, Maggie; Savage, Charlie; Broadwater, Luke (August 8, 2023). "Previously Secret Memo Laid Out Strategy for Trump to Overturn Biden's Win - The House Jan. 6 committee's investigation did not uncover the memo, whose existence first came to light in last week's indictment". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 9, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  23. ^ *Pennycook, Gordon; Rand, D. G. (2021). "Examining false beliefs about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 Presidential Election". Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-51. hdl:1721.1/144267. Archived from the original on August 26, 2021. Retrieved August 26, 2021. The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election saw an unprecedented number of false claims alleging election fraud and arguing that Donald Trump was the actual winner of the election.
  24. ^ Multiple sources:
    • Harvey, Michael (2022). "Introduction: History's Rhymes". In Harvey, Michael (ed.). Donald Trump in Historical Perspective. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003110361-1. ISBN 978-1-003-11036-1. Archived from the original on June 15, 2022. Retrieved September 21, 2024. As with the Beer Hall Putsch, a would-be leader tried to take advantage of an already scheduled event (in Hitler's case, Kahr's speech; in Trump's, Congress's tallying of the electoral votes) to create a dramatic moment with himself at the center of attention, calling for bold action to upend the political order. Unlike Hitler's coup attempt, Trump already held top of office, so he was attempting to hold onto power, not seize it (the precise term for Trump's intended action is a 'self-coup' or 'autogolpe'). Thus, Trump was able to plan for the event well in advance, and with much greater control, including developing the legal arguments that could be used to justify rejecting the election's results. (p3)
    • Pion-Berlin, David; Bruneau, Thomas; Goetze, Richard B. Jr. (April 7, 2022). "The Trump self-coup attempt: comparisons and civil–military relations". Government and Opposition. FirstView (4): 789–806. doi:10.1017/gov.2022.13. S2CID 248033246.
    • Castañeda, Ernesto; Jenks, Daniel (April 17, 2023). Costa, Bruno Ferreira; Parton, Nigel (eds.). "January 6th and De-Democratization in the United States". Social Sciences. 12 (4). MDPI: 238. doi:10.3390/socsci12040238. ISSN 2076-0760. What the United States went through on January 6th was an attempt at a self-coup, where Trump would use force to stay as head of state even if abandoning democratic practices in the U.S. Some advised Trump to declare martial law to create a state of emergency and use that as an excuse to stay in power.
    • Eisen, Norman; Ayer, Donald; Perry, Joshua; Bookbinder, Noah; Perry, E. Danya (June 6, 2022). Trump on Trial: A Guide to the January 6 Hearings and the Question of Criminality (Report). Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on June 9, 2022. Retrieved December 16, 2023. [Trump] tried to delegitimize the election results by disseminating a series of far fetched and evidence-free claims of fraud. Meanwhile, with a ring of close confidants, Trump conceived and implemented unprecedented schemes to – in his own words – "overturn" the election outcome. Among the results of this "Big Lie" campaign were the terrible events of January 6, 2021 – an inflection point in what we now understand was nothing less than an attempted coup.
    • Eastman v Thompson, et al., 8:22-cv-00099-DOC-DFM Document 260, 44 (S.D. Cal. May 28, 2022) ("Dr. Eastman and President Trump launched a campaign to overturn a democratic election, an action unprecedented in American history. Their campaign was not confined to the ivory tower – it was a coup in search of a legal theory. The plan spurred violent attacks on the seat of our nation's government, led to the deaths of several law enforcement officers, and deepened public distrust in our political process... If Dr. Eastman and President Trump's plan had worked, it would have permanently ended the peaceful transition of power, undermining American democracy and the Constitution. If the country does not commit to investigating and pursuing accountability for those responsible, the Court fears January 6 will repeat itself."), archived from the original.
    • Graham, David A. (January 6, 2021). "This Is a Coup". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2023.
    • Musgrave, Paul (January 6, 2021). "This Is a Coup. Why Were Experts So Reluctant to See It Coming?". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2023.
    • Solnit, Rebecca (January 6, 2021). "Call it what it was: a coup attempt". The Guardian. Archived from the original on January 7, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2023.
    • Coleman, Justine (January 6, 2021). "GOP lawmaker on violence at Capitol: 'This is a coup attempt'". The Hill. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2023.
    • Jacobson, Louis (January 6, 2021). "Is this a coup? Here's some history and context to help you decide". PolitiFact. Archived from the original on June 20, 2022. Retrieved January 7, 2021. A good case can be made that the storming of the Capitol qualifies as a coup. It's especially so because the rioters entered at precisely the moment when the incumbent's loss was to be formally sealed, and they succeeded in stopping the count.
    • Barry, Dan; Frenkel, Sheera (January 7, 2021). "'Be There. Will Be Wild!': Trump All but Circled the Date". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2023.
    • Duignan, Brian (August 4, 2021). "January 6 U.S. Capitol attack". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on January 17, 2023. Retrieved September 22, 2021. Because its object was to prevent a legitimate president-elect from assuming office, the attack was widely regarded as an insurrection or attempted coup d'état.
  25. ^ a b c Multiple sources:
  26. ^ Balsamo, Michael (December 1, 2020). "Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on December 1, 2020. Retrieved December 1, 2020.
  27. ^ a b c Corasaniti, Nick; Epstein, Reid; Rutenberg, Jim (November 10, 2020). "The Times Called Officials in Every State: No Evidence of Voter Fraud". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  28. ^ Denean, Austin (November 12, 2020). "DHS agency: 'Nov. 3 election was most secure in American history'". ABC 3340. Sinclair Broadcast Group. Archived from the original on April 19, 2021. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  29. ^ a b "Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees". Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. November 12, 2020. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  30. ^ Chen, Shawna (November 12, 2020). "Department of Homeland Security calls election 'the most secure in American history'". Axios. Archived from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  31. ^ "Here are the Republican members of Congress who signed on to the suit to throw out the votes in 4 states". Yahoo! News. December 11, 2020. Archived from the original on January 8, 2021. Retrieved December 12, 2020.
  32. ^ *Collins, Kaitlan; Bennett, Kate; Diamond, Jeremy; Liptak, Kevin (November 8, 2020). "Jared Kushner has approached Donald Trump to concede and Melania Trump advised the President to accept the loss". CNN. Archived from the original on November 16, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  33. ^ Pengelly, Martin (December 21, 2020). "Conspiracy-theorist lawyer Sidney Powell spotted again at White House". The Guardian. Archived from the original on January 3, 2021. Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  34. ^ a b Gardner, Amy (January 3, 2021). "'I just want to find 11,780 votes': In extraordinary hour-long call, Trump pressures Georgia secretary of state to recalculate the vote in his favor". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 4, 2021. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  35. ^ "Trump urged Justice officials to declare election "corrupt"". Associated Press News. July 30, 2021. Archived from the original on August 4, 2021. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
  36. ^ "DOJ officials rejected colleague's request to intervene in Georgia's election certification: Emails". ABC News. August 3, 2021. Archived from the original on August 13, 2021. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
  37. ^ Tapper, Jake (December 31, 2020). "At least 140 House Republicans to vote against counting electoral votes, two GOP lawmakers say". CNN. Archived from the original on January 5, 2021. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  38. ^ Treene, Alayna (January 2, 2021). "Multiple senators oppose certifying election results". Axios. Archived from the original on March 6, 2021. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  39. ^ "Capitol riots: Did Trump's words at rally incite violence?". BBC News. February 14, 2021. Retrieved November 6, 2024.
  40. ^ *Zilbermints, Regina (January 6, 2021). "Trump puts pressure on Republicans, says he will 'never concede'". The Hill. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  41. ^ *"Biden sets to work on reversing Trump policies with executive orders". BBC News. January 21, 2021. Archived from the original on February 10, 2021. Retrieved January 21, 2021.
  42. ^ Waxman, Olivia B. (January 19, 2021). "As Trump Plans to Skip Biden's Swearing In, Here Are 3 Other U.S. Presidents Who Dodged Their Successors' Inauguration". Time. Archived from the original on January 20, 2021. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  43. ^ Brooke Singman, Andrea Margolis (November 25, 2024). "Judge grants Jack Smith's request to dismiss Jan. 6 charges, appeal in classified records case against Trump". Fox News. Retrieved November 25, 2024.
  44. ^ "US Election guide: how does the election work?". The Daily Telegraph. November 6, 2012. Archived from the original on November 10, 2015. Retrieved October 29, 2015.
  45. ^ Neale, Thomas H. (October 22, 2020). "The Electoral College: A 2020 Presidential Election Timeline". Congressional Research Service. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved November 9, 2020.
  46. ^ Miller, Kevin (August 26, 2019). "Maine Senate passes ranked-choice voting for March presidential primaries". Portland Press Herald. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
  47. ^ Shepherd, Michael (August 28, 2019). "Maine might switch to a ranked-choice presidential election. Here's how it would look". CBS 13. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
  48. ^ Piper, Jessica (August 28, 2020). "Maine secretary of state appeals decision putting ranked-choice voting challenge on ballot". Bangor Daily News. Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
  49. ^ Leary, Mal (August 26, 2020). "Judge: Ranked-Choice Voting Repeal Qualifies For Maine November Ballot". WBUR. Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
  50. ^ Mannino, Gabrielle (September 2020). "Ranked choice voting for president still uncertain following court ruling". News Center Maine. Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved September 11, 2020.
  51. ^ "Maine ballots sent to printer with ranked-choice voting for president, no people's veto". WGME. September 9, 2020. Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved September 11, 2020.
  52. ^ Reimann, Nicholas (September 8, 2020). "Maine Will Be The First-Ever State To Use Ranked-Choice Voting For A Presidential Election". Forbes. Archived from the original on September 11, 2020. Retrieved September 11, 2020.
  53. ^ Mannino, Gabrielle (September 22, 2020). "Court rules in favor of Sec. of State clearing way for RCV in presidential election". News Center Maine. Archived from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved September 22, 2020.
  54. ^ Howe, Amy (October 6, 2020). "Breyer rejects Republicans' plea to stop ranked-choice voting in Maine". SCOTUSblog. Archived from the original on October 8, 2020. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  55. ^ Shepherd, Michael (September 6, 2019). "Maine will use ranked-choice voting in next year's presidential election – but not the 2020 primaries". Bangor Daily News. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
  56. ^ Muller, Derek T. (July 10, 2019). "Maine, ranked choice voting, and the National Popular Vote Compact". Excess of Democracy. Archived from the original on May 21, 2020. Retrieved January 14, 2020.
  57. ^ "The Latest: California pushes Biden to Electoral College win". Mercury News. Associated Press. December 14, 2020. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
  58. ^ "Legal provisions relevant to the Electoral College process". National Archives and Records Administration. September 5, 2019. Archived from the original on January 8, 2021. Retrieved December 9, 2020.
  59. ^ "2020 Electoral College Results". National Archives. November 5, 2019. Archived from the original on January 13, 2021. Retrieved December 17, 2020.
  60. ^ Cochrane, Emily; Fandos, Nicholas (January 6, 2021). "After Pro-Trump Mob Storms Capitol, Congress Confirms Biden's Win". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  61. ^ Montellaro, Zach (June 5, 2020). "Biden clinches Democratic presidential nomination". Politico. Archived from the original on June 9, 2020. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
  62. ^ Olorunnipa, Toluse; Janes, Chelsea; Sonmez, Felicia; Itkowitz, Colby; Wagner, John (August 19, 2020). "Joe Biden officially becomes the Democratic Party's nominee on convention's second night". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 3, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2021.
  63. ^ Egan, Lauren (August 24, 2020). "Trump officially becomes Republican nominee after delegates' roll call". NBC News. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2021.
  64. ^ "2020 Republican Primary Election Results". USA Today. Archived from the original on February 10, 2021. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
  65. ^ Doherty, Brian (May 23, 2020). "Jo Jorgensen Wins Libertarian Party Presidential Nomination". Reason. Archived from the original on May 24, 2020. Retrieved August 7, 2020.
