­

Why AI Spending Reminds Jim Chanos of the Fracking Bubble: Some of what I learned from the market veteran

Paul Krugman (Substack)

Forget that. How about the capital being employed? There better be something new. I mean, we’re talking now for the just a top handful of companies doing $300 to $500 billion in capex [capital expenditures] annually. I mean, AI isn’t like the internet, which made things more capital efficient and raised returns on capital.

So far, AI is doing the opposite. It is a massively capital-intensive business. Someone joked that the top tech companies are now looking like the oil frackers did in 2014, 2015, where more and more capital is chasing arguably a variable return.

Translation: these days tech companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year on equipment and buildings (the capex he’s talking about), so it’s not like the internet boom, which didn’t involve large-scale spending. And he’s doubtful about whether future returns will justify the current levels of AI spending.

Discuss

OnAir membership is required. The lead Moderator for the discussions is US onAir Curator. We encourage civil, honest, and safe discourse. For more information on commenting and giving feedback, see our Comment Guidelines.

This is an open discussion on this news piece.

Home Forums Open Discussion

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar