NTSB: National Transportation Safety Board

NTSB: National Transportation Safety Board

Summary

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is an independent U.S. government investigative agency responsible for civil transportation accident investigation. In this role, the NTSB investigates and reports on aviation accidents and incidents, certain types of highway crashes, ship and marine accidents, pipeline incidents, bridge failures, and railroad accidents.

The NTSB is also in charge of investigating cases of hazardous materials releases that occur during transportation. The agency is based in Washington, D.C. It has four regional offices, located in Anchorage, Alaska; Denver, Colorado; Ashburn, Virginia; and Seattle, Washington. The agency also operates a national training center at its Ashburn facility.

Source: Wikipedia

OnAir Post: NTSB: National Transportation Safety Board

About

Overview

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Our Mission

Making transportation safer. We carry out our mission by—

  • ​​Maintaining our congressionally mandated independence.
  • Conducting objective, thorough investigations and safety studies.
  • Deciding fairly and objectively appeals of enforcement actions by the FAA and US Coast Guard and certificate denials by the FAA.
  • Advocating for implementation of safety recommendations.
  • Assisting victims and survivors of transportation disasters and their families.​

The ​​NTSB Board​

​​The NTSB has five Board Members, each nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to serve 5-year terms. The President designates a Board Member as Chair and another as Vice Chair for 3-year terms. The Chair requires separate Senate confirmation. When there is no designated Chair, the Vice Chair serves in an acting capacity. NTSB currently has two vacant board member seats​.

More Info >

​​​NTSB History

The NTSB originated in the Air Commerce Act of 1926, in which the U.S. Congress charged the U.S. Department of Commerce with investigating the causes of aircraft accidents. Later, that responsibility was given to the Civil Aeronautics Board’s Bureau of Aviation Safety, when it was created in 1940.

More Info >

Employment at NTSB

The NTSB has approximately 400 employees located in its Headquarters in Washington, DC, and in regional field offices in Aurora (CO), Federal Way (WA), and Anchorage (AK).

More Info >​

Source: Government Website

Web Links

More Information

Wikipedia

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is an independent U.S. government investigative agency responsible for civil transportation accident investigation. In this role, the NTSB investigates and reports on aviation accidents and incidents, certain types of highway crashes, ship and marine accidents, pipeline incidents, bridge failures, and railroad accidents.[3] The NTSB is also in charge of investigating cases of hazardous materials releases that occur during transportation. The agency is based in Washington, D.C. It has four regional offices, located in Anchorage, Alaska; Denver, Colorado; Ashburn, Virginia; and Seattle, Washington.[4] The agency also operated a national training center at its Ashburn facility.[5]

History

NTSB headquarters

The origin of the NTSB was in the Air Commerce Act of 1926, which assigned the United States Department of Commerce responsibility for investigating domestic aviation accidents.[6] Before the NTSB, the Federal Aviation Administration‘s (FAA; at the time the CAA/Civil Aviation Authority) independence was questioned as it was investigating itself and would be biased to find external faults, coalescing with the 1931 crash killing Notre Dame coach Knute Rockne[7] and the 1935 crash that killed Senator Bronson Cutting.[8] The US’s first “independent” Air Safety Board was established in 1938:[9] it lasted only fourteen months.[10] In 1940, this authority was transferred to the Civil Aeronautics Board‘s newly formed Bureau of Aviation Safety.[6]

In 1967, Congress created a separate cabinet-level Department of Transportation, which among other things, established the Federal Aviation Administration as an agency under the DOT.[11] At the same time, the NTSB was established as an independent agency which absorbed the Bureau of Aviation Safety’s responsibilities.[11] However, from 1967 to 1975, the NTSB reported to the DOT for administrative purposes, while conducting investigations into the Federal Aviation Administration, also a DOT agency.[12]

To avoid any conflict, Congress passed the Independent Safety Board Act, and on April 1, 1975, the NTSB became a fully independent agency.[1][6] As of 2015, the NTSB has investigated over 140,000 aviation incidents and several thousand surface transportation incidents.[13]