  66. ^ Voskuil, Connor (September 16, 2020). "LP Presidential Nominee On The Ballot in All 50 States Plus DC". Libertarian Party. Archived from the original on October 9, 2020. Retrieved January 26, 2021.
  67. ^ Nam, Rafael (June 21, 2020). "Howie Hawkins clinches Green Party's nomination after primary wins". The Hill. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
  68. ^ Winger, Richard (July 11, 2020). "Green Party Nominates Howie Hawkins for President on First Ballot". Ballot Access News. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020. Retrieved July 11, 2020.
  69. ^ "Ballot Access". Howie Hawkins 2020. June 28, 2019. Archived from the original on September 15, 2020. Retrieved September 15, 2020.
  70. ^ Weiner, Mark (October 5, 2020). "Syracuse's Howie Hawkins on his 30-state presidential bid: I'm not a spoiler". Syracuse.com. Archived from the original on January 1, 2021. Retrieved February 25, 2021.
  71. ^ 2020 statewide general election canvass, abstract of write-in votes Archived March 18, 2023, at the Wayback Machine, Montana Secretary of State.
  72. ^ Merica, Dan (June 15, 2018). "Exclusive: Democrats, anticipating heated primary, set earlier 2020 convention date". CNN. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved June 15, 2018.
  73. ^ Korecki, Natasha; Thompson, Alex (March 11, 2019). "DNC picks Milwaukee to host 2020 convention". Politico. Archived from the original on April 12, 2020. Retrieved March 11, 2019.
  74. ^ a b "Selection of Site for 2020 Presidential Nominating ConventionANM". Green National Committee. 2019. Archived from the original on April 7, 2020. Retrieved August 19, 2019.
  75. ^ Smith, Allan; Vitali, Ali (April 3, 2020). "Democratic Party delays July convention until August over coronavirus concerns". NBC News. Archived from the original on May 23, 2020. Retrieved April 23, 2020.
  76. ^ Brewster, Adam; Watson, Eleanor; O'Keefe, Edward (June 24, 2020). "Democratic Party reveals scaled-down convention plan". CBS News. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved June 25, 2020.
  77. ^ Epstein, Reid J.; Glueck, Katie (August 5, 2020). "Biden's Milwaukee Trip Is Canceled, and So Is a Normal Presidential Campaign". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 7, 2020. Retrieved August 7, 2020.
  78. ^ Clark, Dartunurro (June 11, 2020). "RNC picks Jacksonville, Florida, as convention site for Trump to accept GOP nomination". NBC News. Archived from the original on June 16, 2020. Retrieved June 11, 2020.
  79. ^ Morrill, Jim; Funk, Tim; Murphy, Kate (June 11, 2020). "It's official. RNC convention will head to Jacksonville after 1 day in Charlotte". The Charlotte Observer. Archived from the original on June 29, 2020. Retrieved June 11, 2020.
  80. ^ Morrill, Jim (July 24, 2020). "After Trump cancels Jacksonville events, RNC is back where it was – in Charlotte". The Charlotte Observer. Archived from the original on July 27, 2020. Retrieved July 27, 2020.
  81. ^ Winger, Richard (December 11, 2017). "Libertarian Party Sets Location and Date of 2020 Presidential Convention". Ballot Access News. Archived from the original on December 24, 2017. Retrieved December 23, 2017.
  82. ^ Francis, Eric (December 21, 2017). "An alternative to the right/left political menu". California Catholic Daily. Archived from the original on December 6, 2018. Retrieved December 6, 2018.
  83. ^ Hayes, Daniel (April 26, 2020). "COVID-19 and the Libertarian National Convention". LNC 2020. Archived from the original on April 29, 2020. Retrieved April 26, 2020.
  84. ^ Winger, Richard (May 9, 2020). "Libertarian Party Will Use On-Line Process to Choose National Ticket in Late May, Then Hold an In-Person July Convention for Other Business". Ballot Access News. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved May 10, 2020.
  85. ^ Winger, Richard (April 24, 2020). "Green Party Presidential Convention Will be Virtual". Ballot Access News. Archived from the original on June 1, 2020. Retrieved April 24, 2020.
  86. ^ Fandos, Nicholas; Shear, Michael D. (December 18, 2019). "Trump Impeached for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
  87. ^ Naylor, Brian; Walsh, Dierdre (January 21, 2020). "After 13 Hours Of Fiery Debate, Senate Adopts Impeachment Trial Rules". NPR. Retrieved February 3, 2020.
  88. ^ Cheney, Kyle; Desiderio, Andrew; Bresnahan, John (February 5, 2020). "Trump acquitted on impeachment charges, ending gravest threat to his presidency". Politico. Archived from the original on June 17, 2020. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
  89. ^ "1868 Democratic Convention". History Central. Archived from the original on October 8, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  90. ^ Varon, Elizabeth R. (2019). "Andrew Johnson: Campaigns and Elections". Miller Center. University of Virginia. Archived from the original on September 3, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
  91. ^ Smith, David (January 31, 2020). "Trump rails against "deranged" foes as Iowa rally clashes with impeachment trial". The Guardian. Retrieved February 3, 2020.
  92. ^ Friedman, Matt (January 28, 2020). "Missing from Trump's rally: An impeachment diatribe". Politico. Retrieved February 3, 2020.
  93. ^ Caputo, Marc (November 1, 2019). "'There's no model for this': Impeachment timeline crashes into Democratic primary". Politico. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
  94. ^ Milligan, Susan (January 30, 2020). "Senators Campaign in Iowa Remotely as They Wait in Washington Through Trump's Trial". U.S. News. Retrieved February 3, 2020.
  95. ^ Everett, Burgess (January 10, 2020). "'Don't tell me it doesn't matter': Impeachment trial hurts presidential campaigns". Politico. Retrieved February 3, 2020.
  96. ^ Glueck, Katie (March 11, 2020). "Joe Biden Will Host "Virtual Events" as Coronavirus Fears Heat Up". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 18, 2020. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  97. ^ Ember, Sydney; Karni, Annie; Haberman, Maggie (March 10, 2020). "Sanders and Biden Cancel Events as Coronavirus Fears Upend Primary". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 10, 2020. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  98. ^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 12, 2020). "Trump says he'll likely curtail rallies amid coronavirus". The Hill. Archived from the original on June 18, 2020. Retrieved March 24, 2020.
  99. ^ "Democratic debate moved from Arizona to Washington, DC, over coronavirus concerns, DNC announces". CNN. March 12, 2020. Archived from the original on August 30, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  100. ^ "Georgia presidential primaries postponed over coronavirus concerns". USA Today. Associated Press. March 15, 2020. Archived from the original on March 17, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  101. ^ Sullivan, Kate (March 16, 2020). "Kentucky secretary of state says primary postponed". CNN. Archived from the original on October 11, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  102. ^ Pramuk, Jacob (March 13, 2020). "Louisiana postpones Democratic primary over coronavirus, the first state to do so". CNBC. Archived from the original on July 9, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  103. ^ Rouan, Rick; Futty, John (March 16, 2020). "Coronavirus: Ohio Supreme Court allows delay to primary election". The Columbus Dispatch. Archived from the original on June 19, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  104. ^ Ollstein, Alice Miranda; Montellaro, Zach (March 17, 2020). "Maryland postpones primary, shifts special election to mail voting over coronavirus". Politico. Archived from the original on May 28, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  105. ^ Goodkind, Nicole (March 19, 2020). "10 questions about the 2020 election during the coronavirus pandemic, answered". Fortune. Archived from the original on April 24, 2020. Retrieved March 25, 2020.
  106. ^ Garrison, Joey (March 17, 2020). "As coronavirus pandemic delays 2020 primaries, is it time to worry about the November election?". USA Today. Archived from the original on June 16, 2020. Retrieved March 25, 2020.
  107. ^ Lerer, Lisa; Epstein, Reid J. (March 12, 2020). "How the Coronavirus Changed the 2020 Campaign". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 30, 2020. Retrieved March 25, 2020.
  108. ^ Kamarck, Elaine; Ibreak, Yoused; Powers, Amanda; Stewart, Chris (August 2020). "Voting by mail in a pandemic: A state-by-state scorecard". The Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on August 14, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  109. ^ Whitesides, John; Renshaw, Jarrett (June 2, 2020). "Confusion, long lines at some poll sites as eight U.S. states vote during coronavirus pandemic". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  110. ^ Cillizza, Chris (May 26, 2020). "Here's the *real* reason Donald Trump is attacking mail-in ballots". CNN. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  111. ^ Haberman, Maggie; Corasaniti, Nick; Qiu, Linda (June 24, 2020). "Trump's False Attacks on Voting by Mail Stir Broad Concern". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on July 29, 2020. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  112. ^ Lerer, Lisa; Epstein, Reid J. (March 12, 2020). "How the Coronavirus Changed the 2020 Campaign". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 30, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  113. ^ Stanage, Niall (March 21, 2020). "The Memo: Democrats grapple with virus response". The Hill. Archived from the original on May 23, 2020. Retrieved March 25, 2020.
  114. ^ Parks, Miles (April 15, 2020). "'In The End, The Voters Responded': Surprising Takeaways From Wisconsin's Election". NPR. Archived from the original on June 18, 2020. Retrieved April 21, 2020.
  115. ^ Neely, Brett; Silver, Maayan (April 21, 2020). "Milwaukee Claims 7 Coronavirus Cases Tied To Controversial Wisconsin Election". NPR. Archived from the original on June 19, 2020. Retrieved April 21, 2020.
  116. ^ "Trump's Oklahoma rally can go ahead, court rules". BBC News. June 20, 2020. Archived from the original on June 20, 2020. Retrieved June 22, 2020.
  117. ^ Lutz, Tom (June 22, 2020). "Brad Parscale faces Trump "fury" after Tulsa comeback rally flops". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 22, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  118. ^ Swanson, Ian (June 22, 2020). "Trump rally delivers Saturday-record 7.7 million viewers on Fox News". The Hill. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
  119. ^ Carlisle, Madeleine (July 11, 2020). "Three Weeks After Trump's Tulsa Rally, Oklahoma Reports Record High COVID-19 Numbers". Time. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved October 3, 2020.
  120. ^ Breuninger, Kevin (July 30, 2020). "Former GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain dies after battle with coronavirus". CNBC. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved October 3, 2020.
  121. ^ Baker, Peter; Haberman, Maggie (October 2, 2020). "Trump Tests Positive for the Coronavirus". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 2, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  122. ^ Dawsey, Josh; Itkowitz, Colby. "Trump says he and first lady have tested positive for coronavirus". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 2, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  123. ^ Mason, Jeff (October 2, 2020). "Trump starts "quarantine process" after aide Hope Hicks tests positive for coronavirus". Reuters. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  124. ^ Mason, Jeff; Alper, Alexandra; Holland, Steve (October 2, 2020). "Trump to be moved to hospital for treatment after COVID-19 diagnosis". West Central Tribune. Reuters. Archived from the original on October 2, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  125. ^ Dawsey, Josh; Parker, Ashley; Itkowitz, Colby. "Trump tests positive for coronavirus, plans to go to Walter Reed hospital, two officials say". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  126. ^ Loomes, Phoebe (October 2, 2020). "Donald Trump mocked Joe Biden for wearing a mask before testing positive". News.com.au. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  127. ^ Wilkie, Christina (October 2, 2020). "Democratic nominee Joe Biden tests negative for coronavirus after potential exposure, Trump's diagnosis". CNBC. Archived from the original on October 2, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  128. ^ a b Hook, Janet; Bierman, Noah (October 12, 2020). "Trump declares himself immune to COVID: 'I'll kiss everyone in that audience'". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on October 28, 2020. Retrieved October 29, 2020.
  129. ^ Siders, David; Mahtesian, Charlie (October 2, 2020). "This is the worst nightmare for the Trump campaign". Politico. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  130. ^ Bycoffe, Aaron; Groskopf, Christopher; Mehta, Dhrumil (October 2, 2020). "How Americans View The Coronavirus Crisis And Trump's Response". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved October 3, 2020.
  131. ^ O'Keefe, Ed; Erickson, Bo; Ewall-Wice, Sarah (October 2, 2020). "Biden campaign pulls ads attacking Trump for now, but plows ahead with schedule". CBS News. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved October 3, 2020.
  132. ^ Smith, David (October 2, 2020). "Trump's positive Covid test was a surprise that many saw coming". The Guardian. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved October 3, 2020.
  133. ^ Milligan, Susan (October 28, 2020). "Trump's Rallies Are Turning Voters Against Him". U.S. News & World Report. Archived from the original on October 29, 2020. Retrieved October 29, 2020.
  134. ^ Solender, Andrew (October 29, 2020). "Here's Why Massive Rallies May Do Trump More Harm Than Good". Forbes. Archived from the original on November 2, 2020. Retrieved October 29, 2020.
  135. ^ Sebenius, Alyza (June 24, 2019). "U.S. Sees Russia, China, Iran Trying to Influence 2020 Elections". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on October 6, 2019. Retrieved July 12, 2020.
  136. ^ Lucas, Fred (June 28, 2019). "2020 Election Meddling by China, Iran, N. Korea Likely, Administration Officials Warn". Yahoo! News. Archived from the original on October 6, 2019. Retrieved July 12, 2020.
  137. ^ "Trump campaign targeted by Iran-linked hackers". The Jerusalem Post. Reuters. October 4, 2019. Archived from the original on October 6, 2019.
  138. ^ Greene, Jay; Romm, Tony (October 4, 2019). "Iranians tried to hack U.S. presidential candidate in effort that targeted hundreds, Microsoft says". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 4, 2019.
  139. ^ "China, Caught Meddling in Past Two US Elections, Claims "Not Interested" in 2020 Vote". Voa News. April 30, 2020. Archived from the original on May 18, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  140. ^ Leopold, Jason; Bensinger, Ken (November 2, 2020). "New: Mueller Investigated Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, And Roger Stone For DNC Hacks And Election Law Violations". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  141. ^ Tucker, Eric (February 24, 2020). "FBI official: Russia wants to see US 'tear ourselves apart'". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on February 26, 2020. Retrieved February 26, 2020. One intelligence official said lawmakers were not told that Russia was working directly to aid Trump. But other people familiar with the meeting said they were told the Kremlin was looking to help Trump's candidacy. The people spoke on condition of anonymity to discussed [sic] the classified briefing.
  142. ^ Harris, Shane; et al. (February 21, 2020). "Bernie Sanders briefed by U.S. officials that Russia is trying to help his presidential campaign". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 22, 2020. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
  143. ^ Barnes, Julian E.; Ember, Sydney (February 21, 2020). "Russia Is Said to Be Interfering to Aid Sanders in Democratic Primaries". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 22, 2020. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
  144. ^ Goldman, Adam; Barnes, Julian E.; Haberman, Maggie; Fandos, Nicholas (February 20, 2020). "Lawmakers Are Warned That Russia Is Meddling to Support Trump". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 25, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
  145. ^ a b Phillips, Katherine (September 4, 2020). "Joe Biden says Russia, not China, is greatest threat to 2020 election". USA Today. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved September 11, 2020.
  146. ^ Rogin, Josh (October 30, 2020). "There's Chinese interference on both sides of the 2020 election". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  147. ^ Kirby, Jen (September 15, 2020). "Are China and Iran meddling in US elections? It's complicated". Vox. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
  148. ^ Nakashima, Ellen; Gardner, Amy; Stanley-Becker, Isaac; Timberg, Craig (October 22, 2020). "U.S. government concludes Iran was behind threatening emails sent to Democrats". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 29, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
  149. ^ Barnes, Julian E.; Sanger, David E. (October 21, 2020). "Iran and Russia Seek to Influence Election in Final Days, U.S. Officials Warn". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 26, 2020. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  150. ^ Bertrand, Natasha; Lippman, Daniel (October 28, 2020). "Ratcliffe went off script with Iran remarks, officials say". Politico. Archived from the original on October 29, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
  151. ^ "US indicts two Iranian hackers over 2020 election misinformation campaign". Stars and Stripes. Archived from the original on November 21, 2021. Retrieved November 21, 2021.
  152. ^ Padgett, Tim (September 22, 2020). "Is Colombia Interfering In The U.S. Election In Florida – With Tactics It Exported To Florida?". University of South Florida. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved October 27, 2020.
  153. ^ Meeks, Gregory; Gallego, Ruben (October 24, 2020). "Colombian politicians shouldn't take sides in US election". CNN. Archived from the original on October 27, 2020. Retrieved October 27, 2020.
  154. ^ Daniels, Joe Parkin (October 26, 2020). "US embassy warns Colombian politicians not to get involved in US elections". The Guardian. Archived from the original on October 27, 2020. Retrieved October 27, 2020.
  155. ^ "US probing whether Jho Low secretly made donation to Trump's 2020 re-election campaign". The Straits Times. March 14, 2019. Archived from the original on November 22, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  156. ^ Burroughs, Callum; Khan, Yusuf (December 20, 2018). "The bizarre story of 1MDB, the Goldman Sachs-backed Malaysian fund that turned into one of the biggest scandals in financial history". Business Insider. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  157. ^ Sanger, David E.; Perlroth, Nicole (October 12, 2020). "Microsoft Takes Down a Risk to the Election and Finds the U.S. Doing the Same: Fearing Russian ransomware attacks on the election, the company and U.S. Cyber Command mounted similar pre-emptive strikes. It is not clear how long they may work". US Politics. The New York Times (October 21, 2020 ed.). Archived from the original on November 4, 2020.
  158. ^ a b Krebs, Christopher Cox (November 29, 2020). "Fired director of U.S. cyber agency Chris Krebs explains why President Trump's claims of election interference are false". In Pelley, Scott Cameron (ed.). 60 Minutes. Season 53. Episode 13. Event occurs at 11:30. CBS. Archived from the original on December 2, 2020.
  159. ^ Smith, Ben (October 25, 2020). "Trump Had One Last Story to Sell. The Wall Street Journal Wouldn't Buy It". The Media Equation. The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020.
  160. ^ Bertrand, Natasha; Samuelsohn, Darren (June 21, 2019). "What if Trump won't accept 2020 defeat?". Politico. Archived from the original on July 26, 2020. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  161. ^ Gessen, Masha (July 21, 2020). "What could happen if Donald Trump rejects electoral defeat?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 31, 2020. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  162. ^ Ward, Jon (October 1, 2020). "Trump's false claims of rigged voting are "a perilous thing," says top Republican expert". Yahoo! News. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  163. ^ Rafferty, Andrew; Taintor, David (October 16, 2016). "Trump Won't Say He'll Accept Election Results: 'I Will Keep You In Suspense'". NBC News. Archived from the original on April 9, 2021. Retrieved June 18, 2021.
  164. ^ Beer, Tommy (September 24, 2020). "Here's Everything Trump Has Said About Refusing To Give Up Power". Forbes. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  165. ^ Lange, Jason (June 12, 2020). "Trump says he will "do other things" if he loses 2020 election". Reuters. Archived from the original on July 29, 2020. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  166. ^ Feuer, Will (July 19, 2020). "President Trump won't agree to accept 2020 election results as Biden leads in polls – 'I have to see'". CNBC. Archived from the original on July 28, 2020. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  167. ^ "Trump won't commit to peaceful transfer of power". BBC News. September 24, 2020. Archived from the original on September 27, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
  168. ^ Choi, Matthew (September 23, 2020). "Trump declines to commit to a peaceful transition of power after election". Politico. Archived from the original on September 29, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
  169. ^ Kiely, Eugene; Rieder, Rem (September 30, 2020). "Trump's Repeated False Attacks on Mail-In Ballots". FactCheck. Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  170. ^ Riccardi, Nicholas (September 30, 2020). "Here's the reality behind Trump's claims about mail voting". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  171. ^ Parks, Miles (August 28, 2020). "Ignoring FBI And Fellow Republicans, Trump Continues Assault On Mail-In Voting". NPR. Archived from the original on December 28, 2020. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  172. ^ Stimson, Brie (September 24, 2020). "Trump blasts ballots when asked about election aftermath: 'The ballots are a disaster'". Fox News. Archived from the original on October 24, 2020. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  173. ^ Levine, Marianne; Desiderio, Andrew; Everett, Burgess (September 24, 2020). "Republicans break with Trump over peaceful transition of power". Politico. Archived from the original on September 28, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
  174. ^ Cillizza, Chris (September 25, 2020). "The FBI director just totally shut down Donald Trump's vote-fraud conspiracy". CNN. Archived from the original on September 25, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  175. ^ Crowley, Michael (September 24, 2020). "2020 Election Live Updates: Trump Once Again Questions the Election, as Top Republicans Commit to a Peaceful Transfer of Power". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 27, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
  176. ^ Kane, Paul; Bade, Rachael; Itkowitz, Colby (September 24, 2020). "What Senate Republicans are saying after Trump refused to commit to an orderly transfer of power". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 28, 2020. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  177. ^ Multiple sources:
  178. ^ Sullivan, Kate (April 25, 2020). "Biden says he thinks Trump will try to delay the presidential election". CNN. Archived from the original on July 31, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
  179. ^ Choi, Matthew (April 23, 2020). "Biden predicts Trump will try to delay November election". Politico. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
  180. ^ Karni, Annie (May 12, 2020). "Kushner, Law Aside, Doesn't Rule Out Delaying 2020 Election". New York Times.
  181. ^ Shinkman, Paul D. (July 30, 2020). "Pompeo Reacts to Trump's Proposal to Delay November Election". US News & World Report.
  182. ^ Rascoe, Ayesha; Davis, Susan; Parks, Miles (July 30, 2020). "Trump Floats Delaying The Election. It Would Require A Change In Law". NPR. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
  183. ^ Jackson, David; Garrison, Joey; Fritze, John (July 30, 2020). "Trump floats delaying election over mail-in voting, legal experts say that power rests with Congress". USA Today. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved August 1, 2020.
  184. ^ Muller, Derek (April 29, 2020). "Trump Can't Postpone the Election". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
  185. ^ Koslof, Evan (July 30, 2020). "VERIFY: Nancy Pelosi won't become president on Jan. 20 if Congress delays federal elections". WUSA (TV). Archived from the original on July 31, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  186. ^ Forgey, Quint (July 30, 2020). "Trump refuses to back down on suggestion of election delay". Politico.
  187. ^ Haberman, Maggi (July 30, 2020). "Trump Floats an Election Delay, and Republicans Shoot It Down". New York Times.
  188. ^ Lazer, David; et al. (July 30, 2020), "Report#7: Update on Vote by Mail", COVID-19 Consortium for Understanding the Public's Policy Preferences Across States, State of the Nation: A 50-State COVID-19 Survey, archived from the original on November 3, 2020, retrieved November 8, 2020
  189. ^ "Coronavirus makes voting by mail even more important". USA Today. June 15, 2020. Archived from the original on August 16, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  190. ^ Love, Juliette; Stevens, Matt; Gamio, Lazaro (August 14, 2020). "A Record 76% of Americans Can Vote by Mail in 2020". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 16, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  191. ^ Broadwater, Luke; Fuchs, Hailey (July 14, 2020). "Postal Service says delays could affect multiple states' elections". Salt Lake City Tribune. Archived from the original on August 21, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020 – via The New York Times.
  192. ^ Katz, Eric (July 20, 2020). "Looking to Cut Costs, New USPS Leader Takes Aim at Overtime and Late Trips". Government Executive. Archived from the original on July 27, 2020. Retrieved July 27, 2020.
  193. ^ Gardner, Amy; Dawsey, Josh; Kane, Paul (August 13, 2020). "Trump opposes election aid for states and Postal Service bailout, threatening Nov. 3 vote". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 16, 2020.