Organization

Formally, the “National Transportation Safety Board” refers to a five-manager investigative board whose five members are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate for five-year terms.[14] Board members may continue to serve until a successor is confirmed and takes office.[15] No more than three of the five members may be from the same political party.[15] One of the five board members is nominated as the chair by the President and then approved by the Senate for a fixed three-year term; another is designated as vice-chair for a fixed three-year term and who becomes acting chair when there is no formal chair.[16][15] This board is authorized by Congress under Chapter 11, Title 49 of the United States Code to investigate civil aviation, highway, marine, pipeline, and railroad accidents and incidents.[17] This five-member board is authorized to establish and manage separate sub-offices for highway, marine, aviation, railroad, pipeline, and hazardous materials investigations.[15]

Since its creation, the NTSB’s primary mission has been “to determine the probable cause of transportation accidents and incidents and to formulate safety recommendations to improve transportation safety (in the USA)“.[13] Based on the results of investigations within its jurisdiction, the NTSB issues formal safety recommendations to agencies and institutions with the power to implement those recommendations.[1] The NTSB considers safety recommendations to be its primary tool for preventing future civil transportation accidents.[1] However, the NTSB does not have the authority to enforce its safety recommendations.[13]

Current board members

Main article: List of members of the National Transportation Safety Board

The current board members as of September 24, 2024:[18]

PositionNamePartyTook officeTerm expires
ChairJennifer HomendyDemocraticAugust 13, 2021 (as chair)
August 20, 2018 (as member)		August 13, 2027 (as chair)
December 31, 2029 (as member)
MemberMichael GrahamRepublicanJanuary 3, 2020December 31, 2025
MemberThomas B. ChapmanDemocraticJanuary 6, 2020December 31, 2023
MemberAlvin BrownDemocraticMarch 13, 2024December 31, 2026
MemberJ. Todd InmanRepublicanMarch 13, 2024December 31, 2027

Nominations

President Biden has nominated the following to fill a seat on the board. They await Senate confirmation.[19]

NamePartyTerm expiresReplacing
Thomas B. ChapmanDemocraticDecember 31, 2028Reappointment

Accident and incident investigations

NTSB “go team” members at the Asiana Airlines Flight 214 crash site
NTSB investigators on-scene at the 2015 Philadelphia train derailment

The NTSB is the lead agency in investigating a civil transportation accident or incident within its sphere. An investigation of a major accident within the United States typically starts with the creation of a “go team”, composed of specialists in fields relating to the incident who are rapidly deployed to the incident location.[4] The “go team” can have as few as three people or as many as a dozen, depending on the nature of the incident.[4] The agency may then hold public hearings on the issue following the investigation.[4] Ultimately, it will publish a final report which may include safety recommendations based on its findings. The NTSB has no legal authority to implement or impose its recommendations. Its recommendations are often implemented by regulators at the federal or state level or by individual transportation companies.[20]

The NTSB played a critical role in the investigation of the Norfolk Southern Railway derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, in February 2023. The NTSB’s report, unanimously adopted by its board, highlighted significant failures by Norfolk Southern, particularly in the decision to conduct a vent and burn of toxic chemicals, which was deemed unnecessary and based on misleading information provided by the railway. The report also criticized Norfolk Southern’s obstruction during the investigation, noting delays in providing critical information and attempts to influence the investigation’s outcome. The NTSB’s findings have led to new safety recommendations aimed at preventing similar incidents in the future, including better communication protocols and more stringent oversight of emergency response procedures.[21]

The NTSB concluded that poor bridge resource management and a charting error led to the collision between the dry bulk carrier Ocean Princess and the SP-83A oil and gas production platform in the Gulf of Mexico on January 7, 2021. The incident occurred because the platform was not visible on the vessel’s electronic chart display, although it was present on the paper chart used by the mate on watch. The NTSB highlighted the importance of effective bridge management and the dangers of over-reliance on electronic navigation tools.[22]