  194. ^ Gordon, Aaron (August 13, 2020). "The Post Office Is Deactivating Mail Sorting Machines Ahead of the Election". Vice. Archived from the original on August 16, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  195. ^ Bogage, Jacob (August 18, 2020). "Postmaster general announces he is "suspending" policies that were blamed for causing mail delays". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 18, 2020. Retrieved August 18, 2020.
  196. ^ Sprunt, Barbara (August 13, 2020). "Trump Opposes Postal Service Funding But Says He'd Sign Bill Including It". NPR. Archived from the original on August 23, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  197. ^ Benen, Steve (April 8, 2020). "After voting by mail, Trump denounces voting by mail". MSNBC. Archived from the original on August 8, 2020. Retrieved August 15, 2020.
  198. ^ Bogage, Jacob (August 12, 2020). "Trump says Postal Service needs money for mail-in voting, but he'll keep blocking funding". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 23, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  199. ^ "Data Dive: The Growth of Early In-Person and Mail Voting". The Center for Election Innovation & Research. Archived from the original on September 21, 2024. Retrieved September 19, 2024.
  200. ^ "2020 General Election Early Vote Statistics". electproject.github.io. Archived from the original on January 17, 2021. Retrieved September 19, 2024.
  201. ^ a b Levine, Sam (August 21, 2020). "Trump campaign fails to show evidence of vote-by-mail fraud, filing reveals". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 14, 2020. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  202. ^ King, Lauren; Thorbecke, Catherine; Winsor, Morgan; Cathey, Libby; Stoddart, Michelle (November 3, 2020). "Election Day 2020 live updates: USPS misses deadline but will sweep for ballots". ABC News. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  203. ^ Bogage, Jacob; Ingraham, Christopher (November 3, 2020). "USPS data shows thousands of mailed ballots missed Election Day deadlines". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 10, 2021. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  204. ^ Severns, Maggie (August 26, 2019). "FEC paralyzed by resignations as 2020 approaches". Politico. Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved August 19, 2020.
  205. ^ Lee, Michelle Ye Hee (May 19, 2020). "Senate confirms appointee to Federal Election Commission, restoring panel's voting quorum". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  206. ^ Frostenson, Sarah; Levinthal, Dave (September 4, 2020). "What Happens When The FEC Can't Do Its Job?". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on September 14, 2019. Retrieved November 2, 2020.
  207. ^ Foran, Clare; Raju, Manu; Barrett, Ted (September 19, 2020). "McConnell vows Trump's nominee to replace Ginsburg will get Senate vote, setting up historic fight". CNN. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
  208. ^ Schneider, Elena (September 19, 2020). "Dem donors smash ActBlue's daily record after Ginsburg's death". Politico. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
  209. ^ Kumar, Anita (September 19, 2020). "'We're going to fill the seat': Supreme Court vacancy provides Trump new rallying cry". Politico. Archived from the original on September 20, 2020. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
  210. ^ Garrison, David Jackson and Joey. "Trump says he wants to fill Supreme Court seat quickly in case justices need to settle election dispute". USA Today. Archived from the original on September 28, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  211. ^ Quinn, Melissa (September 21, 2020). "Pence says Trump has an "obligation" to quickly name Supreme Court nominee". CBS News. Archived from the original on October 7, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  212. ^ Bowden, John (September 24, 2020). "Graham vows GOP will accept election results after Trump comments". The Hill. Archived from the original on October 28, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  213. ^ Swanson, Ian (September 25, 2020). "Trump dumbfounds GOP with latest unforced error". The Hill. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  214. ^ Kim, Seung Min; Itkowitz, Colby (September 26, 2020). "Trump announces Judge Amy Coney Barrett is his pick for the Supreme Court". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 3, 2020. Retrieved October 3, 2020.
  215. ^ Wise, Alana; Naylor, Brian (October 22, 2020). "Amy Coney Barrett Moves A Step Closer To Confirmation After Judiciary Committee Vote". NPR. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  216. ^ a b Macaro, Lisa (October 26, 2020). "Barrett confirmed as Supreme Court justice in partisan vote". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on January 9, 2021. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  217. ^ Pecorin, Allison; Turner, Trish (October 22, 2020). "Senate Republicans move Barrett Supreme Court nomination toward final vote". ABC News. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  218. ^ Wise, Alana (October 22, 2020). "Amy Coney Barrett Moves A Step Closer To Confirmation After Judiciary Committee Vote". NPR. Archived from the original on October 24, 2020. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  219. ^ a b Gringlas, Sam; Cornish, Audie; Dorning, Courtney (September 22, 2020). "Step Aside Election 2000: This Year's Election May Be The Most Litigated Yet". NPR. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  220. ^ Sherman, Mark (October 22, 2020). "Democrats: Justices' 4–4 tie in election case ominous sign". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  221. ^ Atwater, Malaysia (October 21, 2020). "COVID-19 complicates voting, drives emergency stay applications, say SCOTUS clinic directors". The Stanford Daily. Archived from the original on October 28, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  222. ^ Abramson, Alaan (October 22, 2020). "'A Litigation Arms Race.' Why The 2020 Election Could Come Down To The Courts". Time. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  223. ^ Graff, Garrett M. (October 23, 2020). "A Day-By-Day Guide to What Could Happen If This Election Goes Bad". Politico. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  224. ^ Goldmacher, Shane (October 11, 2019). "2020 Presidential Debate Schedule Announced for General Election". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 11, 2019. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  225. ^ a b McCammond, Alexi (July 27, 2020). "First presidential debate moved from Notre Dame to Cleveland". Axios. Archived from the original on July 29, 2020. Retrieved July 27, 2020.
  226. ^ Parrott, Jeff (June 24, 2020). "After Michigan pulls out, Notre Dame won't say if it still plans to host Trump-Biden debate". South Bend Tribune. Archived from the original on July 11, 2020. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  227. ^ Siders, David (September 29, 2020). "Trump mayhem takes over first debate". Politico. Archived from the original on September 30, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
  228. ^ Agiesta, Jennifer (September 30, 2020). "Post-debate CNN poll: Six in 10 say Biden won the debate". CNN. Archived from the original on September 30, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
  229. ^ Prokop, Andrew (September 30, 2020). "The first post-debate polls say Biden won". Vox. Archived from the original on September 30, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
  230. ^ Schoen, Doug (September 30, 2020). "Doug Schoen: First Presidential Debate – Here's who won on style and substance". Fox News. Archived from the original on September 30, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
  231. ^ Lynch, Suzanne; Dooley, Chris; McRedmond, Finn; Cullen, Damian; McKechnie, David (September 30, 2020). "US presidential debate: who won, was it any good, were there any surprises?". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on October 28, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
  232. ^ McCammon, Sarah (September 30, 2020). "From Debate Stage, Trump Declines To Denounce White Supremacy". NPR. Archived from the original on September 30, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
  233. ^ Pereira, Ivan (September 30, 2020). "Trump doesn't denounce white supremacists and militias during debate". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 30, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
  234. ^ MacGuill, Dan (September 30, 2020). "Did Trump "Refuse to Condemn" White Supremacists at Debate?". Snopes. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  235. ^ Zurcher, Anthony (October 1, 2020). "Trump now tells far right to "stand down" amid white supremacy row". BBC News. Archived from the original on September 30, 2020. Retrieved October 1, 2020.
  236. ^ Flatley, Daniel; Litvan, Laura; Jacobs, Jennifer (September 30, 2020). "Trump now claims he's unfamiliar with Proud Boys, says they should 'stand down'". National Post. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved October 1, 2020 – via Bloomberg News.
  237. ^ Grynbaum, Michael M. (September 30, 2020). "The Commission on Presidential Debates says it will change debate format, however, no decision yet on cutting off microphones". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 30, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2020.
  238. ^ Montellaro, Zach; Shepard, Steven (October 11, 2019). "General-election debate schedule revealed for 2020". Politico. Archived from the original on December 28, 2019. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  239. ^ Agiesta, Jennifer (October 8, 2020). "Post-debate CNN poll: Harris seen as winner in a contest that matched expectations". CNN. Archived from the original on October 8, 2020. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
  240. ^ Allen, Nick (October 8, 2020). "Analysis: Mike Pence vs Kamala Harris – who won the vice-presidential debate?". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on October 8, 2020. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
  241. ^ Epstein, Reid J. (October 7, 2020). "A fly sat atop Mike Pence's head for two minutes during the V.P. debate". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 25, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  242. ^ "Fly lands on Mike Pence's head during US election vice-presidential debate". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. October 8, 2020. Archived from the original on October 28, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  243. ^ Jesse, David (June 23, 2020). "University of Michigan confirms it won't host presidential debate. Here's why". Detroit Free Press. Archived from the original on December 18, 2020. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  244. ^ Wilkie, Christina (October 8, 2020). "Trump refuses to participate in virtual debate on Oct. 15: 'I'm not going to waste my time'". CNBC. Archived from the original on October 8, 2020. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
  245. ^ Merica, Dan; Bohn, Kevin (October 9, 2020). "Commission cancels second debate between Trump and Biden". CNN. Archived from the original on October 10, 2020. Retrieved October 10, 2020.
  246. ^ Stracquarlursi, Veronica (June 23, 2020). "Second presidential debate moved to Miami after original host pulls out due to coronavirus concerns". CNN. Archived from the original on July 25, 2020. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
  247. ^ Tamburin, Adam (October 11, 2019). "Belmont University awarded final 2020 presidential debate". The Tennessean. Archived from the original on October 12, 2019. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  248. ^ Hudak, John (October 23, 2020). "The debate mute button was a gift to President Trump and all Americans". Brookings. Retrieved May 23, 2023.
  249. ^ Elliot, Phillip; Abramson, Alan; Vesoulis, Abby (October 22, 2020). "The Biggest Moments in the Final Presidential Debate". Time. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  250. ^ Poniewozik, James (October 23, 2020). "Moderation Returns to Politics. Or at Least to the Debate". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved November 9, 2020.
  251. ^ Bennet, John; Boyle, Louise; Baxter, Holly; Gray, Lucy; Connolly, Griffin (October 23, 2020). "Who won the presidential debate?". The Independent. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  252. ^ Agiesta, Jennifer (October 23, 2020). "CNN Poll: Biden wins final presidential debate". CNN. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  253. ^ Harris, John F. (October 23, 2020). "This Was a Pretty Good Debate. Who Cares?". Politico. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  254. ^ Stelter, Brian (September 30, 2020). "Trump-Biden clash was watched by at least 73 million viewers". CNN. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  255. ^ Koblin, John (October 8, 2020). "Pence-Harris Debate Is No. 2 in Vice-Presidential Ratings, With 58 Million TV Viewers". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  256. ^ Reston, Maeve (October 16, 2020). "Stark contrast between Trump and Biden on display in dueling town halls". CNN. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved October 23, 2020.
  257. ^ Thorne, Will (October 23, 2020). "TV Ratings: Final Trump-Biden Debate Down 10 Million Viewers From First". Variety. Archived from the original on October 26, 2020. Retrieved October 27, 2020.
  258. ^ Tobin, Christina (2020). "Second Open Presidential Debate 2020". Free and Equal Elections Foundation. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020. Retrieved October 9, 2020.
  259. ^ "Third Open Presidential Debate 2020". Free and Equal Elections Foundation. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 25, 2020.
  260. ^ 270 to Win
  261. ^ RealClear Politics
  262. ^ FiveThirtyEight
  263. ^ 270 to Win
  264. ^ RealClear Politics
  265. ^ "2020 Electoral College Ratings" (PDF). The Cook Political Report. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 28, 2020. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
  266. ^ "Presidential Ratings". Inside Elections. April 3, 2020. Archived from the original on May 27, 2020. Retrieved April 14, 2020.
  267. ^ "2020 President". Sabato's Crystal Ball. July 14, 2020. Archived from the original on April 4, 2020. Retrieved July 14, 2020.
  268. ^ Shepard, Steven; et al. (November 19, 2019). "2020 Election Forecast". Politico. Archived from the original on June 14, 2020. Retrieved November 19, 2019.
  269. ^ "Battle for White House". RealClearPolitics. April 19, 2019. Archived from the original on May 3, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  270. ^ "CNN's final 2020 Electoral College outlook: A remarkably stable race comes to an end". CNN. November 2, 2020. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  271. ^ "Forecasting the US elections". The Economist. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  272. ^ "2020 Election Battleground Tracker". CBS News. July 12, 2020. Archived from the original on July 12, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  273. ^ "2020 Presidential Election Interactive Map". 270 to Win. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  274. ^ "ABC News Race Ratings". ABC News. July 24, 2020. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  275. ^ Montanaro, Domenico (October 30, 2020). "Final NPR Electoral Map: Biden Has The Edge, But Trump Retains Narrow Path". NPR. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  276. ^ Todd, Chuck; Murray, Mark; Dann, Carrie; Holzberg, Melissa (October 27, 2020). "Biden continues to lead in our latest battleground map". NBC News. Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on October 27, 2020. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
  277. ^ "2020 Presidential Election Model". Øptimus Consulting. Decision Desk HQ. November 3, 2020. Archived from the original on August 1, 2022. Retrieved July 31, 2022.
  278. ^ "2020 Election Forecast". FiveThirtyEight. 2020. Archived from the original on September 11, 2020. Retrieved November 2, 2020.
  279. ^ "2020 election to cost $14 billion, blowing away spending records". OpenSecrets. October 28, 2020. Archived from the original on January 22, 2021. Retrieved May 27, 2021.
  280. ^ Victor, Daniel; Serviss, Lew; Paybarah, Azi (October 2, 2020). "In His Own Words, Trump on the Coronavirus and Masks". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 2, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  281. ^ Restuccia, Andrew (October 2, 2020). "Trump and His Aides Have Long Played Down Importance of Face Masks, Distancing". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
  282. ^ Mills, Doug; Schaff, Erin (October 29, 2020). "As Trump Exaggerates Virus Progress and Mocks Masks, Biden Vows to 'Let Science Drive Our Decisions'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
  283. ^ Vigdor, Neil (August 26, 2020). "Masks and social distancing are mostly absent from Republican convention events". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 7, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
  284. ^ a b Moore, Elena (October 16, 2020). "Trump's And Biden's Plans On The Coronavirus Pandemic". NPR. Archived from the original on November 2, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  285. ^ Welna, David (March 18, 2020). "Trump Invokes A Cold War Relic, The Defense Production Act, For Coronavirus Shortages". NPR. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  286. ^ "In Tamer Debate, Trump and Biden Clash (Again) on President's Pandemic Response". Kaiser Health News. October 23, 2020. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  287. ^ Politi, James; Weaver, Courtney (October 9, 2020). "Trump and Biden spar over state of economy in final days of race". Financial Times. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  288. ^ Pager, Tyler (June 8, 2020). "Biden Says Trump Squandered Economic Expansion Begun With Obama". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on November 2, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  289. ^ Crawford, Shannon K. (September 29, 2020). "Trump vs. Biden on the issues: Economy". ABC News. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  290. ^ Helier, Cheung (January 23, 2020). "What does Trump actually believe on climate change?". BBC News. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  291. ^ McKeever, Amy (October 28, 2020). "Latest: Trump's and Biden's environmental policy promises and actions". Science. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  292. ^ Kerns, Christopher (April 9, 2020). "It's (nearly) official: Biden vs. Trump. Here's our take". Advisory Board. Archived from the original on July 28, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  293. ^ a b Mosk, Matthew; Faulders, Katherine (June 8, 2020). "Trump's quest to "dominate" amid George Floyd protests sparks new concerns about presidential powers". ABC News. Archived from the original on October 1, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  294. ^ Moore, Elena (October 16, 2020). "Trump's And Biden's Plans For Health Care". NPR. Archived from the original on November 2, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  295. ^ Stolberg, Sheryl Gay (September 24, 2020). "Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Strike Down Affordable Care Act". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  296. ^ Healy, Jack; Searcey, Dionne (June 4, 2020). "Two Crises Convulse a Nation: A Pandemic and Police Violence". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  297. ^ Chenoweth, Erica; Pressman, Jeremy (October 16, 2021). "This summer's Black Lives Matter protesters were overwhelmingly peaceful, our research finds". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 25, 2021. Retrieved March 9, 2021. The overall levels of violence and property destruction were low, and most of the violence that did take place was, in fact, directed against the BLM protesters. [...] In short, our data suggest that 96.3 percent of events involved no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7 percent of events, no injuries were reported among participants, bystanders or police.
  298. ^ "Vandalism, looting after Floyd's death sparks at least $1 billion in damages:report". The Hill. September 17, 2020. Archived from the original on December 12, 2020. Retrieved October 9, 2020.
  299. ^ Kingson, Jennifer A. (September 16, 2020). "Exclusive: $1 billion-plus riot damage is most expensive in insurance history". Axios. Archived from the original on December 13, 2020. Retrieved October 10, 2020.
  300. ^ Horton, Jake (September 2, 2020). "Does Trump have the right to send in federal forces?". BBC News. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  301. ^ Routh, Julian (September 8, 2020). "Trump calls protesters who confronted Pittsburgh diners 'Thugs!'". Post Gazette.
  302. ^ Cohen, Max (July 1, 2020). "Trump: Black Lives Matter is a 'symbol of hate'". Politico.
  303. ^ Detrow, Scott; Sprunt, Barbara (June 2, 2020). "'He Thinks Division Helps Him': Biden Condemns Trump's Protest Response". NPR. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  304. ^ "2020 National Popular Vote Tracker". The Cook Political Report. Archived from the original on January 13, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  305. ^ Garrison, Joey (November 3, 2020). "Voter turnout 2020: Early voting tops 100 million ballots cast". USA Today. Archived from the original on January 7, 2021. Retrieved November 29, 2020.
  306. ^ Schaul, Kevin; Rabinowitz, Kate; Mellnik, Ted (November 30, 2020). "2020 turnout is the highest in over a century". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 10, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  307. ^ Park, Andrea (November 5, 2020). "2020 Voter Turnout Was the Highest the U.S. Has Seen in Over a Century". Marie Claire. Archived from the original on January 7, 2021. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  308. ^ Chinni, Dante (December 6, 2020). "Are close presidential elections the new normal?". NBC News. Archived from the original on December 20, 2020. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  309. ^ Williams, Norman R. (2012). "Why the National Popular Vote Compact is Unconstitutional". BYU Law Review. 2012 (5). J. Reuben Clark Law School: 1539–1570. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved October 14, 2020.
  310. ^ Bishop, Bill (December 17, 2020). "For Most Americans, the Local Presidential Vote Was a Landslide". Daily Yonder. Archived from the original on August 4, 2021. Retrieved August 3, 2021.
  311. ^ Wasserman, David (March 8, 2017). "Purple America Has All But Disappeared". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved December 28, 2017.
  312. ^ Haltiwanger, John (November 7, 2020). "Trump is the first president in nearly 3 decades to lose a reelection". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 9, 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  313. ^ Herndon, Astead W. (November 14, 2020). "Biden Asked Republicans to Give Him a Chance. They're Not Interested". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 14, 2020.
  314. ^ Hohmann, James (November 11, 2020). "The Daily 202: Biden won with the weakest coattails in 60 years. That could make him dependent on GOP senators". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 15, 2020. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  315. ^ Azari, Julia (August 20, 2020). "Biden Had To Fight For The Presidential Nomination. But Most VPs Have To". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved August 25, 2020.
  316. ^ Enten, Harry (January 10, 2021). "How Trump led Republicans to historic losses". CNN. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved February 3, 2021.
  317. ^ Silverstein, Jason (November 13, 2020). "2020 election ends at same electoral vote as 2016 – 306 to 232, with Trump losing this time". CBS News. Archived from the original on January 11, 2021. Retrieved November 29, 2020.
  318. ^ "Bellwether no more? Ohio misses presidential pick for first time since 1960". Cincinnati Enquirer. November 8, 2020. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  319. ^ "Biden Voters Rebuild a "Blue Wall" That Trump Smashed". The New York Times. January 20, 2021. Archived from the original on May 5, 2022. Retrieved May 5, 2022.
  320. ^ "NBC News Exit Poll: How Biden rebuilt the Democrats' "blue wall"". NBCNews.com. November 7, 2020. Retrieved May 5, 2022.
  321. ^ Taris, Jamie (November 18, 2020). "Race to 270: Rebuilding the "Blue Wall" proved key in Biden's win". The Suffolk Journal. Boston. Archived from the original on June 16, 2021. Retrieved May 5, 2022.
  322. ^ "Joe Biden wins Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, takes back blue wall". Freep.com. Archived from the original on December 2, 2021. Retrieved May 5, 2022.
  323. ^ Mejía, Elena; Skelley, Geoffrey (December 8, 2020). "How The 2020 Election Changed The Electoral Map | FiveThirtyEight". Projects.fivethirtyeight.com. Archived from the original on April 14, 2022. Retrieved May 7, 2022.
  324. ^ Chinni, Dante (November 15, 2020). "Vote in 2020 shows changing battleground map". NBCNews.com. Retrieved May 7, 2022.
  325. ^ a b Coleman, J. Miles (November 19, 2020). "Wisconsin: Decisive Again In 2020". Center For Politics. Retrieved December 9, 2020.
  326. ^ a b Skelley, Geoffrey (January 19, 2021). "Even Though Biden Won, Republicans Enjoyed The Largest Electoral College Edge In 70 Years. Will That Last?". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved June 5, 2021. We can see just how large this advantage was if we average the margins in the two "tipping-point" states of Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, or the states that delivered (or would have delivered) the decisive 270th electoral vote Biden and Trump needed to win, respectively. (Biden's tipping-point state was Wisconsin, while Trump's would have been Pennsylvania, provided he also won Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin.)
  327. ^ Paz, Ana Lucía González; Blight, Garry; Levine, Sam (September 3, 2024). "Can 0.03% of US votes really swing the presidential election?". The Guardian. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
  328. ^ Lozada, Carlos (February 28, 2021). "Joe Biden won the presidency by making the most of his lucky breaks". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 4, 2021.
  329. ^ McCormick, John (November 13, 2020). "Bellwether Counties Nearly Wiped Out by 2020 Election". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  330. ^ a b c d "Rural America is not all Trump country: A closer look at the rural counties that Biden won". Economic Innovation Group. November 17, 2020. Retrieved July 18, 2021.
  331. ^ Maks, Patrick (November 8, 2020). "Calling the 2020 presidential race state by state". Associated Press. Archived from the original on November 10, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2024.
  332. ^ Wagner, Meg; et al. (November 7, 2020). "Joe Biden elected president". CNN. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
  333. ^ Cathey, Libby. "Joe Biden apparent winner of presidency". ABC News. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
  334. ^ Steinhauser, Paul; Singman, Brooke (November 7, 2020). "Biden wins presidency, Trump denied second term in White House, Fox News projects". Fox NewsFox News. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
  335. ^ Lemire, Jonathan; Miller, Zeke; Weissert, Will (November 8, 2020). "Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided US". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
  336. ^ Edelman, Adam (November 7, 2020). "Biden defeats Trump to win White House, NBC News projects". NBC News.
  337. ^ Becket, Stefan; et al. (November 7, 2020). "Biden wins White House after taking Pennsylvania". CBS News.
  338. ^ Nagourney, Adam (November 8, 2020). "Five Takeaways From President-Elect Biden's Victory Speech". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  339. ^ a b c d Rahman, Rema (November 3, 2020). "Election observers on the ground in the US". The Hill. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
  340. ^ a b c "Election observer says no evidence for Trump's fraud claims". Associated Press News. November 5, 2020. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
  341. ^ a b c d Morello, Carol (November 4, 2020). "European election observers decry Trump's "baseless allegations" of voter fraud". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
  342. ^ "United States of America, General Elections, 3 November 2020: Interim Report" (PDF). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. October 22, 2020. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
  343. ^ "United States of America, General Elections, 3 November 2020: Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions" (PDF). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. November 4, 2020. p. 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
  344. ^ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GENERAL ELECTIONS 3 November 2020: ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report (PDF) (Report). OSCE and Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). February 9, 2021.