Jurisdiction over investigations

Aviation
The NTSB has primary authority to investigate every civil aviation accident in the United States; the agency is also authorized to conduct investigations involving both civilian and military aircraft “with the participation of appropriate military authorities”.[23] Aviation includes certain commercial space accidents.[24] For certain accidents, due to resource limitations, the Board will ask the FAA to collect the factual information at the scene of the accident; the NTSB bases its report on that information.
Surface Transportation
The NTSB has the authority to investigate all highway accidents and incidents, including incidents at railway grade crossings, “in cooperation with a State”.[3] The NTSB has primary jurisdiction over railway accidents and incidents which result in death or significant property damage, or which involve a passenger train.[3]
Marine
For marine investigations, jurisdiction into investigations is divided between the NTSB and the U.S. Coast Guard.[3] The division of investigative jurisdiction and responsibilities is prescribed in a detailed Memorandum of Understanding between the two agencies.
Pipeline
The NTSB has primary jurisdiction over pipeline incidents (often the result of third-party excavation damage) which involve “a fatality, substantial property damage, or significant injury to the environment”.[3]
Assistance to criminal investigations
The NTSB has primary jurisdiction over civil transportation investigations, not criminal ones. If the Attorney General declares the case to be linked to a criminal act, the NTSB must relinquish control of the investigation to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.[3] The NTSB may still provide technical support to the FBI in such investigations. In two high-profile examples, the NTSB sent aviation accident investigators with knowledge of aircraft structures and flight recorders to assist the FBI’s criminal investigation into the murder-suicide of Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771 in 1987, and the September 11, 2001, attacks fourteen years later.[25]
Assistance to other domestic agencies
In addition to assisting the Department of Justice in criminal investigations, the NTSB has also assisted the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in its investigations of both the Challenger and the Columbia Space Shuttle disasters. The NTSB can also assist the U.S. military in investigating military incidents within the realm of the NTSB’s expertise, such as the crash of an Air Force transport plane in former Yugoslavia that killed more than 30 Americans, including Commerce Secretary Ron Brown.
Assistance to foreign governments
The NTSB may assist in incident or accident investigations outside the United States under certain circumstances. These may include accidents or incidents involving American-registered or American-owned civil aircraft or aircraft with U.S.-manufactured components in foreign air space. Officially, NTSB employees are prohibited from releasing information about “another country’s investigation”, although this has happened in the past.[26]

Use of the “party system”

To conduct its investigations, the NTSB operates under the “party system”, which utilizes the support and participation of industry and labor representatives with expertise or technical knowledge specifically useful to its investigation. The NTSB may invite these individuals or organizations to become parties to the investigation and participate under the supervision of the NTSB.[27][28][29] The NTSB has discretion over which organizations it allows to participate.[28] Only individuals with relevant technical expertise can represent an organization in an investigation, and attorneys and insurance investigators are prohibited by law from participating.[28][29]

The NTSB considers the party system crucial to the investigative process, as it provides the NTSB with access to individuals with specialized expertise or knowledge relevant to a particular investigation.[27][28] However, the use of the party system is not without controversy. The NTSB invited Boeing to participate as a party to the investigation of the crash of TWA Flight 800, a Boeing 747, in 1996. While the NTSB relied on Boeing’s sharing of expertise, it was later determined that Boeing had withheld a study of military versions of the 747 that investigated flammable vapor combustion in the center fuel tank.[30] Boeing had told the NTSB that it had no studies proving or disproving the vapor combustion theory.[30] In response to political pressure after the Boeing incident, the NTSB commissioned the nonprofit Rand Corporation to conduct an independent study of the NTSB’s aircraft investigation process.[30]

In 2000, Rand published its report, which concluded that the party system is “a key component of the NTSB investigative process” and that participant parties “are uniquely able to provide essential information about aircraft design and manufacture, airline operations, or functioning of [the National Airspace System] that simply cannot be obtained elsewhere”.[31]: 31  However, Rand also found conflicts of interest inherent in the party system, “may, in some instances, threaten the integrity of the NTSB investigative process”.[31]: 30  The Rand study recommended that the NTSB reduce its reliance on party representatives and make greater use of independent investigators, including from NASA, the Department of Defense, government research laboratories, and universities.[31]: 31–32  As of 2014, the NTSB has not adopted these recommendations and instead continues to rely on the party system.[32]

Safety recommendations

NTSB hearing in 2013 on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner battery problems

As of 2014, the NTSB has issued about 14,000 safety recommendations in its history, 73 percent of which have been adopted in whole or in part by the entities to which they were directed.[13] Starting in 1990, the NTSB annually published a “Most Wanted List”, which highlights safety recommendations that the NTSB believes would provide the most significant — and sometimes immediate — benefit to the traveling public.[1][13][33] The list was discontinued in 2023 such that “the NTSB can more nimbly advocate for [their] recommendations and emerging safety issues”.[34][35]

Among transportation safety improvements brought about or inspired by NTSB recommendations:

Aviation
Mid-air collision avoidance technology, ground proximity warning systems, airborne wind shear detection and alert systems, smoke detectors in lavatories and fuel tank inerting.
Highway
Graduated drivers license laws for young drivers, age-21 drinking laws, smart airbag technology, center high-mounted stop lights, commercial drivers licenses, and improved school bus construction standards.
Rail
Positive train control, improved emergency exits for passenger rail cars, and double-shelf couplers for hazardous material rail cars.
Marine
Recreational boating safety, improved fire safety on cruise ships, and lifesaving devices on fishing vessels.
Pipeline
Excavation damage prevention, pipe corrosion protection, and remote shutoff valves.
Multi-Modal
Alcohol and drug testing in all modes of transportation.