  345. ^ "Maine Official Election Results". Maine Secretary of State. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
  346. ^ Official Report of the Nebraska Board of State Canvassers, General Election, November 3, 2020, Nebraska Secretary of State.
  347. ^ Downing, Suzanne (September 1, 2020). "Green Party of Alaska nominates Jesse Ventura for president". Must Read Alaska. Retrieved December 1, 2020.
  348. ^ Certified Summary Results Report, Bexar County, Texas.
  349. ^ "Write-in Letter.pdf". Google Docs. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
  350. ^ "Title 21-A, § 802: Representation". legislature.maine.gov. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
  351. ^ "Nebraska Legislature". nebraskalegislature.gov. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
  352. ^ "2020 Presidential Election Statistics". uselectionatlas.org. Retrieved January 30, 2021.
  353. ^ "Statewide Precinct Detail" (PDF). State of Hawaii Office of Elections. State of Hawaii. January 19, 2020. p. 155. Retrieved January 30, 2021.
  354. ^ Andre, Michael; et al. (November 3, 2020). "National Exit Polls: How Different Groups Voted". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  355. ^ "National Results 2020 President exit polls". CNN. Retrieved December 4, 2020.
  356. ^ a b c d Frey, William H. (November 5, 2020). "Exit polls show both familiar and new voting blocs sealed Biden's win". The Brookings Institution. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  357. ^ "What Happened in 2020 National Analysis". Catalist. Retrieved May 17, 2021.
  358. ^ Cohn, Nate (May 14, 2021). "Tweet by Nate Cohn".
  359. ^ Gorden, Max (November 9, 2020). "Latino key to turning Arizona blue in 2020 presidential election, group says". AZFamily. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  360. ^ Aguilera, Jasmine (November 10, 2020). "The Complexities of the 2020 "Latino Vote" Were Overlooked, Again". Time. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  361. ^ Strott, Savannah; Mueller, Tabitha (November 16, 2020). "Polls show how Latino voters helped drive Biden win in Nevada, though Trump gained ground since 2016". The Nevada Independent. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  362. ^ Mazzei, Patricia; Perlroth, Nicole (November 4, 2020). "False News Targeting Latinos Trails the Election". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020.
  363. ^ Yee, Amy (October 22, 2020). "Latinos the targets of election disinformation – but activists are fighting back". The Guardian.
  364. ^ Sanz, Catherine (November 21, 2020). "Misinformation targeted Latino voters in the 2020 election". ABC News.
  365. ^ "American Election Eve Poll 2020". The American Election Eve Poll. November 2, 2020. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  366. ^ Andre, Michael; et al. (November 3, 2020). "New Mexico Voter Surveys: How Different Groups Voted". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  367. ^ Andre, Michael; et al. (November 3, 2020). "Florida Voter Surveys: How Different Groups Voted". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  368. ^ a b "National Exit Polls: How Different Groups Voted". The New York Times. January 5, 2021. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 24, 2021.
  369. ^ Stafford, Kat; Morrison, Aaron; Kastanis, Angeleki (November 9, 2020). "'This is proof': Biden's win reveals power of Black voters". Associated Press News. Retrieved November 22, 2020. [The] African American community stood up again for me.
  370. ^ "President Exit Polls". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 24, 2021.
  371. ^ Huang, Jon; Jacoby, Samuel; Strickland, Michael; Lai, K. K. Rebecca (November 8, 2016). "Election 2016: Exit Polls (Published 2016)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 24, 2021.
  372. ^ a b Mehta, Dhrumil (September 18, 2020). "How Asian Americans Are Thinking About The 2020 Election". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved January 27, 2021.
  373. ^ Nguyen, Terry (October 30, 2020). "48% of Vietnamese Americans say they're voting for Trump. Here's why". Vox. Retrieved January 29, 2021.
  374. ^ Zhou, Li (November 14, 2020). "What we know about who Asian American voters supported in the election". Vox. Retrieved November 22, 2020. With strong turnout this year and more voters joining the electorate, it's evident that AAPI voters are a key base that can't be neglected. The upcoming races in Georgia, too, are yet another opportunity for such outreach.
  375. ^ Desai, Suyash (September 26, 2019). "Donald Trump endorsement: India's calculated move". Deccan Herald. DH. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
  376. ^ "US election result 2020: Hindu Sena performs "havan", "puja" for Donald Trump's victory". Business Today. BT. November 4, 2020. Retrieved January 9, 2021.
  377. ^ "SURVEY: Indian Country overwhelmingly supports Joe Biden". Native News Online. October 21, 2020. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  378. ^ Caldera, Camille (November 12, 2020). "Fact check: There was strong Navajo support for Biden, but numbers cited in claim have changed". USA Today. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  379. ^ Segers, Grace (November 20, 2020). "Native American voters critical to Biden's success in Arizona". CBS News. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  380. ^ Fonseca, Felicia; Kastanis, Angeliki (November 19, 2020). "Native American votes helped secure Biden's win in Arizona". Associated Press News. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  381. ^ a b Smith, Anna V. (November 6, 2020). "How Indigenous voters swung the 2020 election". High Country News. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  382. ^ a b Fordham, Evie (November 6, 2020). "Trump investment in North Carolina's Native American Lumbee Tribe pays off". Fox News. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  383. ^ a b c Leonhardt, David (November 12, 2020). "'A Black Eye': Why Political Polling Missed the Mark. Again". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved November 29, 2020.
  384. ^ a b Edwards-Levy, Ariel (May 13, 2021). "Here's what pollsters think happened with 2020 election surveys". CNN. Retrieved May 13, 2021.
  385. ^ Matthews, Dylan (November 10, 2020). "One pollster's explanation for why the polls got it wrong". Vox. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  386. ^ Walker, Ben (November 5, 2020). "How accurate were the US presidential election polls?". New Statesman. Retrieved November 29, 2020.
  387. ^ Silver, Nate (November 11, 2020). "The Polls Weren't Great. But That's Pretty Normal". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  388. ^ Edelman, Gilad (August 22, 2024). "The Asterisk on Kamala Harris's Poll Numbers". The Atlantic. Retrieved September 29, 2024.
  389. ^ O'Donnell, Noreen (November 4, 2020). "As Ballots Are Counted, No Clear Winner on Election Night". NBC Bay Area. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.
  390. ^ Norden, Lawrence; Tisler, Derek. "Why Does It Take So Long to Count Mail Ballots in Key States? Blame Legislatures". Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  391. ^ DeSilver, Drew (November 10, 2020). "Most mail and provisional ballots got counted in past U.S. elections – but many did not". Pew Research Center. Retrieved March 5, 2024.
  392. ^ Leary, Alex (November 4, 2020). "Trump's Florida Election Win Hinged on Big Gains in Miami-Dade". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  393. ^ Sullivan, Sean (November 4, 2020). "Biden says he is confident of victory but asks supporters to have patience as votes are counted". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.
  394. ^ Goldmacher, Shane; Nagourney, Adam (November 4, 2020). "Biden and Trump Are Locked in Tight Race as Uncounted Votes Remain". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.
  395. ^ Wilkie, Christina (November 4, 2020). "Trump tries to claim victory even as ballots are being counted in several states – NBC has not made a call". CNBC. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.
  396. ^ Burns, Alexander; Martin, Jonathan (November 4, 2020). "As America Awaits a Winner, Trump Falsely Claims He Prevailed". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.
  397. ^ "Joe Biden's Campaign Denounces Trump's Bid to Shut Down Counting". Al Bawaba. November 4, 2020. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.
  398. ^ Slodyosko, Brian (November 5, 2020). "Explainer: States still in play and what makes them that way". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  399. ^ Slodyosko, Brian (November 4, 2020). "Explainer: Why AP called Arizona for Biden". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  400. ^ Karni, Annie; Haberman, Maggie (November 4, 2020). "Fox's Arizona Call for Biden Flipped the Mood at Trump Headquarters". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  401. ^ Romero, Simon (November 4, 2020). "With Arizona too close to call, Trump supporters gather at a vote-counting site in Phoenix". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  402. ^ Izadi, Elahe (November 4, 2020). "Who won Arizona? Why the call differs by media organization". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  403. ^ a b Lemire, Jonathan; Miller, Zeke; Colvin, Jill; Jaffe, Alexandra (November 4, 2020). "Biden wins Michigan, Wisconsin, now on brink of White House". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  404. ^ Andre, Michael; et al. (November 5, 2020). "Nevada Presidential Election Results". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  405. ^ Andre, Michael; et al. (November 5, 2020). "Arizona Presidential Election Results". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  406. ^ "WATCH: Fox News editor says early indications of Trump victory a 'red mirage'". PBS NewsHour. June 13, 2022. Retrieved May 9, 2023.
  407. ^ Wasserman, David (November 3, 2020). "Beware the "blue mirage" and the "red mirage" on election night". NBC News.
  408. ^ Blake, Aaron (November 5, 2020). "Trump blames Democrats for late-counted mail ballots. He should blame the GOP". The Washington Post.
  409. ^ Herndon, Astead (November 15, 2020). "Biden asked Republicans to give him a chance. They're not interested". The New York Times – via Gulf News.
  410. ^ Shubber, Kadhim (November 6, 2020). "Trump Pennsylvania litigation getting tepid response from federal judge". Financial Times. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
  411. ^ Schrade, Brad (November 6, 2020). "Georgia judge dismisses Trump campaign case in Chatham ballot dispute". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
  412. ^ Egan, Paul (November 5, 2020). "Judge throws out Trump lawsuit over counting of Michigan ballots". Detroit Free Press. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
  413. ^ Herb, Jeremy; Polantz, Katelyn (November 7, 2020). "'Democracy plain and simple': How the 2020 election defied fraud claims and pandemic fears". CNN. Retrieved November 9, 2020.
  414. ^ Martin, Jonathan; Glueck, Katie (November 5, 2020). "Biden Pulls Ahead in Key States as Anxious Nation Awaits Winner". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
  415. ^ Montellaro, Zach (November 6, 2020). "Georgia heading to recount, top election official says". Politico. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
  416. ^ Gerstein, Josh (November 6, 2020). "Pennsylvania Republicans win Supreme Court order to enforce separation of late-arriving ballots". Politico. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  417. ^ Montellaro, Zach (November 9, 2020). "GOP-led states back Trump's legal drive to challenge election". Politico. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  418. ^ Multiple sources:
  419. ^ Liptak, Kevin; et al. (November 8, 2020). "Inside Trump's loss: A culmination of self-destructive decisions". CNN. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  420. ^ a b Rucker, Philip; et al. (November 28, 2020). "20 days of fantasy and failure: Inside Trump's quest to overturn the election". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 6, 2020. Retrieved December 7, 2020.
  421. ^ Viebeck, Elise; Brown, Emma; Helderman, Rosalind S. (December 4, 2020). "Judges turn back claims by Trump and his allies in six states as the president's legal effort founders". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 7, 2020. Retrieved December 7, 2020.
  422. ^ Rucker, Philip; Gardner, Amy; Dawsey, Josh (November 20, 2020). "Trump uses power of presidency to try to overturn the election and stay in office". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 7, 2020. Retrieved December 7, 2020.
  423. ^ Martina, Michael; Freifeld, Karen; Renshaw, Jarrett (November 19, 2020). "Trump's election power play: Persuade Republican legislators to do what U.S. voters did not". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 8, 2020. Retrieved December 8, 2020.
  424. ^ Knowles, David (November 21, 2020). "Michigan lawmakers pledge to "follow the law" on picking electors after meeting with Trump". Yahoo! News. Archived from the original on August 23, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2020.
  425. ^ a b Bellisle, Martha; Geller, Adam (November 6, 2020). "More than a dozen arrested as protesters demand vote count". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  426. ^ Beaumont, Peter (November 5, 2020). "Trump supporters protest at Arizona vote counting centre". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  427. ^ @realDonaldTrump (November 7, 2020). "I Won This Election, By a Lot!" (Tweet). Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020 – via Twitter.