Other responsibilities

TWA Flight 800 wreckage, as reconstructed by the NTSB

A less well-known responsibility of the NTSB is that it serves as a court of appeals for airmen, aircraft mechanics, certificated aviation-related companies, and mariners who have their licenses suspended or revoked by the FAA or the Coast Guard. The NTSB employs administrative law judges who initially hear all appeals, and the administrative law judge’s ruling may be appealed to the five-member Board.[36] The Board’s determinations may be appealed to the federal court system by the losing party, whether it is the individual or company, on the one hand, or the FAA or the Coast Guard, on the other.[36] However, from Ferguson v. NTSB, the NTSB’s determinations are not overturned by the federal courts unless the NTSB abused its discretion or its determination is wholly unsupported by the evidence.[37]

The Safety Board maintains a training academy[5] in Ashburn, Virginia, where it conducts courses for its employees and professionals in other government agencies, foreign governments or private companies, in areas such as general accident investigation, specific elements of investigations like survival factors or human performance, or related matters like family affairs or media relations. The facility houses for training purposes the reconstruction of more than 90 feet of the TWA Flight 800 Boeing 747,[38] which was recovered from the Atlantic Ocean after it crashed on July 17, 1996, following a fuel tank explosion.

On February 22, 2021, the NTSB announced that the TWA Flight 800 recreation would be decommissioned on July 7, 2021. This decision comes as the lease for the Ashburn training center expires shortly. The NTSB indicated it is moving away from large-scale reconstructions like with TWA Flight 800 and towards using 3D scans to reconstruct accidents. Under an agreement made with the victims’ families, when the reconstruction was retained as a training tool, the reconstruction was not allowed to be used as a public exhibit or put on display. For this reason, the NTSB is planning to dismantle and destroy the reconstruction.[39]