  428. ^ Baker, Peter; Haberman, Maggie (November 7, 2020). "In Torrent of Falsehoods, Trump Claims Election Is Being Stolen". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2020.
  429. ^ Yourish, Karen; Smart, Charlie (May 24, 2024). "Trump's Pattern of Sowing Election Doubt Intensifies in 2024". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 24, 2024.
  430. ^ Seitz, Amanda; Klepper, David; Ortutay, Barbara (November 10, 2020). "False claims of voting fraud, pushed by Trump, thrive online". Associated Press News. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  431. ^ Kessler, Glenn; Rizzo, Salvador (November 6, 2020). "President Trump's false claims of vote fraud: A chronology". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  432. ^ Wise, Alana (November 17, 2020). "Trump Fires Election Security Director Who Corrected Voter Fraud Disinformation". NPR.
  433. ^ Dale, Daniel (November 5, 2020). "Fact check: Trump delivers most dishonest speech of his presidency as Biden closes in on victory". CNN.
  434. ^ Boehm, Eric (November 5, 2020). "Trump Says Mail-in Votes Are Suspicious Because They Overwhelmingly Favor Joe Biden. He's Wrong". Reason. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  435. ^ Wasserman, Dave (November 4, 2020). "Beware the "blue mirage" and the "red mirage" on election night". NBC News. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  436. ^ "Full transcript: Trump's audio call with Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffesperger". CNN. January 3, 2021. Retrieved December 27, 2021.
  437. ^ "Watch live: Trump holds rally in Georgia ahead of Senate runoffs". The Hill. January 5, 2021. Retrieved December 27, 2021.
  438. ^ "Update: Fulton County ballot scanning issue affected just 342 votes". WSBTV. November 7, 2020. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  439. ^ Iati, Marisa; Usero, Adriana (November 5, 2020). "A viral video implied a man was illegally moving ballots. It was a photographer and his equipment". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  440. ^ O'Rourke, Clara (November 6, 2020). "Pennsylvania poll worker was copying information from a damaged ballot, to ensure it was counted". Politifact. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  441. ^ Fauzia, Miriam (November 3, 2020). "Fact check: Poll watcher turned away at Philadelphia polling station in misunderstanding". USA Today. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  442. ^ Hendrickson, Clara (November 6, 2020). "List does not show over 14,000 dead people cast ballots in Michigan's Wayne County". Politifact. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  443. ^ Keefe, Brendan (November 13, 2020). "Two accused "dead" Georgia voters very much alive despite claims – and they voted legally". 11Alive News. Atlanta, Georgia.
  444. ^ Boburg, Shawn; Bogage, Jacob (November 10, 2020). "Postal worker recanted allegations of ballot tampering, officials say". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  445. ^ Izadi, Elahe; Ellison, Sarah (November 9, 2020). "Fox News cuts away from Kayleigh McEnany news conference after she alleges vote fraud with no evidence". The Washington Post.
  446. ^ Broadwater, Luke (November 8, 2020). "As Biden Plans Transition, Republicans Decline to Recognize His Election". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020.
  447. ^ Shannon, Joel; Ciavaglia, Jo; McGinnis, James (November 8, 2020). "Giuliani holds press conference at landscaping business, prompting confusion". USA Today.
  448. ^ Stracqualursi, Veronica (November 11, 2020). "Republican election official in Philadelphia says he's seen no evidence of widespread fraud". CNN.
  449. ^ Blake, Aaron (November 12, 2020). "Trump lawyers suffer embarrassing rebukes from judges over voter fraud claims". The Washington Post.
  450. ^ Klasfield, Adam (November 5, 2020). "'Come on Now': Michigan Judge Scoffs at and Tosses Trump Campaign Lawsuit Backed by "Hearsay" Evidence". Law & Crime.
  451. ^ Silver-Greenberg, Jessica; Abrams, Rachel; Enrich, David (November 9, 2020). "Growing Discomfort at Law Firms Representing Trump in Election Lawsuits". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020.
  452. ^ Multiple sources:
  453. ^ Keating, Christopher (December 10, 2020). "Quinnipiac Poll: 77% of Republicans believe there was widespread fraud in the presidential election; 60% overall consider Joe Biden's victory legitimate". Yahoo! News. Retrieved December 15, 2020 – via Hartford Courant.
  454. ^ Page, Susan; Elbeshbishi, Sarah (December 24, 2020). "Exclusive: As Trump leaves office, 50% of Americans say he'll be seen as "failed" president". USA Today.
  455. ^ "ABC News/Ipsos Poll Jan 10". Scribd. ABC News. January 10, 2021. Retrieved January 11, 2021.
  456. ^ "Public Supports Both Early Voting And Requiring Photo ID to Vote". Monmouth University. June 21, 2021.
  457. ^ "ABC News / Ipsos Poll December 27-29, 2021 | PDF | Race And Ethnicity In The United States Census | Survey Methodology". Scribd.com. Retrieved January 9, 2022.
  458. ^ "Rasmussen Reports Survey: Most voters think that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election". Crime Prevention Research Center. March 15, 2022. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  459. ^ Wines, Michael (February 27, 2021). "In Statehouses, Stolen-Election Myth Fuels a G.O.P. Drive to Rewrite Rules". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021.
  460. ^ Davis, Tina (November 7, 2020). "Trump's Election Lawsuits: Where the Fights Are Playing Out". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  461. ^ Abramson, Alana; Abrams, Abigail (November 9, 2020). "Here Are All the Lawsuits the Trump Campaign Has Filed Since Election Day – And Why Most Are Unlikely to Go Anywhere". Time. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  462. ^ Gerstein, Josh (November 13, 2020). "Another law firm bails out on Trump campaign". Politico. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  463. ^ Wickert, David (December 13, 2020). "Georgia Supreme Court rejects Trump appeal". Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
  464. ^ a b c Duster, Chandelis (December 7, 2020). "Georgia reaffirms Biden's victory for 3rd time after recount, dealing major blow to Trump's attempt to overturn the results". CNN.
  465. ^ Gerstein, Josh (November 19, 2020). "Federal judge rejects Trump ally's bid to block election certification in Georgia". Politico.
  466. ^ Gardner, Amy; Itkowitz, Colby; Dawsey, Josh (December 5, 2020). "Trump calls Georgia governor to pressure him for help overturning Biden's win in the state". The Washington Post.
  467. ^ Colvin, Jill; Levy, Marc (December 20, 2020). "Trump wants Supreme Court to overturn Pa. election results". Yahoo! News. Retrieved December 20, 2020.
  468. ^ Olson, Tyler; Bream, Shannon; Mears, Bill (December 24, 2020). "Supreme Court in no hurry to hear Trump campaign case, sets response deadline two days after inauguration". Fox News. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  469. ^ Benen, Steve (December 11, 2020). "Ludicrous Texas anti-election lawsuit jolts Republican politics". MSNBC. Retrieved December 12, 2020.
  470. ^ "Editorial: The enduring cost of Trump's attempted coup". San Francisco Chronicle. December 10, 2020. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
  471. ^ Louis, Errol (December 10, 2020). "Trump's meddling was a failed coup". New York Daily News. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
  472. ^ Solender, Andrew (December 11, 2020). "126 House Republicans Now Support Lawsuit To Overturn Election In Updated Brief". Forbes. Retrieved December 12, 2020.
  473. ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (December 11, 2020). "Supreme Court rejects Texas-led effort to overturn Biden's victory". Retrieved December 11, 2020.
  474. ^ D'Angelo, Bob (December 12, 2020). "U.S. Supreme Court rejects Texas lawsuit". WHBQ. Retrieved December 12, 2020.
  475. ^ Dale, Daniel (June 12, 2021). "Trump is doing more lying about the election than talking about any other subject". CNN. Archived from the original on June 16, 2021. Similar graphic in source attributed to Janie Boschma, CNN.
  476. ^ Timm, Jane C. (November 4, 2020). "With states still counting, Trump falsely claims he won". NBC News. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  477. ^ McKeever, Amy (November 8, 2020). "No modern presidential candidate has refused to concede. Here's why that matters". National Geographic. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  478. ^ Zurcher, Anthony (November 11, 2020). "Biden: Trump refusal to concede 'an embarrassment'". BBC News. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  479. ^ Rein, Lisa; et al. (November 9, 2020). "White House, escalating tensions, orders agencies to rebuff Biden transition team". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  480. ^ Shear, Michael D.; Haberman, Maggie; Crowley, Michael (November 10, 2020). "Trump Appointee Stands Between Biden's Team and a Smooth Transition". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 10, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  481. ^ Vazquez, Maegan; Westwood, Sarah; Main, Alison (November 15, 2020). "Trump says for the first time Biden won the election but later insists he's not conceding". CNN. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
  482. ^ Brown, Matthew; Cummings, William (November 15, 2020). "Election 2020 updates: GOP governor expects Biden to be next president; John Bolton says Trump has no character". USA Today. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
  483. ^ Solender, Andrew (June 17, 2021). "Trump Says He 'Didn't Win' The 2020 Election And Wants Biden To 'Do Well'". Forbes. Archived from the original on July 17, 2021. Retrieved July 1, 2021.
  484. ^ Rein, Lisa; O'Connell, Jonathan; Dawsey, Josh (November 8, 2020). "A little-known Trump appointee is in charge of handing transition resources to Biden – and she isn't budging". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
  485. ^ Holmes, Kristen; Herb, Jeremy (November 23, 2020). "First on CNN: Key government agency acknowledges Biden's win and begins formal transition". CNN. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
  486. ^ Colson, Thomas (November 20, 2020). "Trump has reportedly given up on overturning battleground defeats and is trying to delay a final vote count in a desperate bid to throw Biden's victory into doubt". Business Insider. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
  487. ^ Shear, Michael D. (December 3, 2020). "Trump, in Video From White House, Delivers a 46-Minute Diatribe on the "Rigged" Election". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 3, 2020.
  488. ^ "McConnell for the first time recognizes Biden as President-elect". CNN. December 15, 2020. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  489. ^ Lipak, Kevin; Brown, Pamela (December 19, 2020). "Heated Oval Office meeting included talk of special counsel, martial law as Trump advisers clash". CNN News. Retrieved December 19, 2020.
  490. ^ Habberman, Maggie; Kanno-Youngs, Zolan (December 19, 2020). "Trump Weighed Naming Election Conspiracy Theorist as Special Counsel". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 19, 2020. Retrieved December 19, 2020.
  491. ^ Cheny, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (December 19, 2020). "Trump sought to tap Sidney Powell as special counsel for election fraud". Politico. Retrieved December 19, 2020.
  492. ^ Blake, Andrew (December 18, 2020). "Army brass rejects calls for martial law: "No role" for military in determining election outcome". The Washington Times. Retrieved December 20, 2020.
  493. ^ Goodwin, Jazmin (December 20, 2020). "Trump's talk of martial law sends White House staffers rushing to the press". CNN. Retrieved December 20, 2020.
  494. ^ Zapotosky, Matt (December 21, 2020). "Undercutting Trump, Barr says there's no basis for seizing voting machines, using special counsels for election fraud, Hunter Biden". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  495. ^ Gabriel, Trip; Saul, Stephanie (November 16, 2020). "Could State Legislatures Pick Electors to Vote for Trump? Not Likely". The New York Times. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  496. ^ Gardner, Amy; et al. (November 18, 2020). "As defeats pile up, Trump tries to delay vote count in last-ditch attempt to cast doubt on Biden victory". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
  497. ^ a b Levine, Sam (September 25, 2020). "Could Republicans ignore the popular vote and choose their own pro-Trump electors?". The Guardian. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  498. ^ Muller, Derek (November 12, 2020). "Congress would stop the most rogue Electoral College scenarios in their tracks". Excess of Democracy. Retrieved November 25, 2020.
  499. ^ Lessig, Lawrence (November 18, 2020). "State legislatures do not have the power to veto the people's choice in an election". USA Today. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  500. ^ Prokop, Andrew (November 13, 2020). "The many obstacles to the "GOP state legislatures steal the election for Trump" scenario". Vox. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  501. ^ a b Gardner, Amy; Dawsey, Josh; Bade, Rachael (December 7, 2020). "Trump asks Pennsylvania House speaker for help overturning election results, personally intervening in a third state". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  502. ^ Kumar, Anita; Orr, Gabby; McGraw, Meridith (December 21, 2020). "Inside Trump's pressure campaign to overturn the election". Politico. Retrieved December 22, 2020.
  503. ^ Grayer, Annie; Kelly, Caroline; Vazquez, Maegan (November 21, 2020). "Michigan lawmakers who met with Trump say they see nothing to change election outcome". CNN. Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  504. ^ Raymond, Jonathan (December 30, 2020). "Trump calls Gov. Kemp "obstructionist," says he should resign". 11Alive. Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  505. ^ Shear, Michael D.; Saul, Stephanie (January 3, 2021). "Trump, in Taped Call, Pressured Georgia Official to "Find" Votes to Overturn Election". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  506. ^ Smith, Allan; Moe, Alex (January 4, 2021). "Democrats ask FBI Director Wray to open criminal probe into Trump after leaked phone call – Reps. Ted Lieu and Kathleen Rice wrote that they believe Trump "engaged in solicitation of, or conspiracy to commit, a number of election crimes"". NBC News. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  507. ^ Raju, Manu; Herb, Jeremy (January 4, 2021). "House Republicans rush to Trump's defense over Georgia call as Democrats prep censure resolution". CNN. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  508. ^ Gardner, Amy (March 11, 2021). "Trump pressured a Georgia elections investigator in a separate call legal experts say could amount to obstruction". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 21, 2021.
  509. ^ Sonmez, Felicia (January 3, 2021). "Trump urges nearly 300 state legislators to decertify election results". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  510. ^ Cassidy, Christina A. (November 12, 2020). "Explainer: Is Georgia's upcoming ballot "audit" a recount?". Associated Press News. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  511. ^ Holder, Josh; Walker, Amy Schoenfeld (November 20, 2020). "Where Georgia's Hand Recount Differed From the Initial Tally, by County". The New York Times.
  512. ^ Sprunt, Barbara (November 19, 2020). "Georgia's Recount Confirms Biden's Lead; AP Declares Him State's Winner". NPR. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  513. ^ Linton, Caroline (November 21, 2020). "Georgia governor calls for audit after state certifies election results". CBS News. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  514. ^ Brumback, Kate (November 20, 2020). "Georgia officials certify election results showing Biden win". Associated Press News.
  515. ^ Jester, Julia; Romero, Dennis (November 21, 2020). "Trump campaign asks for another Georgia recount". NBC News. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  516. ^ Gregorian, Dareh; Jackson, Hallie; Brewster, Shaquille; Alba, Monica (November 18, 2020). "Trump campaign requests costly partial recount in Wisconsin". NBC News. Retrieved October 24, 2023.
  517. ^ Breuninger, Kevin; Mangan, Dan (November 18, 2020). "Trump campaign requests partial Wisconsin recount, deposits $3 million to challenge Biden victory". CNBC. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  518. ^ Deese, Kaelan (November 21, 2020). "Milwaukee officials accuse Trump observers of obstructing recount". The Hill. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  519. ^ Marley, Patrick (November 29, 2020). "Biden gains 87 votes in Trump's $3 million Wisconsin recount as Dane County wraps up review. President plans lawsuit". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
  520. ^ a b "Electoral College makes it official: Biden won, Trump lost". Associated Press News. December 14, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
  521. ^ a b c d Willis, Haisten; Duda, Jeremy; Masterson, Kathleen; Fahrenthold, David A. (December 14, 2020). "As electoral college formalizes Biden's win, Trump backers hold their own vote". The Washington Post.
  522. ^ Hutzler, Alexandra (December 14, 2020). "Electoral College Cements Joe Biden's Victory With Zero Faithless Electors". Newsweek. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
  523. ^ Riccardi, Nicholas (December 14, 2020). "Why Trump's latest Electoral College ploy is doomed to fail". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 15, 2020. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  524. ^ a b Easley, Jonathan (December 15, 2020). "Biden rips Trump's refusal to concede after Electoral College vote". The Hill. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
  525. ^ "Biden hails democracy and rebukes Trump after electoral college victory". The Guardian. December 15, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
  526. ^ Fandos, Nicholas; Schmidt, Michael S. (December 14, 2020). "Trump Allies Eye Long-Shot Election Reversal in Congress, Testing Pence". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 13, 2020. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  527. ^ Brockell, Gillian (January 5, 2021). "The senators who were expelled after refusing to accept Lincoln's election". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 5, 2021.
  528. ^ "GOP senator to object to Electoral College results, forcing Congress to vote on overturning Biden's win". NBC News. December 30, 2020.
  529. ^ Carney, Jordain (January 2, 2021). "11 Senate Republicans say they will oppose Electoral College results Wednesday". The Hill.
  530. ^ Broadwater, Luke (January 2, 2021). "Pence Welcomes Bid to Overturn Biden's Election as Republican Senators Join – The vice president's office said he welcomed the efforts of a group of Republican lawmakers who plan to object to the outcome of the election". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  531. ^ Cheney, Kyle (December 28, 2020). "Gohmert suit may force Pence's hand in effort to overturn Trump's defeat". Politico.
  532. ^ Breuninger, Kevin (December 28, 2020). "Congressman, other Republicans sue Vice President Pence in last-ditch effort to overturn Biden win". CNBC.
  533. ^ "Order of Dismissal". Gohmert v. Pence (PDF) (Court case).
  534. ^ Edmondson, Catie; Haberman, Maggie (January 1, 2021). "Federal Judge Dismisses Election Lawsuit Against Pence – President Trump's congressional allies had hoped to give the vice president the power to reject electoral votes that were cast for Joseph R. Biden Jr". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  535. ^ Vella, Lauren (January 2, 2021). "Appeals court dismisses Gohmert's election suit against Pence". The Hill. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  536. ^ Schmidt, Michael S. (January 5, 2021). "Trump Says Pence Can Overturn His Loss in Congress. That's Not How It Works". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved January 6, 2021.
  537. ^ Haberman, Maggie; Karni, Annie (January 5, 2021). "Pence Said to Have Told Trump He Lacks Power to Change Election Result". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved January 6, 2021.
  538. ^ "Trump is inciting chaos on Jan. 6, both in and outside the Capitol". The Washington Post. December 30, 2020. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  539. ^ Editorial board (December 30, 2020). "Trump is inciting chaos on Jan. 6, both in and outside the Capitol". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  540. ^ "Roll Call Vote 117th Congress – 1st Session: On the Objection (Shall the Objection Submitted by the Gentleman from Arizona, Mr. Gosar, and the Senator from Texas, Mr. Cruz, and Others Be Sustained? )". www.senate.gov. United States Senate. January 6, 2021. Archived from the original on January 7, 2021. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  541. ^ King, Ledyard; Groppe, Maureen; Wu, Nicholas; Jansen, Bart; Subramanian, Courtney; Garrison, Joey (January 6, 2021). "Pence confirms Biden as winner, officially ending electoral count after day of violence at Capitol". USA Today. Archived from the original on January 7, 2021. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  542. ^ "Congress affirms Biden's Electoral College victory". CNN. January 6, 2021. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  543. ^ "Capitol assault a more sinister attack than first appeared". Associated Press News. January 11, 2021. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
  544. ^ Macias, Amanda; Mangan, Dan (January 6, 2021). "U.S. Capitol secured hours after pro-Trump rioters invade Congress". CNBC. Archived from the original on January 7, 2021. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  545. ^ "Capitol attack: Congress certifies Joe Biden's victory after deadly violence". BBC News. January 7, 2021. Archived from the original on January 7, 2021. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  546. ^ Graham, David (January 6, 2021). "This Is a Coup". The Atlantic. Retrieved January 6, 2021.
  547. ^ "Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes after riot, medical examiner says". NBC News. April 19, 2021. Retrieved April 20, 2021.
  548. ^ Dozier, Kimberly; Bergengruen, Vera (January 7, 2021). "Incited by the President, Trump Supporters Violently Storm the Capitol". Time. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  549. ^ "Donald Trump becomes the first US president to be impeached for a second time – as it happened". The Guardian. January 13, 2021. Retrieved January 21, 2021.
  550. ^ Fleming, Leah (September 21, 2021). "Author Keith Boykin: "America Is In A Cold Civil War"". Georgia Public Broadcasting. Retrieved June 22, 2022.
  551. ^ "Former White House Russia expert Fiona Hill warns the U.S. is on a path to autocracy". NPR. Retrieved June 22, 2022.
  552. ^ "UC San Diego Political Scientist Warns Of A Second Civil War After Capitol Riot". KPBS Public Media. January 7, 2021. Retrieved June 22, 2022.
  553. ^ Bernstein: There is a "civil war of untruth" in America – CNN Video, November 15, 2020, retrieved June 22, 2022
  554. ^ "The next US civil war is already here – we just refuse to see it". The Guardian. January 4, 2022. Retrieved June 22, 2022.
  555. ^ Doherty, Erin (February 10, 2022). "Kinzinger: "We have to recognize" possibility of a civil war". Axios. Retrieved June 22, 2022.
  556. ^ Mathias, Christopher (May 12, 2021). "Former U.S. Military Leaders Sign Bizarre Open Letter Pushing Election Lies". HuffPost. Retrieved May 13, 2021.
  557. ^ Edmondson, Catie; Fandos, Nicholas (February 4, 2021). "House Republicans Choose to Keep Liz Cheney in Leadership". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  558. ^ Strauss, Daniel (May 12, 2021). "Liz Cheney removed from House leadership over Trump criticism". The Guardian. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
  559. ^ Peterson, Kristina (May 5, 2021). "Behind Liz Cheney's Break With Kevin McCarthy Over Trump". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
  560. ^ Yen, Hope (May 6, 2021). "AP Fact Check: Yes, Trump lost election despite what he says". Associated Press News. Retrieved August 22, 2021.
  561. ^ Dickson, Caitlin (August 4, 2021). "Poll: Two-thirds of Republicans still think the 2020 election was rigged". Yahoo! News. Retrieved August 22, 2021.
  562. ^ Graziosi, Graig (August 13, 2021). "Critics mock believers in former President Donald Trump's 'reinstatement day'". Yahoo! News. Retrieved August 22, 2021.
  563. ^ Cooper, Jonathan J.; Christie, Bob (May 10, 2021). "Inside Arizona's election audit, GOP fraud fantasies live on". Associated Press News. Retrieved August 6, 2021.
  564. ^ Fifield, Jen (February 23, 2021). "Maricopa County's 2020 election votes were counted correctly, more county audits show". USA Today. Retrieved June 8, 2021.
  565. ^ Christie, Bob (March 31, 2021). "CEO of firm eyeing ballots appeared to make political posts". Associated Press News.
  566. ^ Cooper, Jonathan J. (July 28, 2021). "Trump supporters raise $5.7M for Arizona election audit". Associated Press News. Retrieved August 6, 2021.
  567. ^ Cooper, Jonathan J. (July 16, 2021). "Arizona election auditors seek more records, voter canvass". Associated Press News.
  568. ^ Fischer, Howard (August 3, 2021). "Judge orders Arizona Senate to immediately release documents about election audit". Arizona Daily Star.
  569. ^ Helderman, Rosalind S. (September 24, 2021). "Arizona ballot review commissioned by Republicans reaffirms Biden's victory". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 24, 2021.
  570. ^ Katz, A.J. (November 4, 2020). "Fox News Is the No. 1 Network for 2020 Election Night Coverage". Adweek. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.

Further reading

Voter fraud

Policy implications

    Discuss

    OnAir membership is required. The lead Moderator for the discussions is Scott Joy. We encourage civil, honest, and safe discourse. For more information on commenting and giving feedback, see our Comment Guidelines.

    Skip to toolbar