See also

Other countries

References

  1. ^ a b c d e “We Are All Safer: Lessons Learned and Lives Saved 1975–2005. 3rd ed. Safety Report NTSB/SR-05/01” (PDF). National Transportation Safety Board. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 5, 2016. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  2. ^ “NTSB Media Brief – Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 (Jan 8) livestream”. National Transportation Safety Board. Retrieved January 10, 2024.
  3. ^ a b c d e f 49 U.S.C. § 1131
  4. ^ a b c d Office of the Chief Records Officer (December 19, 2014). “Records Management Oversight Inspection Report 2014” (PDF). National Archives and Records Administration. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 15, 2015. Retrieved December 20, 2015.
  5. ^ a b “NTSB Training Center”. National Transportation Safety Board. Archived from the original on December 22, 2015. Retrieved December 20, 2015.
  6. ^ a b c “History of The National Transportation Safety Board”. National Transportation Safety Board. Archived from the original on May 12, 2016. Retrieved December 20, 2015.
  7. ^ William Tuccio (November 8, 2018). “Opinion: When A Near-Accident Requires Deeper Investigation”. Aviation Week & Space Technology. Archived from the original on November 14, 2018. Retrieved November 20, 2018.
  8. ^ Freeze, Christopher (March 2021). “ALPA at 90: Accident Investigation”. alpa.org. Archived from the original on May 20, 2023. Retrieved May 20, 2023.
  9. ^ Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938
  10. ^ U.S. Senate. Select Committee on Government Organization. A Resolution Disapproving Reorganization Plan Numbered IV, Hearings. May 9–10, 1940.
  11. ^ a b “A Brief History of the FAA”. Federal Aviation Administration. Archived from the original on January 20, 2017. Retrieved December 20, 2015.
  12. ^ Fidell, Eugene R. (Winter 1980). “Improving Competence in the Merchant Marine: Suspension and Revocation Proceedings”. Missouri Law Review. 45 (a): 25.
  13. ^ a b c d e “Annual Report to Congress 2014” (PDF). National Transportation Safety Board. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  14. ^ Fielding, Eric; Lo, Andrew W.; Yang, Jian Helen (2011). “The National Transportation Safety Board: A Model for Systemic Risk Management”. Journal of Investment Risk Management. First Quarter. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1695781. S2CID 167346503.
  15. ^ a b c d 49 U.S.C. § 1111
  16. ^ The Board at NTSB Archived June 3, 2020, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved June 18, 2014
  17. ^ 49 U.S.C. §§ 1101–1155
  18. ^ “The NTSB Board”. NTSB.gov. National Transportation Safety Board. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  19. ^ “Quick Search National Transportation Safety Board”. Congress.gov. Library of Congress. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  20. ^ “The Investigative Process”. National Transportation Safety Board. Archived from the original on March 17, 2022. Retrieved December 20, 2015.
  21. ^ Riley, Kim (June 26, 2024). “Norfolk Southern Blasted by Government: East Palestine Reeling from Crisis Management Failures”. Transportation Today. Retrieved August 13, 2024.
  22. ^ Carey, Liz (August 25, 2022). “NTSB determines 2021 carrier strike of oil production platform fault of poor bridge management, charting”. Transportation Today. Retrieved August 13, 2024.
  23. ^ 49 U.S.C. § 1132
  24. ^ “Office of Aviation Safety”. www.ntsb.gov. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
  25. ^ “NTSB Providing Technical Assistance to FBI Investigation” (Press release). National Transportation Safety Board. September 13, 2001. Archived from the original on December 22, 2015. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  26. ^ Horikoshi, Toyohiro. “U.S. leaked crucial Boeing repair flaw Archived February 2, 2017, at the Wayback Machine that led to 1985 JAL jet crash: ex-officials.” Japan Times – Kyodo. (August 11, 2015).
  27. ^ a b “What is the National Transportation Safety Board?” (PDF). National Transportation Safety Board. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 13, 2016. Retrieved May 11, 2016.
  28. ^ a b c d Michael Ferguson; Sean Nelson (2012). Aviation Safety: A Balanced Industry Approach. Cengage Learning. p. 37.
  29. ^ a b 49 CFR 831.11
  30. ^ a b c Alvear, Michael (December 6, 1996). “Crash course in ethics”. Salon. Archived from the original on June 2, 2016. Retrieved May 11, 2016.
  31. ^ a b c “Safety in the Skies: Personnel and Parties in NTSB Aviation Accident Investigations” (PDF). RAND Corporation. January 1, 2000. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 21, 2014. Retrieved May 11, 2016.
  32. ^ “Unchecked carnage: NTSB probes are skimpy for small-aircraft crashes”. USA Today. June 12, 2014. Archived from the original on May 5, 2016. Retrieved May 11, 2016.
  33. ^ “Most Wanted List Archive”. www.ntsb.gov. Archived from the original on June 6, 2022. Retrieved June 7, 2022.
  34. ^ “NTSB Retires Most Wanted List of Transportation Safety Improvements”. www.ntsb.gov. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
  35. ^ Phelps, Mark (December 14, 2023). “NTSB’s ‘Most Wanted’ List Of Safety Issues To Be Retired”. AVweb. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
  36. ^ a b “Office of Administrative Law Judges”. National Transportation Safety Board. Archived from the original on December 22, 2015. Retrieved December 21, 2015.
  37. ^ Ferguson v. National Transportation Safety Board, 678 F.2d 821 (9th Cir. 1982).
  38. ^ Hall, Jim (December 8, 1997). “Statement at the Opening of the NTSB Investigative Hearing Into the Crash of TWA Flight 800”. NTSB. Archived from the original on June 28, 2017. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
  39. ^ National Transportation Safety Board. “NTSB’s TWA Flight 800 Reconstruction to be Decommissioned”. ntsb.gov. Washington D.C.: United States Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on February 22, 2021. Retrieved May 16, 2021.


source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Transportation_Safety_Board

    Discuss

    OnAir membership is required. The lead Moderator for the discussions is US onAir Curator. We encourage civil, honest, and safe discourse. For more information on commenting and giving feedback, see our Comment Guidelines.

    This is an open discussion on the contents of this post.

    Home › Forums › Open Discussion

    Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
    Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
    Skip to toolbar